Assessing the Labour Government’s new procurement approach through a Māori economic justice perspective
Keywords:Economic justice, social procurement, M?ori, Te Tiriti
INTRODUCTION: Social procurement—the intentional generation of social value through an organisation’s procurement and commissioning processes—is being adopted globally and in Aotearoa New Zealand as progressive social policy. Some of the issues that lie behind calls for economic justice, such as economic opportunity, rights for vulnerable workers, and unemployment, may be addressed through social procurement. While Māori may also benefit from this, there are other factors that should be considered from a Te Tiriti perspective.
METHOD: In this research brief, we outline the context behind the government’s current initiatives, drawing on policy and research literature as part of a scoping study aimed at developing a Te Tiriti approach to social procurement.
CONCLUSION: We conclude by noting the opportunities for economic justice for Māori, but also some of the caveats drawn from international and Aotearoa New Zealand literature.
Bajari, P., McMillan, R., & Tadelis, S. (2009). Auctions versus negotiations in procurement: An empirical analysis. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 25(2), 372–399. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewn002
Burkett, I. (2010). Social procurement in Australia. https://www.csi.edu.au/media/uploads/Social_ Procurement_in_Australia_Report_-_December_2010.pdf
Came, Warbrick, I., Doole, C., Hotere-Barnes, A., & Sessa, M. (2020). He hokinga ki te mauri: Strengthening te Tiriti o Waitangi public health education in tertiary education settings. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(8), 926–941. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1613357
Collins, A. (2006). The scope for using social clauses in UK public procurement to benefit the UK manufacturing sector. A Report for the Manufacturing Forum. THE RESEARCH TEAM. https://www.ratransport.co.uk/images/Report Final 21July06.pdf
Cutcher, L., Ormiston, J., & Gardner, C. (2020). “Double- taxing” Indigenous business: exploring the effects of political discourse on the transfer of public procurement policy. Public Management Review, 22(9), 1398–1422. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1679235
Denny-Smith, G., Williams, M., & Loosemore, M. (2020). Assessing the impact of social procurement policies for Indigenous people. Construction Management and Economics, 38(12), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2020.1795217
Furneaux, C., & Barraket, J. (2014). Purchasing social good(s): A definition and typology of social procurement. Public Money and Management, 34(4), 265–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2014.920199
Greig, E. (2010). The Māori right to development and new forms of property. (Unpublished honours dissertation) The University of Otago.
Henare, M., Lythberg, B., & Woods, C. (2014). Teaming with intent: harmonising heritage, innovation and multiple generations within the Māori entrepreneurial team. The Business & Management Review, 5(1), 465–477. http://search.proquest.com/openview/e4761c3d75bf4fc24b89c967696764da/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2026610
Howells, L., Parfitt, S., Robinson, S., Sarter, E. K. (2020). New development: Myth or reality? The public sector’s growing appetite to procure from the third sector. Public Money & Management, 40(2), 170–173.
Hudson, M. L., & Russell, K. (2009). The Treaty of Waitangi and research ethics in Aotearoa. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 6(1), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-008-9127-0
Hurt-Suwan, C. J. P., & Mahler, M. L. (2020). Social procurement to reduce precarious employment for Māori and Pasifika workers in the construction industry. Kotuitui, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/1177083X.2020.1767164
Kawharu, A. (2016). The Treaty of Waitangi exception in New Zealand’s free trade agreements. Journal of International Law, 17(2), 286.
Kimel, M. (2015). What do the Toronto Pan Am Games 2015 have to do with social enterprise? Sojo. https://medium.com/sojo-stories/what-do-the-toronto-pan-am-games-2015-have-to-do-with-social-enterprise-b41e60d7acc4
Kreshpaj, B., Orellana, C., Burström, B., Davis, L., Hemmingsson, T., Johansson, G., Kjellberg, K., Jonsson, J., Wegman, D. H., & Bodin, T. (2020). What is precarious employment? A systematic review of definitions and operationalizations from quantitative and qualitative studies. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 46(3), 235–247. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3875
Loosemore, M. (2016). Social procurement in UK construction projects. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.10.005
Lysons, K., & Farrington, B. (2006). Purchasing and supply chain management (7th ed.). Pearson Education.
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE). (n.d.-a). Government Procurement Charter. https://www.procurement.govt.nz/procurement/principles-charter-and-rules/government-procurement-charter/
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE). (n.d.-b). Removing barriers for New Zealand businesses. Retrieved from https://www.procurement.govt.nz/broader-outcomes/increasing-access-for-new-zealand-businesses/
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE). (2017a). Briefing for the incoming minister. http://cera. govt.nz/sites/default/files/common/cera-briefing-for-the-incoming-minister-december-2011-20120202.pdf
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE). (2017b). Māori in the labour market. https://www.mbie. govt.nz/assets/c71b557b32/2017-monitoring-report-maori-in-the-labour-market.pdf
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE). (2019). Government procurement rules—Rules for sustainable and inclusive procurement (4th ed.). www.procurement.govt.nz
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE). (2020a). Māori in the labour market - June 2020 quarter (unadjusted). (June), 14–16.
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE). (2020b). Supplier diversity to increase through new procurement targets for Māori businesses. https://www.procurement.govt.nz/about-us/news/supplier-diversity-to-increase-through-new-procurement- targets-for-maori-businesses/
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE). (2021). Government procurement principles. https:// www.procurement.govt.nz/procurement/principles-charter-and-rules/government-procurement-principles/
Ministry of Foreign Affairs & Trade. (n.d.). Government procurement. https://www.mfat.govt.nz/en/trade/free- trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements-in-force/ comprehensive-and-progressive-agreement-for-trans-pacific-partnership-cptpp/understanding-cptpp/ government-procurement/
Mccrudden, C. (2004). Using public procurement to achieve social outcomes. In Natural Resources Forum (Vol. 28). www.ams.mod.uk/ams/content/docs/toolkit/ams/policy/ mcm/
McNeill, J. (2015). Insights into social procurement: From policy to practice. http://socialprocurementaustralasia. com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/SPA-Insights-From- Policy-to-Practice-2015FINAL.pdf.
Moewaka Barnes, H. M. (2009). The evaluation hikoi: A Māori overview of programme evaluation. Communities, (February), 1–39.
Mupanemunda, M. (2019). Social procurement through purchasing expenditure. Brotherhood of St Laurence 2017), 1–12. https://apo.org.au/node/261161
Nash, S., & Jackson, W. (2020). Increase to supplier diversity through new procurement target for Māori Business. Beehive.govt.nz. https://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/ increase-supplier-diversity-through-new-procurement-target-maori-business
Pool, I. (2015). Colonization and development in New Zealand between 1769 and 1900: The seeds of Rangiatea. Demographic transformation and socio-economic development series (Vol. 3). Springer.
Short, S. (2021). Understanding a Tiriti-based approach to social procurement. University of Otago.
Simmons, L. (2017, March). Economic justice. In Encyclopedia of social work on-line (pp. 1–27). National Association of Social Workers Press and Oxford University Press. http://socialwork.oxfordre. com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.001.0001/ acrefore9780199975839-e-1266?print=pdf
Simpson, P. M., Siguaw, J. A., & White, S. C. (2002). Measuring the performance of suppliers: An analysis of evaluation processes. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 38(4), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1745-493X.2002.tb00118.x
Statistics New Zealand. (2020). Child poverty statistics: Year ended June 2019. https://www.stats.govt.nz/information- releases/child-poverty-statistics-year-ended-june-2019
Supply Nation. (2018). Supply Nation today launched a social return on investment (SROI) report. https://supplynation. org.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Supply-Nation- launches-a-Social-Return-on-Investment-Report.pdf
Tadelis, S. (2012). Public procurement design: Lessons from the private sector. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 30(3), 297–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ijindorg.2012.02.002
Te Matarau A Māui. (n.d.). Iwi, Māori collectives and Māori business growth. http://www.tematarau.co.nz/strategy/ iwi-maori-collectives-and-maori-business-growth/
Toronto City Council. (2016). City of Toronto Social Procurement Program. http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/ mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-91818.pdf
Toronto2015. (2015). TO2015: Spend data since inception in January 01, 2010. http://images.toronto2015.org/system/ asset_pdfs/1414/original/to2015-procurement-spend- data.pdf
Te Puni Kōkiri (TPK). (2021). Suppliers (Māori businesses). https://www.tpk.govt.nz/en/a-matou-kaupapa/maori- economic-resilience/progressive-procurement/suppliers- maori-businesses
Troje, D., & Andersson, T. (2020). As above, not so below: Developing social procurement practices on strategic and operative levels. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion, (2013). https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-03-2020-0054
Troje, D., & Kadefors, A. (2018). Employment requirements in Swedish construction procurement–institutional perspectives. Journal of Facilities Management, 16(3), 284–298. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFM-09-2016-0038
Trust Tairāwhiti. (2020). Te Tairāwhiti region’s economic recovery—How can we bounce back better? https://www.trusttairawhiti.nz/news/te-tairawhiti-regions- economic-recovery-how-can-we-bounce-back-better/
Wisner, J., Tan, K., & Leong, G. (2012). Principles of supply chain management: A balanced approach (3rd ed.). Cengage Learning.
How to Cite
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.