“Without Losing What We Know”: Dissenting social work in the context of epochal crises
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol34iss3id921Keywords:
Decolonization, Anti-oppressive practice and theory, Critical Reflection, Critical social work, Social work and the state, Nancy FraserAbstract
INTRODUCTION: This article builds on Fraser’s (2021, 2019) argument that the overlapping crises of social reproduction, climate, economy, and public health have resulted in a splintering of the hegemony of dominant groups. This generates a “wilding of the public sphere” in which groups urgently seek counter-hegemonic storylines and alternative solutions to interwoven crises (Fraser, 2021, n.p.). This article further theorises consent and dissent in social work practice and workplaces.
METHODS: Data were collected using qualitative interviews and a convenience sample of ten executive directors and managers of social services in a large city in Canada. Data were analysed using a constant comparison method involving multiple readings of the field notes and transcripts, until patterns and themes could be discerned.
FINDINGS: The article analyses three themes, namely, dissent as: 1) working on the edges of the state; 2) working on decolonisation including what it means to be a settler; and 3) critical reflection. The themes are then discussed together under a final interwoven theme that is argued to reflect new hegemonies, in particular political world-making, building new emancipatory knowledges, theory, practice and hegemonies.
CONCLUSION: Social-justice-engaged practices can emerge within systems hostile to social solidarity, suggesting that dissent is resilient to neoliberalism though it may sometimes operate quietly and at the level of individual practice. This resistance and the nascent, shared, dissenting narratives can contribute to the de-legitimatisation of oppressive social structures as social workers search for, and build, more emancipatory approaches.
References
Ackroyd, S. & Thompson, P. (2022). Organisational Misbehaviour. (2nd ed.). Sage.
Atallah, D. G., Bacigalupe, G., & Repetto, P. (2019). Centering at the margins: Critical community resilience praxis. Journal of Humanistic Psychology [Advanced access]. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167818825305
Baines, D. (2021). Soft cops or social justice activists: Social work’s relationship to the state in the context of BLM and neoliberalism. The British Journal of Social Work, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcab200
Baines, D. (2017). An overview of anti-oppressive social work practice: Neoliberalism, inequality and change. In D. Baines (Ed.), Doing anti-oppressive practice. Social justice social work (3rd ed.; pp. 31–50). Fernwood.
Baines, D., & Cunningham, I. (2020). How could management let this happen? Gender, participation, and industrial action in the nonprofit sector. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 41(2), 436–456.
Baskin, C. (2021). Sovereignty, colonization and resistance: 150 years of social work with indigenous peoples [Address]. Fredricton, NB: University of St. Thomas. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vkaCq2WWUFU
Barnoff, L. (2017). Business as usual: Doing anti-oppressive organizational change. In D. Baines (Ed.), Doing anti- oppressive practice: Social justice social work (3rd ed.; pp. 172–192). Fernwood Press.
BC Campus Open Publishing. (2020). Indigenization, decolonization, and reconciliation. https://opentextbc. ca/indigenizationcurriculumdevelopers/chapter/ indigenization-decolonization-and-reconciliation/
Bennett, B., & Gates, T. (2019). Teaching cultural humility for social workers serving LGBTQI Aboriginal communities in Australia. Social Work Education, 38(5), 604–617.
Connell, R. (2014). Using southern theory: Decolonizing social thought in theory, research and application. Planning Theory, 13(2), 210–223.
Fook, J., & Askeland, G. A. (2006). The “critical” in critical reflection. In J. Fook (Ed). Critical reflection in health and social care pp. 40–53). Sage.
Fraser, N. (2019). The old is dying and the new cannot be born. Verso.
Fraser, N. (2021). Climates of capital. New Left Review, 127 (Jan–Feb), n.p.
Garrett, P. (2021). “A world to win”: In defense of (dissenting) social work—A response to Chris Maylea, The British Journal of Social Work [Advanced access]. https://doi. org/10.1093/bjsw/bcab009
Garrett, P. M. (2019). What are we talking about when we talk about “Neoliberalism”? European Journal of Social Work, 22(2), 188–200.
Gramsci, A. (2000). The Gramsci reader: Selected writings, 1916–1935. NYU Press.
Green, S., & Baldry, E. (2008). Building indigenous Australian social work. Australian Social Work, 61(4), 389–402.
Green, S., & Bennett, B. (2018). Wayanha: A decolonised social work. Australian Social Work, 71(3), 261–264.
Harris, J. (2018). Managing state social work: Front-line management and the labour process perspective. Routledge.
Here to Help. (2019). Housing glossary. BC Partners for Mental Health and Substance Use Information. https://www.heretohelp.bc.ca/visions/housing-and- homelessness-vol4/housing-glossary
Hyslop, I. (2018). Neoliberalism and social work identity. European Journal of Social Work, 21(1), 20–31.
Kennedy Kish, B., Sinclair, R., Carniol, B., & Baines, D. (2017). Case critical. The dilemma of social work in Canada (7th ed.). Between the Lines.
Lawler, J. (2018). The rise of managerialism in social work. In E. Harlow, & J. Lawler (Eds). Management, social work and change (pp. 33–56). Routledge.
Mafile’o, T., & Vakalahi, H. F. O. (2018). Indigenous social work across borders: Expanding social work in the South Pacific. International Social Work, 61(4), 537–552.
Maylea, C. (2021). The end of social work. The British Journal of Social Work, 51(2), 772–789. https://doi. org/10.1093/bjsw/bcaa203
McNabb, D. (2019). Decolonising social work education in Aotearoa New Zealand. Advances in Social Work and Welfare Education, 21(1), 35–50.
Mosby, I. (2021). Canada’s Residential Schools were a horror. Scientific American. https://www. scientificamerican.com/article/canadas-residential- schools-were-a-horror/
Morley, C., Macfarlane, S., Ablett, P. (2017) The neoliberal colonisation of social work education: A critical analysis and practices for resistance. Advances in Social Work and Welfare Education, 19(2), 25–40.
Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. (2015). Honouring the truth, reconciling for the future. Author. https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2015/trc/ IR4-7-2015-eng.pdf
Norris, T. (2021). Memorialization, decolonization, and schools: Memorializing forced forgetting. Brock Education Journal, 31(1), 1–6.
Peck, J., Brenner, N., & Turner, N. (2018). Actually existing neoliberalism. In D. Cahill, M. Cooper, M. Konings, & D Primrose (Eds.) The SAGE handbook of neoliberalism (pp. 3-15). SAGE.
Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2019). Still neoliberalism? South Atlantic Quarterly, 118(2), 245–265.
Pete, S. (2016). 100 Ways: Indigenizing & decolonizing academic programs. Aboriginal Policy Studies, 6(1), 11–20.
Plehwe, D. (2016). Neoliberal thought collectives: Integrating social science and intellectual history. In D. Cahill, M. Cooper, M. Konings, & D. Primrose (Eds.), Handbook of neoliberalism (pp. 89–100). Sage.
Rubenstein, D. (2020, June 7). De Blasio vows for first time to cut funding for the N.Y.P.D. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/07/nyregion/deblasio- nypd-funding.html
Sherraden, M. (2020). Social work and the future of policing: Key points for changes in policy and practice. Centre for Social Development.
Sinclair, R. (2016). The Indigenous child removal system in Canada: An examination of legal decision-making and racial bias. First Peoples Child & Family Review, 11(2), 8–18.
Smith, K. (2017). Occupied spaces: Unmapping standardized assessments. In D. Baines (Ed.), Doing anti-oppressive practice: Social justice social work (pp. 272–288). Fernwood Press.
Snelgrove, C., Dhamoon, R., & Corntassel, J. (2014). Unsettling settler colonialism: The discourse and politics of settlers, and solidarity with Indigenous nations. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 3(2), 1–32.
Spolander, G., Engelbrecht, L., & Pullen Sansfaçon, A. (2015). Social work and macro-economic neoliberalism: Beyond the social justice rhetoric. European Journal of Social Work, 19(5), 634–649.
Starfield, S. (2015). Ethnographic research. In B. Patridge & A. Phakiti (Eds.), Research methods in applied linguistics: A practical resource (pp. 137–152). Bloomsbury.
Tascon, S., & Ife, J. (2020). Disrupting whiteness in social work. Routledge.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
First publication
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
Copyright
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.
