From dissent to authoritarianism: What role for social work in confronting the climate crisis?

Authors

  • Joe Whelan School of Social Work and Social Policy, The University of Dublin, Trinity College.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol34iss3id927

Keywords:

Climate, climate justice, social justice, dissent, social work, social policy, welfare states.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: As the environmental crisis deepens and the effects begin to emerge in the form of disruptive and destructive climate events, more nation-states have ostensibly committed to carbon net zero by 2050. Achieving this target will require a major reconstitution of economies, societies and, thus, the lived realties of peoples. This reconstitution or shift will need to occur most forcibly and rapidly in the developed economies of the global north whom, since about 1850, have been responsible for approximately 92% of surplus global emissions. Social policies, therefore, will need to be reworked and reimagined so that, in practice, they are aligned with “planetary boundaries”. Recent geopolitical summits, such as COP 26, have, arguably, resulted in lacklustre and vague commitments rather than any serious attempts at creating agreement on how to reconstitute the economies of the global north. Moreover, a model of economy predicated on continuous, and exponential growth and thus the continued metabolization of the natural environment, still appears immovable despite the threat it poses.

APPROACH, ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION: It is against the backdrop of the global context described above that two questions are posed. The first is concerned with creating a focus for social work and asks: “What sustainable social policies should social work align with?”. The answer to this is presented as a means of progressing the task of social work in the context of climate justice. The second question builds on the answer to the first and asks, “Does arriving at an adequate response require dissent?”

Author Biography

Joe Whelan, School of Social Work and Social Policy, The University of Dublin, Trinity College.

Dr Joe Whelan is a Assistant Professor of Social Work at Trinity College Dublin. He previously worked in the School of Applied Social Studies, University College Cork. Joe is an active social researcher with a developing track record of publishing in international, peer-reviewed, scholarly journals. Joe's main area of research interest focuses on exploring the nexus of work and welfare. He is particularly interested in exploring and understanding lived experiences in the context of welfare recipiency, focusing on the processes and effects of welfare conditionality. Joe has recently published a monograph with a further one one on the way. The first of these explores the concept of social deservingness from antiquity to the present day and the second, which will be published in April 2022, offers an insight into lived experiences in the context of the Irish welfare state.

References

Australian Association of Social Workers (AASW). (2004). Acknowledgement statement to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. National Bulletin, 14(1), 21

Agamben, G. (1998). Homo sacer: Sovereign power and bare life. Stanford University Press.

Atkinson, A. B. (1996). The case for a participation income. The Political Quarterly, 67(1), 67–70.

Bailey, D. (2020). Re-thinking the fiscal and monetary political economy of the green state. New Political Economy, 25(1), 5–17.

Baumberg, B. (2015). The stigma of claiming benefits: a quantitative study. Journal of Social Policy, 45(2), 181–99.

Boetto, H., Bowles, W., Närhi, K., & Powers, M. (2020). Raising awareness of transformative ecosocial work: Participatory action research with Australian practitioners. International Journal of Social Welfare, 29, 300–309.

Bolton, R., Whelan, J., & Dukelow, F. (2022). What can welfare stigma do? Social Policy and Society, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746422000185

Bonvin, J.-M. (2012). Individual working lives and collective action. An introduction to capability for work and capability for voice. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 18(1), 9–18.

Bonvin, J.-M., & Laruffa, F. (2018). Human beings as receivers, doers and judges. The anthropological foundations of sustainable public action in the capability approach. Community, Work and Family, 21(5), 502–518.

Bonvin, J.-M., & Laruffa, F. (2021). Towards a capability- oriented eco-social policy: elements of a normative framework. Social Policy and Society, 1–12. https://doi. org/10.1017/S1474746421000798

Brake, M., & Bailey R. (Eds.). (1980). Radical Social Work and Practice. Edward Arnold.

Burchardt, T., & Hick, R. (2018). Inequality, advantage and the capability approach. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 19(1), 38–52.

Burkett, P. (1999). Marx and nature: A red and green perspective. Palgrave Macmillan.

Bywaters, P., Featherstone, B., & The Child Welfare Inequalities Project Team. (2020). The Child Welfare Inequalities Project: Final Report. University of Huddersfield.

Coote, A. (2021). Towards a sustainable welfare state: The role of universal basic services. Social Policy and Society, 1–11.

Coote, A., & Percy, A. (2020). The case for universal basic services. Polity Press.

Corrigan, P., & Leonard, P. (1978). Social work practice under capitalism: A Marxist approach. Macmillan.

Czyzewski, K., & Tester, F. (2014). Social work, colonial history and engaging indigenous self-determination. Canadian Social Work Review / Revue Canadienne de Service Social, 31(2) 211–226.

Dillon, J., Evans, F., & Wroe, L. E. (2021). Covid-19: changing fields of social work practice with children and young people. Critical and Radical Social Work, 9(2), 289–296.

Dominelli, L. (2014). Promoting environmental justice through green social work practice: A key challenge for practitioners and educators. International Social Work, 57(4), 338–345.

Drolet, J., Wu, H., Taylor, M., & Dennehy, A. (2015). Social work and sustainable social development: teaching and learning strategies for “green social work” curriculum. Social Work Education, 34(5), 528–543.

Fanning, A. L., O’Neill, D. W., & Büchs, M. (2020). Provisioning systems for a good life within planetary boundaries. Global Environmental Change, 64, https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102135.

Feldman, G. (2021). Disruptive social work: Forms, possibilities and tensions. The British Journal of Social Work. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcab045

Ferguson, I. (2008). Re-claiming social work: Challenging neo-liberalism and promoting social justice. Sage.

Ferguson, I., & Woodward, R. (2009). Radical social work. Making a difference. Policy Press.

Fook, J. (1993). Radical social work: A theory of practice. Allen and Unwin.

Fronek, P., & Chester, P. (2016). Moral outrage: Social workers in the third space. Ethics and Social Welfare, 1–14.

Galper, J. (1980). Social work practice: A radical perspective. Prentice-Hall.

Garrett, P. M. (2021). Dissenting social work. Routledge.

Gough, I. (2017). Heat, greed and human need: Climate change, capitalism and sustainable wellbeing. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Gough, I. (2022). Two scenarios for sustainable welfare: A framework for an eco-social contract. Social Policy and Society, 21(3). pp. 460-472.

Gray, C. (2019). “You look a little bit dark for my liking”: Maori and Pasifika women’s experiences of welfare receipt in Aotearoa New Zealand. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 31(1), 5–16.

Harris, C., & Boddy, J. (2017). The natural environment in social work education: A content analysis of Australian social work courses. Australian Social Work, 70(3), 337–349.

Healy, K. (2000). Social work practices: Contemporary perspectives on change. Sage.

Hick, R., & Murphy, M. P. (2021). Common shock, different paths? Comparing social policy responses to COVID-19 in the UK and Ireland. Social Policy & Administration, 55, 312– 325.

Holbrook, A. M., Akbar, G. L., & Eastwood, J. (2019). Meeting the challenge of human-induced climate change: Reshaping social work education. Social Work Education, 38, 955–967.

Hyslop, I. (2018). Neoliberalism and social work identity. European Journal of Social Work, 21(1), 20–31.

Ife, J. (1997). Rethinking social work: Towards a critical practice. Longman.

Ife, J. (2018). Right-wing populism and social work: Contrasting ambivalences about modernity. Journal of Human Rights and Social Work, 3, 121–127.

International Federation of Social Workers (IFSW. (2022). Global definition of social work. https://www.ifsw.org/ what-is-social-work/global-definition-of-social-work/

International Federation of Social Workers (IFSW). (2022). The role of social workers in advancing a new eco-social world. https://www.ifsw.org/the-role-of-social-workers-in- advancing-a-new-eco-social-world/

Jacobs, M. D. (2009). White mother to a dark race: Settler colonialism, maternalism, and the removal of indigenous children in the American West and Australia, 1880–1940. University of Nebraska Press.

Koch, M. (2021). Social policy without growth: Moving towards sustainable welfare states. Social Policy and Society, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S1474746421000361

Krumer-Nevo, M. (2016). Poverty-aware social work: A paradigm for social work practice with people in poverty. British Journal of Social Work, 46(6), 1793–1808.

Laruffa, F. (2020). What is a capability-enhancing social policy? Individual autonomy, democratic citizenship and the insufficiency of the employment-focused paradigm. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 21(1), 1–16.

Laruffa, F., McGann, M., Murphy, M. (2021). Enabling participation income for an eco-social state. Social Policy and Society, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S1474746421000750

Lavalette, M. (Ed.). (2011). Radical social work today. Social work at the crossroads. Policy Press.

Lucas-Darby, E. T. (2011). The new color is green: Social work practice and service-learning. Advances in Social Work, 12, 113–125.

Lynch, D., Lathouras, A., & Forde, C. (2021). Community development and social work teaching and learning in a time of global interruption. Community Development Journal, 56(4), 566–586.

Maglajlic, A. R., & Ioakimidis, V. (2021). Social work and the quest for environment justice: A call to action. The British Journal of Social Work, 51(8), 2869–2871.

Malier, H. (2019). Greening the poor: The trap of moralization. British Journal Sociology, 70, 1661–1680.

Marx, K. (1867/2013). Das kapital. Wordsworth. McGann, M. (2021). “Double activation”: Workfare meets

marketisation. Administration, 69 2), 19–42.

Mittiga, R. (2021). Political legitimacy, authoritarianism, and climate change. American Political Science Review, 1–14.

Mullaly, B. (2002). Challenging oppression: A critical social work approach. Oxford University Press.

Mullaly, R. (1993). Structural social work: Ideology, theory and practice. McClelland and Stewart.

Noble, C. (2016). Green social work: The next frontier for action. Social Alternatives, 35(4), 14–19.

Oxfam. (2022). Inequality kills. The unparalleled action needed to combat unprecedented inequality in the wake of COVID-19: Report. https://www.oxfam.org/en/ research/inequality-kills

Patrick, R. (2017). For whose benefit: The everyday realties of welfare reform. Policy Press.

Philip, D., & Reisch, M. (2015). Rethinking social work’s interpretation of “environmental justice”: From local to global. Social Work Education, 34(5), 471–483.

Price, R. (1772). An appeal to the public, on the subject of the national debt. https://macsphere.mcmaster.ca/ bitstream/11375/14773/1/fulltext.pdf

Ranta-Tyrkkö, S., & Närhi, K. (2021). Striving to strengthen the ecosocial framework in social work in Finland. Community Development Journal, 56(4), 608–625.

Robinson, K., Briskman, L., Mayar, R. (2021). Disrupting human rights: A social work response to the lockdown of social housing residents. The British Journal of Social Work, 51(5), 1700–1719.

Sen, A. (1985). Well-being, agency and freedom: The Dewey lectures 1984. The Journal of Philosophy, 82(4), 169–221.

Sen, A. (1987). The standard of living. The Tanner lectures on human values 1985. In G. Hawthorn (Ed.), The standard of living (pp. 1–38). Cambridge University Press.

Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Knopf.

Sen, A. (2004). Inequality reexamined. Oxford University

Press.

Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. Allen Lane.

Sen, A. (2013). The ends and means of sustainability. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 14(1), 6–20.

Smith, L. (2014). Historiography of South African social work: Challenging dominant discourses. Social Work/ Maatskaplike Werk, 50(2) pp. 305-313.

Teixeira, S., & Krings, A. (2015). Sustainable social work: An environmental justice framework for social work education. Social Work Education, 34(5), 513–527.

The Promise Scotland. (2021). Plan 21–24. https:// thepromise.scot/ plan-21-24/

Turbett, C. (2014). Doing radical social work. Palgrave Macmillan.

Walker, G. (2012). Environmental justice: Concepts, evidence and politics. Routledge.

Whelan, J. (2021a). Work and thrive or claim and skive: Experiencing the “toxic symbiosis” of worklessness and welfare recipiency in Ireland. Irish Journal of Sociology, 29(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0791603520957203

Whelan, J. (2021b). Specters of Goffman: Impression management in the Irish welfare space. Journal of Applied Social Science, 15(1), 47–65. https://doi. org/10.1177/1936724420983578

Whelan, J. (2021c). We have our dignity, yeah? Scrutiny under suspicion: Experiences of welfare conditionality in the Irish social protection system. Social Policy & Administration, (55), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/ spol.12610

Whelan, J. (2021d). Welfare, deservingness and the logic of poverty: Who deserves? CSP.

Whelan, J. (2022a). On your Marx...? A world to win or the dismantlement of a profession? On why we need a reckoning. The British Journal of Social Work, 52(2), 1168–1181. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcab132

Whelan, J. (2022b). Hidden voices: Lived experiences in the Irish welfare space. Policy Press.

Downloads

Published

2022-09-24

How to Cite

Whelan, J. (2022). From dissent to authoritarianism: What role for social work in confronting the climate crisis?. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 34(3), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol34iss3id927

Issue

Section

Original Articles