Pūao-te-Ata-tū and dissenting voices of change at New Zealand’s oldest school of social work
Keywords:Bi-cultural Social Work, Ethnocentric Practices, Cultural Racism, Institutional Racism, pūao-te-Ata-tū
INTRODUCTION: The Ministerial Advisory Committee Report on a Māori Perspective for the New Zealand Department of Social Welfare (1986) offers an historic reference point from which to examine education and training reforms initiated at Aotearoa New Zealand’s oldest school of social work and designed to better address the needs and aspirations of Māori and those working with Māori. Pūao-te-Ata-tū is an internationally unique example of social research facilitated by distinguished Māori leaders and senior government officials using indigenous methods. The Vice Chancellor of Victoria University was approached in 1986 along with its new Professor of Social Work about becoming drivers of Pūao-te-Ata-tū Recommendation 10(c) to “assess the extent to which tertiary social work courses are meeting cultural needs for those public servants seconded as students to the courses”. The early passing of alumnus- Elder John Rangihau, shortly after Pūao-te-Ata-tū was published, left a legacy—acknowledged posthumously by the Council of Victoria University in 1989—when a senior Te Rangihau Scholar teaching and research position was established with Ngāi Tūhoe. A decade of reform in social work education and research at Victoria University saw important movement towards supporting and promoting Māori perspectives in the delivery of community social services in three New Zealand regions.
IMPLICATIONS: Five lessons learned about partnerships from the Victoria University experience are highlighted as issues that promote cultural responsiveness in support of Māori whānau, tamariki and rangatahi. The Wellington programme closed at the start of the new millennium without addressing the VUW Council relationship with Ngāi Tūhoe, highlighting broken promises.
Becroft, A. (2021). Our care and protection system has failed – It needs nothing less than radical transformation. Press release of the Office of the Children’s Commissioner, October 19, 2021. Office of the New Zealand Children’s Commissioner. https://www.childrenandyoungpeople.org.nz/publications/media-releases/our-care-and- protection-system-has-failed-it-needs-nothing-less-than- radical-transformation/.
Bradley, J. (1997). Iwi and cultural social services policy: The state’s best kept secret. Te Komako-Social Work Review, 8(1), 3–5.
Bradley, R. (1997). Pūao- te-Ata-tū: He manako te koura I kore ai –The paradigm shift fusing fiscal responsibility and tino rangatiratanga in the new millennium. Te Komako-Social Work Review, 8(1), 18–19.
Cairns, T., Fulcher, L. C., Kereopa, H., Nia, P. and Tait- Rolleston, W. (1998). Nga pari karangaranga o Pūao- te-Ata-tū: Towards a culturally responsive education & training for social workers in New Zealand. Canadian Social Work Review, 15(2), 145–167.
Cheng, D. (2020, November 25). Oranga Tamariki boss Grainne Moss and her stark admission of “structural racism”. New Zealand Herald. https://www.nzherald. co.nz/nz/politics/oranga-tamariki-boss-grainne- moss-and-her-stark-admission-of-structural-racism/ ql7rozi26o2dlh6g3456wwhkpu/
Children, Young Persons, and Their Families Act, New Zealand Parliament, No. 24 Stat. (1989).
Crenshaw, K. (2019). On intersectionality: The essential writings of Kimberlé Crenshaw. The New Press.
Davis, A. Y. (1983). Women, race & class. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.
Department of Social Welfare. (1994). Te Punga: Our bicultural strategy for the nineties. Government Printer.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Seabury.
Fulcher, L. C. (1988). Putting the baby back in the bathwater: Rethinking the practice curriculum in social work education. New Zealand Social Work, 12(3–4), 4–9.
Fulcher, L. C., & Ainsworth, F. (1994). Child welfare abandoned? Ideology and the economics of contemporary service reform in New Zealand. Social Work Review, 6(5), 2–13.
Leberman, S. (2006). Transfer of learning from the classroom to the workplace: A longitudinal case study of case managers. In S. Leberman, L. McDonald, & S. Doyle (Eds.), The transfer of learning: Participants’ perspectives of adult education and training (pp. 61–71). Gower Publishing.
Leigh, J. (1998). Communication for cultural competence. Allyn & Bacon.
Mason, J. (Producer). (1999). Towards a culturally responsive social work practice for Aotearoa. https:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZLQ7Y3m7QfI.
Mason, K. (1992). Review of the Children, Young Persons, and Their Families Act, 1989: Report of the Ministerial Review Team to the Minister of Social Welfare. Department of Social Welfare.
Ministerial Advisory Committee on a Maori Perspective for the Department of Social Welfare. (1986). Pūao- te-Ata-tū (daybreak): The report of the Ministerial Advisory Committee on a Maori perspective for the Department of Social Welfare. Department of Social Welfare. http://ndhadeliver.natlib.govt.nz/delivery/ DeliveryManagerServlet?dps_pid=IE35576520.
Moon, P. (2003). Tohunga: Hohepa Kereopa. David Ling Publishing.
Moreton-Robinson, A. (2002). Talkin’ up to the white woman: Indigenous women and feminism. University of Queensland Press.
Moxon, T. (2020, November 27). Oranga Tamariki head admission of structural racism good, but government needs to start changing things/Interviewer: S. Fergusson. Morning report, Radio New Zealand. https://www.rnz.co.nz/audio/ player?audio_id=2018774448.
Office of the Children’s Commissioner. (2020a). Te kuku o te manawa: Ka puta te riri, ka momori te ngākau, ka heke ngā roimata mo tōku pēpi [Report one of two]. https://www.occ.org.nz/assets/Uploads/TKTM- JUNE2020-Final-print.pdf.
Office of the Children’s Commissioner. (2020b). Te kuku o te manawa: Moe ararā! Haumanutia ngā moemoeā a ngā tūpuna mō te oranga o ngā tamariki [Report two of two]. https://www.occ.org.nz/assets/Uploads/Te-Kuku-O-Te- Manawa-Report-2-OCC.pdf.
Office of the Ombudsman. (2020). He take kōhukihuki, A matter of urgency: Investigation report into policies, practices and procedures for the removal of newborn pēpi by Oranga Tamariki, Ministry for Children. https://www.ombudsman.parliament.nz/sites/default/ files/2020-10/He_Take__K%C5%8Dhukihuki_A_Matter_ of_Urgency-OT_Report-102020-DIGITAL.pdf.
Pere, R. R. (1992). Ako: Concepts and learning in the Māori tradition: Paper no. 17, Department of Sociology. Waikato University.
Pere, R. R. (1993). Te Wheke. Ao Ako Global Learning NZ.
Ramsden, I. (1997). Cultural safety: Implementing the concept. In P. te Whaiti, M. McCarthy, & A. Durie (Eds.), Mai I Rangiatea: Māori wellbeing and development Auckland University Press.
Radio New Zealand. (2021, January 25). Racism in Oranga Tamariki not over yet, says Lady Moxon. National news: Te aō Māori. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/ national/435120/racism-in-oranga-tamariki-not-over-yet- says-lady-moxon.
Rangihau, J. (1981). Being Māori. In M. King (Ed.), To Ao Hurihun: The world moves on (pp.. Longman Paul.
Richardson, R. (1991). Budget 1991. NZ Government. Royal Commission on Social Policy. (1988). April report:
Volumes 1-5. New Zealand Government.
Tait-Rolleston, W., Cairns, T., Fulcher, L. C., Kereopa, H., & Nia Nia, P. (1997). He koha kii – na kui ma, na koro ma: A gift of words from our ancestors. Social Work Review, 9(4), 30–36.
Tapiata, W., & Ruwhiu, L. (1995). He Korerorero. Social Work Review, 7(1), 31-35.
Television New Zealand. (2019, July 16). “By Māori, for Māori”: Oranga Tamariki hui reveals Māori want to look after their own. 1 News. https://www.tvnz.co.nz/one- news/new-zealand/m-ori-oranga-tamariki-hui-reveals- want-look-after-their-own.
Te Whāiti, P., McCarthy, M., & Durie, A. (1997). Mai i Rangiātea: Māori wellbeing and development. Auckland University Press.
Walker, H. (1995). Where is Pūao-te-Ata-tū and the Department of Social Welfare? Social Work Review, 7(1), 12–16.
Whānau Ora Commissioning Agency. (2020). Ko te wā whakawhiti: It’s time for change. A Māori inquiry into Oranga Tamariki – Report. https://whanauora.nz/ assets/62879b6bdf/ot-review-report.pdf.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.