Against a bitter tide: How a small UK charity operationalises dissent to challenge the “hostile environment” for migrant children and families
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol34iss3id938Keywords:
Dissent, social work, migrant rights, charity sector, undocumented childrenAbstract
INTRODUCTION: Dissent is currently under political and ideological assault in the UK and immigration has long been a target for those looking to quell dissenting practices. At the same time, dissent appears increasingly out of place in the contemporary social work context in England. Yet, as the authors argue, dissent is codified within the professional and ethical standards that social workers in England must adhere to.
APPROACH: This article introduces the work of a small UK Charity, Together with Migrant Children, and applies to it key facets of the theoretical basis for dissent through case study and practice-based reflections on challenges in immigration policy and opportunities for dissenting practice.
IMPLICATIONS: The authors set out the challenges and opportunities for dissent in practice in statutory, non-statutory and wider community development settings, illustrating how dissent can bring individual ‘success’ that is located within a cumulative structural and tactical change that points to dissent and its practice as a necessary feature of democracy.
References
Alcock, P., & Craig, G. (Eds.). (2009). International social policy: Welfare regimes in the developed world. Palgrave Macmillan.
Anitha, S. (2010). No recourse, no support: State policy and practice towards South Asian women facing domestic violence in the UK. British Journal of Social Work. 40(2), 462–479. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcn160
British Association of Social Workers (BASW). (2018.) Professional capabilities framework. https://www.basw. co.uk/social-work-training/professional-capabilities- framework-pcf
British Association of Social Workers (BASW). (2021). The code of ethics for social work: Statement of principles. http://cdn.basw.co.uk/upload/basw_112315-7.pdf. https://www.basw.co.uk/about-basw/code-ethics
Briskman, L. (2013). Courageous ethnographers or agent of the state: Challenges for social work. Critical and Radical Social Work: An International Journal, 1, 51–66. https:// doi.org/10.1332/204986013X665956
Burgess, S. (2013). Outing courtesy: The role of rude dissent in rule of law systems. Law & Social Inquiry, 38(1), 206–214.
Cemlyn, S., & Briskman, L. (2003). Asylum, children’s rights and social work. Child & Family Social Work, 8, 163– 178. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2206.2003.00281.x
Collett, J. (2004). Immigration is social work issue. In D. Hayes (Ed.), Social work, immigration and asylum: Debates, dilemmas and ethical issues for social work and social care practice (pp. 77–95). Jessica Kingsley.
Connor, N. (2017). The continuing duty under s.17 CA. [https://www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/child- protection/309-children-protection-features/35119-the- continuing-duty-under-s-17-ca?tmpl=component
Dickson, E., & Rosen, R. (2021). “Punishing those who do the wrong thing”: Enforcing destitution and debt through the UK’s family migration rules. Critical Social Policy, 41(4), 545–565. https://doi. org/10.1177/0261018320980634
Elgot, J. (2018, April 17). Theresa May’s “hostile environment” at heart of Windrush scandal. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/ apr/17/theresa-mays-hostile-environment-policy-at-heart- of-windrush-scandal (Accessed 14 February 2022).
Ellul, R., McCarthy, R., & Haith-Cooper, M. (2020). Destitution in pregnancy: Forced migrant women’s lived experiences. British Journal of Midwifery, 28(11), 778–787. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2020.28.11.778
Falk, B. (2009). The lessons of history—learning from history: Why we need dissent and dissidents. International Journal, 64(1), 243. https://doi. org/10.1177/002070200906400120
Farmer, N. (2021). “I never felt like an illegal immigrant until social work turned up at the hospital”: No recourse to public funds as necropolitical exception. The British Journal of Social Work, 51(8), 3301–3318. https://doi. org/10.1093/bjsw/bcaa151.
Freire, P. (1968, 2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th anniversary ed.). Continuum.
Guentner, S., Lukes, S., Stanton, R., Vollmer, B. A., & Wilding, J. (2016). Bordering practices in the UK welfare system themed section: Welfare chauvinism. Critical Social Policy, 36(3), 391–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018315622609
Hackney Migrant Centre, Migrant Rights Network, NELMA, Together with Migrant Children, and Akwaaba (2019) Section 17 Support: A guide for families. https://www. togethermigrantchildren.org.uk/_files/ugd/92f2b7_e9560b898f1b484a86eb19d792809715.pdf
Hayes, D. (2013). Asylum seekers and refugees. In A. Worsely, T. Mann, A. Olsen, & E. Mason-Whitehead (Eds.), Key concepts in social work practice (pp. 25–29). Sage.
Huish, R. (2013). Dissent 101: Teaching the "dangerous knowledge" of practices of activism. Revue Canadienne D'études Du Développement, 34(3), 364–383. https:// doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2013.809334
Humphries, B. (2004). An unacceptable role for social work: Implementing immigration policy. British Journal of Social Work, 34(1), 93–107. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/ bch007
Ife, J. (2001). Human rights and social work: Towards rights- based practice. Cambridge University Press.
International Federation of Social Workers. (2014). Global definition of social work. https://www.ifsw.org/what-is- social-work/global-definition-of-social-work/
Jolly, A. (2018a). “You just have to work with what you’ve got”: Practitioner research with precarious migrant families. Practice, 30(2), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1080 /09503153.2017.1385756
Jolly, A. (2018b). No recourse to social work? Statutory neglect, social exclusion and undocumented migrant families in the UK. Social Inclusion, 6(3), 190–200. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v6i3.1486
Jolly, A. (2019). From the Windrush Generation to the “Air Jamaica generation”: Local authority support for families with no recourse to public funds. Social Policy Review, 31. https://doi.org/10.1332/ policypress/9781447343981.003.0006
Jolly, A., Thomas, S., & Stanyer, J. (2020), London’s children and young people who are not British citizens: A profile. London, United Kingdom, Mayor of London. https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/final_londons_children_and_young_people_who_are_not_british_citizens.pdf
Jolly, A., & Thompson, J. L. (2022). Risk of food insecurity in undocumented migrant households in Birmingham, UK. Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1093/ pubmed/fdab408
Kumar, R. (2019). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Ledwith, M. (2016). Community development in action: Putting Freire into practice. Bristol University Press.
Mckee, K., Leahy, S., Tokarczyk, T., & Crawford, J. (2021). Redrawing the border through the “Right to Rent”: Exclusion, discrimination and hostility in the English housing market. Critical Social Policy, 41(1), 91–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018319897043
Morales, D. (2020). Dissent in Immigration. Law, Culture and the Humanities, 16(2), 250–267. https://doi. org/10.1177/1743872117715225
Patel, J. (2021). The role of dissent, conflict, and open dialogue in learning to live together harmoniously. Educational Philosophy and Theory [Ahead-of-print], 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2021.2006057
Project 17. (2019). Not seen, not heard: Children’s experiences of the hostile environment https://drive. google.com/file/d/1zsVpKqJ0hohTLJjV4KDPuQppwQnq neeN/view?usp=embed_facebook
Public Law Project. (n.d.). Exceptional case funding. Public Law Project. https://publiclawproject.org.uk/exceptional- case-funding/
Robinson, K., & Masocha, S. (2017). Divergent practices in statutory and voluntary-sector settings? Social work with asylum seekers. British Journal of Social Work, 47(5), 1517–1533. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcw105
Sigona, N., & Hughes, V. (2012). No way out, no way in: Irregular migrant children and families in the UK. University of Oxford.
Social Work England. (2020). Professional standards guidance. https://www.socialworkengland.org.uk/ standards/professional-standards-guidance/
Southall Black Sisters. (2018). Time’s up: No collusion with immigration deportations. https://southallblacksisters.org. uk/news/no-collusion-immigration-deportations/
Taylor, D. (2019, November 5). Charity says sorry for giving rough sleepers’ details to Home Office. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/nov/05/ charity-st-mungos-says-sorry-for-giving-rough-sleepers- details-to-home-office
Tedam, P. (2020). Anti-oppressive social work practice (1st ed.). Learning Matters.
Tully, J.H. (2005). On law, democracy and imperialism. Paper presented at the twenty-first annual Public Lecture Centre for Law and Society, University of Edinburgh. March 10–11.
Walawalkar, A. (2021). Home Office signs charities up to scheme that could lead to deportations of rough sleepers. https://libertyinvestigates.org.uk/articles/home- office-signs-up-charities-to-scheme-that-could-lead-to- deportation-of-rough-sleepers/
Williams, C., & Briskman, L. (2015). Reviving social work through moral outrage. Critical and Radical Social Work, 3(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1332/20498601 5X14225321433375
Worthing, K., Galaso, M., Wright, J., & Potter, J. (2021). Patients or passports? The “hostile environment” in the NHS. Future Healthcare Journal, 8(1). https://doi. org/10.7861/fhj.2021-0007
York, S. (2018). The “hostile environment”: How Home Office immigration policies and practices create and perpetuate illegality. Journal of Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Law, 32(4). https://kar.kent.ac.uk/69444/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
First publication
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
Copyright
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.
