Dissent against ‘Definition debates’ about Social Work
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol34iss3id945Keywords:
social work, definition of social work, definitional debate, social work knowledge(s)Abstract
This commentary dissents against definition debates. I argue that ongoing discussion about what social work is needs to find a common ground of recognition. Arguments about the bifurcation, demise or “end of social work” are challenged. Starting with the position that social work operates on a necessarily contested and contradictory space, the case is made for a shared definition of social work as a “mediator in the social”. To stand up as a foundational definition for the diversity of social work worldwide, “mediation in the social” as described by Philp (1979) requires important updates to fit the complex “socials” of the 21st century. This necessitates a shift from the inclusion of Indigenous knowledge as an add-on to expansively identifying indigenous knowledge as a constant that underpins social work internationally. This definition needs to be founded on shared values and assumptions that capture the essence of social work such as citizenship, relational practices, human rights and social justice as expressed in diverse cultural contexts worldwide.
References
Bywaters, P., Brady, G., Bunting, L., Daniel, B., Featherstone, B., Jones, C., Morris, K., Scourfield, J., Sparks, T., Webb, C. (2018). Inequalities in English child protection practice under austerity: A universal challenge? Child & Family Social Work, 23, 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12383
Corrigan, P., & Leonard, P. (1978). Social work practice under capitalism: A Marxist approach. Macmillan.
Eketone, A., & Walker S. (2013). Kaupapa Māori social work research. In M. Gray, J. Coates, M. Yellowbird, & T. Heatherington (Eds.), Decolonizing social work (pp. 259–270). Ashgate.
Ferguson, I., Ioakimidis, V., & Lavlette, M. (2018). Global social work in a political context: Radical Perspectives. Policy Press.
Garrett, P. M. (2021). “A world to win”: In defence of (dissenting) social work—A response to Chris Maylea. The British Journal of Social Work, 51(4), 1131–1149. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcab009
Gray, M., Coates, J., & Hetherington, T. (2016a). Hearing indigenous and local voices in mainstream social
work. In M. Gray, J. Coates, & M. Yellowbird (Eds.), Indigenous social work around the world (pp. 257–269). Routledge.
Gray, M., Coates, J., & Yellowbird, M. (2016b). Indigenous social work around the world: Towards culturally relevant education and practice. Routledge.
Gray, M., Coates, J., Yellowbird, M., & Heatherington, T. (2013). Decolonizing social work. Ashgate.
Hauss, G., & Schulte, D (2009). Amid social contradiction, towards a history of social work in Europe. Barbara Bundrich.
Hunt, S. (2016). The social work professionalisation project before the 1990s in Aotearoa New Zealand: The dream. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 28(3), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol28iss3id245
Hunt, S. (2017). The social work regulation project in Aotearoa New Zealand. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 29(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj- vol29iss1id370
Hyslop, I. (2013). Social work practice knowledge: A enquiry into the nature of the knowledge generated and applied in the practice of social work [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Albany Campus, New Zealand: Massey University.
Hyslop, I. K. (2016). Social work in the teeth of a gale: A resilient counter-discourse in neoliberal times. Critical and Radical Social Work, 4(1), 21–37.
Hyslop, I., Hay, K., & Beddoe, L. (2018). What we’re reading. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 30(1), 1–6. https:// doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol30iss1id494
Hyslop, I., & Keddell, E. (2018). Outing the elephants: A new paradigm for child protection social work. Social Sciences, 7(7), 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/ socsci7070105
Iamamoto, N. V., Mônica dos Santos, C., & Aparecida Leite Toffanetto Seabra Eiras, A. (2021). Social work in Latin America: Historical factors, memory and international connections [Special issue]. Critical and Radical Social Work, 9(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1332/20498602 1X16115145109789
Jones, R. (2014). The best of times, the worst of times: Social work and its moment. The British Journal of Social Work, 44(3), 485–502. https://doi.org/10.1093/ bjsw/bcs157
Kamali, M., & Jönsson, J. H. (2019). Revolutionary social work: Promoting sustainable justice [Special issue]. Critical And Radical Social Work, 7(3), 293–314. https:// doi.org/10.1332/204986019X15688881109268
Marthinsen, E. (2019) Neoliberalisation, the social investment state and social work. European Journal of Social Work, 22(2), 350–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2018. 1538102
Maylea, C. (2021). The end of social work. The British Journal of Social Work, 51(2), 772–789. https://doi. org/10.1093/bjsw/bcaa203
McGregor, C. (2015). History as a resource for the future: A response to “Best of times, worst of times: Social work and its moment.” The British Journal of Social Work, 45(5), 1630–1644. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bct197
McGregor, C. (2019). A paradigm framework for social work theory for early 21st century practice. The British Journal of Social Work, 49(8), 2112–2129. https://doi. org/10.1093/bjsw/bcz006
McGregor, C., & Millar, M. (2020). A systemic lifecycle approach to social policy practice in social work: Illustrations from Irish child welfare and parenting research and practice. The British Journal of Social Work, 50(8), 2335–2353. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/ bcaa194
McGregor, C., & Dolan, P. (2021). Protection and support across the lifecourse: A practical approach for social workers. Policy Press.
Mulally, R. (1993). The new structural social work. Oxford University Press.
Parker, J. (2020). Descent or dissent? A future of social work education in the UK post-Brexit. European Journal of Social Work, 23(5), 837–848. http://doi.org/10.1080/1369 1457.2019.1578733
Parton, N. (1991). Governing the family. Macmillan Education.
Philp, M. (1979). Notes on the form of knowledge in social work. The Sociological Review 27(1), 83-111. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1979.tb00326.x
Rojek, C. (1986). The subject in social work. British Journal of Social Work, 16(1), 65–77.
Ruwhiu, P. (2019). Te Whakapakari Ake I te Mahi: Mana-enhancing practice engagement with social work students and practitioners. In R. Munford & K. O’Donoghue (Eds.), New theories for social work practice: Ethical practices for working with individuals, families and communities (pp. 195–211). Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Sewpaul, V. (2013). Community work and the challenges of neoliberalism and new managerialism. In
A. K. Larsen, V. Sewpaul, & G. O. Hole (Eds.), Participation in community work: International perspectives (pp. 217–229). Routledge.
Skehill, C. (2004). History of the present of child protection and welfare social work in Ireland. Edwin Mellen Press.
Walsh-Tapiata, W. (2016). The past, the present and the future: The New Zealand indigenous experience of social work. In M. Gray, J. Coates, & M. Yellowbird (Eds.), Indigenous social work around the world (pp. 107–115). Routledge.
Whelan, J. (2022). On your Marx...? A world to win or the dismantlement of a profession? On why we need a reckoning. The British Journal of Social Work, 52(2), 1168–1181. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcab132
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
First publication
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
Copyright
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.
