Mandatory reporting: ‘A policy without reason’.
Keywords:child protection, mandatory reporting, prevention, public health
This viewpoint explores the recommendation to introduce mandatory reporting from the recent report into the case of Malachi Subecz, a child who was killed by his caregiver. I argue that this policy would have unintended consequences. It is likely to flood the system with low risk cases, which could make identification of high risk cases more difficult. It reduces a focus on prevention; intensifies resources and power within Oranga Tamariki; and does not take into account either the complexity of issues causing abuse and harm, nor their widespread nature. This policy is also likely to exacerbate inequities for Māori, as bias is more likely to impact low risk reports. Currently, people may not report due to a lack of clarity around the type and severity of cases they should report, and limited or inadequate responses to previous reports made, not because they are unable to recognise the signs of abuse or are unwilling to act on them. Instead, we should keep a strong focus on prevention and devolution, while also urgently generating a clear consensus between Oranga Tamariki and key reporters about when, why, how and what the outcomes of reporting should be. Alternative recommendations are suggested.
Ainsworth, F. (2002). Mandatory reporting of child abuse and neglect: Does it really make a difference? Child & Family Social Work, 7(1), 57-63. https://doi.org/https://doi. org/10.1046/j.1365-2206.2002.00228.x
Harvey, B., Gupta-Kagan, J., & Church, C. (2021). Reimagining schools’ role outside the family regulation system. Columbia Journal of Race and Law, 11(3), 575–610. https://doi.org/10.52214/cjrl.v11i3.8745
Ho, G. W. K., Gross, D. A., & Bettencourt, A. (2017). Universal mandatory reporting policies and the odds of identifying child physical abuse. American Journal of Public Health, 107(5), 709-716. https://doi.org/10.2105/ ajph.2017.303667
Keddell, E., & Hyslop, I. (2019). Ethnic inequalities in child welfare: The role of practitioner risk perceptions. Child & Family Social Work, 24(4), 209-420. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12620
Levi, B.J. (2021). Mandated reporters need training on context, critical thinking. Imprint Magazine, Youth News. https://imprintnews.org/child-welfare-2/mandatory- reporters-training-context-critical-thinking/53308
Melton, G. (2005). Mandatory reporting: A policy without reason. Child Abuse and Neglect, 29, 9 - 18.
Office of the Chief Social Worker. (2022). Ko te huarahi pono. Oranga Tamariki. https://www.orangatamariki.govt.nz/ assets/Uploads/About-us/Performance-and-monitoring/ Reviews-and-Inquiries/Practice-review-Malachi- Subecz-and-whanau/Ko-te-huarahi-pono-ka-watea-kia- whakamana-kia-whakatika.pdf
Poutasi, K. (2022). Ensuring strong and protective safety nets: Joint review into the Children’s
Sector. Oranga Tamariki. https://www.orangatamariki.govt.nz/assets/ Uploads/About-us/Performance-and-monitoring/ Reviews-and-Inquiries/System-review-Dame-Karen- Poutasi/Final-report-Joint-Review-into-the-Childrens- Sector.pdf
Waitangi Tribunal. (2021). He pā harakeke, he rito whakakīkinga whāruarua oranga tamariki urgent inquiry WAI 2915. Waitangi tribunal. https://forms.Justice.Govt. Nz/search/documents/wt/wt_doc_171027305/he%20 paharakeke%20w.Pdf.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.