How well does social work education in Aotearoa New Zealand prepare social workers to work with people claiming welfare benefits and what could be done better?
Keywords:
social work education, welfare benefit advocacy, welfare benefit scenarios, neoliberalism, poverty aware paradigm, solidarityAbstract
INTRODUCTION: In Aotearoa New Zealand these people have eligibility for a range of welfare benefit entitlements. The Aotearoa New Zealand welfare benefit system has been subject to neoliberal reform and is judgmental, monocultural, punitive and complex. Without advocacy support people are unlikely to access all of their welfare benefit entitlements. It is therefore essential that social workers are highly knowledgeable about the welfare benefit system. This article summarises initial exploratory research that asked the question – how well does social work education in Aotearoa New Zealand prepare social workers to work with people claiming welfare benefits?
RESEARCH METHODS: The research used reflexive thematic analysis. The flexibility of this method allowed for a constructionist epistemology, a critical theoretical perspective and a critical ethnographic methodology. Eight semi-structured interviews were conducted with recent social work graduates. Each interview included realistic welfare benefit advocacy scenarios.
FINDINGS: The data strongly indicated social work education curricula does not adequately address welfare benefit issues. Consequently social workers are unlikely to competently support people to access all their benefit entitlements. Furthermore, there is a significant gap in the literature regarding this issue. A poverty-aware paradigm and use of realistic welfare benefit advocacy scenarios within social work education is recommended.
References
Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers. (n.d.). What is social work? https://www.anzasw.nz/about-us/ what-is-social-work/#:~:text=Social%20work%20is%20 a%20practice,are%20central%20to%20social%20work.
Baker, T., & Davis, C. (2017). Everyday resistance to workfare: Welfare beneficiary advocacy in Auckland, New Zealand. Social Policy and Society, 17(4), 535–546. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1474746417000306
Ballantyne, N., Beddoe, L., Hay, K., Maidment, J., & Walker, S. (2022). Resarch brief: The development of a Professional Capabilities Framework for social work in Aotearoa New Zealand. Aotearoa New Zealand Journal of Social Work, 34(2), 81–89.
Beddoe, L., & Keddell, E. (2016). Informed outrage: Tackling shame and stigma in poverty education in social work. Ethics and Social Welfare, 10(2), 149–162. https://doi.or g/10.1080/17496535.2016.1159775
Bennett, P. (2012, February 28). Welfare reform legislation to be introduced [Press release]. https://www.beehive.govt. nz/release/welfare-reform-legislation-be-introduced
Bernard, H. R. (2013). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Sage.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676x.2019.1628806
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage.
Brinkmann, S. (2018). The interview. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (5th ed., pp. 576–599). Sage.
Chereni, A. (2016). Advocacy in the South African social welfare sector: Current social work research and possible future directions. International Social Work, 60(2), 507–520. https://doi. org/10.1177/0020872815580042
Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Allen & Unwin.
Darroch, J. (2017). Social justice: What the social work profession’s commitment means in practice [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Auckland.
Fenton, J. (2021). The “undeserving” narrative in child and family social work and how it is perpetuated by “progressive neoliberalism”: Ideas for social work education. Societies, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/ soc11040123
Freire, P. (2017). Pedagogy of the oppressed (M. B. Ramos, Trans.). Penguin books. Original published in 1970.
Gray, C., & Crichton-Hill, Y. (2019). “You look a little bit dark for my liking”: Maori and Pasifika women’s experiences of welfare receipt in Aotearoa New Zealand. Aotearoa New Zealand Journal of Social Work, 31(1), 5–16.
Harrington, A. (Ed.). (2005). Modern social theory: An introduction. Oxford University Press.
Hyslop, I. K. (2016a). Neoliberalism and social work identity. European Journal of Social Work, 21(1), 20–31. https:// doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2016.1255927
Hyslop, I. K. (2016b). Where to social work in a brave new neoliberal Aotearoa? Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 28(1), 5–12.
Hyslop, I. K., & Keddell, E. (2018). Outing the elephants: Exploring a new paradigm for child protection social work. Social Sciences, 7(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/ socsci7070105
Keddell, E. (2017). The vulnerable child in neoliberal contexts: The construction of children in the Aotearoa New Zealand child protection reforms. Childhood, 25(1), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568217727591
Krumer-Nevo, M. (2016). Poverty-aware social work: A paradigm for social work practice with people in poverty. British Journal of Social Work, 46(6), 1793–1808. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcv118
Krumer-Nevo, M., Weiss-Gal, I., & Monnickendam, M. (2009). Poverty-aware social work practice: A conceptual framework for social work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 45(2), 225–243. https://doi.org/10.5175/ jswe.2009.200600144
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (2010). The communist manifesto. Penguin Group.
Morley, C., Ablett, P., & Stenhouse, K. (2019). Technicist education: Paving the way for the rise of the social work robots? Critical and Radical Social Work, 7(2), 139–154.
Morley, C., Macfarlane, S., & Ablett, P. (2017). The neoliberal colonisation of social work education: A critical analysis and practices for resistance. Advances in Social Work and Welfare Education, 19(2), 25–40. https://doi. org/10.3316/aeipt.219527
Morton, K., Gray, C., Heins, A., & Carswell, S. (2014). Access to justice for beneficiaries: A community law response. Community Law Canterbury.
Neuwelt-Kearns, C., Nicholls, A., Deane, K. L., Robinson, H., Lowe, D., Pope, R., Goddard, T., van der Schaaf, M., & Bartley, A. (2021). The realities and aspirations of people experiencing food insecurity in Tāmaki Makaurau.
Kōtuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online, 17(2), 135–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/1177083x.2021.1951779
O’Brien, M., Bradford, S., Dalziel, P., Stephens, M., Walters, M., & Wicks, W. (2010). Welfare justice for all. Reflections and recommendations: A contribution to the welfare reform debate. C. A. N. Zealand.
Rebstock, P., Dupuis, A., Gorman, D., Isaac, C., McPherson, K., Ratahi-Pryor, E., Roberts, A., & Wilson-Davis, S. (2011). Reducing long-term benefit dependency: Recommendations. Welfare Working Group.
Russell, A. (2015). Radical community development: We do talk politics here. Whanake: The Pacific Journal of Community Development, 1(1), 58–64. https://www. unitec.ac.nz/whanake/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/ Radical-Community-Development-by-ALASTAIR- RUSSELL.pdf
Russell, A. (2017). Competent solidarity: The alternative for professional social work. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 29(2), 137–144. https://doi.org/10.3316/ informit.337957590716694
Russell, A. (2022). How well does social work education prepare social workers to work with people claiming welfare benefits and what could be done better? Auckland University of Technology. http://hdl.handle. net/10292/15891
Russell, A., & Bradford, S. (2022). Solidarity in action: Welfare advocacy handbook. http://kotare.org.nz/solidarity-in-action-welfare-advocacy-handbook/
Saar-Heiman, Y., & Gupta, A. (2020). The poverty-aware paradigm for child protection: A critical framework for policy and practice. The British Journal of Social Work, 50(4), 1167–1184. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcz093
Saar-Heiman, Y., Lavie-Ajayi, M., & Krumer-Nevo, M. (2017). Poverty-aware social work practice: Service users’ perspectives. Child & Family Social Work, 22(2), 1054–1063. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12325
Stephens, M. (2019). Social security and welfare law in Aotearoa New Zealand. Thomson Reuters New Zealand.
Terry, G., Hayfield, N., Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. In C. Willig & W. S. Rogers (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology (pp. 17–37). Sage.
Timor-Shlevin, S., & Benjamin, O. (2020). The tension between managerial and critical professional discourses in social work. Journal of Social Work, 21(4), 951–969. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017320949359
Welfare Expert Advisory Group. (2019). Whakamana tāngata: Restoring dignity to social security in New Zealand.
Work and Income. (n.d.). Benefit rates at 1 April 2022. https://www.workandincome.govt.nz/products/benefit- rates/benefit-rates-april-2022.html
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
First publication
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
Copyright
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.
