Abortion counselling controversies and the precarious role of social work: Research and reflections from Aotearoa New Zealand


  • Letitia Meadows University of Canterbury, Christchurch, Aotearoa New Zealand


Abortion counselling, social work, controversy, boundary object


INTRODUCTION: This article presents debates and controversies about counselling within abortion provision in Aotearoa New Zealand. Formal and informal counselling networks are described, where the role of social workers as providers of counselling services is precarious. Insights consider how service users may be more holistically supported when accessing abortion care.

METHODS: Drawing on findings from a broader qualitative research project involving interviews, formal and informal observation of practices, and analysis of service documentation, the concept of boundary objects by Star and Griesemer (1989) is used to account for diverse abortion counselling practices. Revisiting these findings in the context of current abortion legislation and developments, a Reproductive Justice (RJ) lens is used to inform the implications for service users and social work practice.

FINDINGS: Efforts within legislation, policy, and practice guidelines to standardise abortion counselling have not prevented different versions of counselling from being enacted by social workers, counsellors, nurses, and other pregnancy-related professionals, resulting in the contestation of counselling. Participant accounts and observations revealed that multiple disciplines offer counselling practices while social work remains poorly integrated into service provision.

CONCLUSION: This article employs the concept of boundary objects to account for how variations of counselling have been enacted and disputed. The addition of a reproductive justice (RJ) lens with its attention to social justice is used to appreciate recent advances in access to abortion services alongside arguing for enriched care practices and the value of social work in supporting the integrated well-being and agency of service users.


Abortion Supervisory Committee. (1998). Standards of practice for the provision of counselling. Counselling Advisory Committee, April 1998.

Abortion Supervisory Committee. (2018). Standards of care for women requesting abortion in Aotearoa New Zealand: Report of a Standards Committee to the Abortion Supervisory Committee. https://www.environmentcourt.govt.nz/assets/Standards-of-Care-2018.pdf

Abortion Supervisory Committee. (2020). Report of the Abortion Supervisory Committee for 2020 presented to the House of Representatives pursuant to Section 39 of the Contraception, Sterilisation, and Abortion Act 1977. [Parliamentary Rept.]. New Zealand Parliament. https:// www.justice.govt.nz/assets/ASC-Annual-Report-2020.pdf

Allanson, S. (2007). Pregnancy/abortion counselling: False providers, mandatory counselling. Women Against Violence: An Australian Feminist Journal (19), 5–9. https:// search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.728436785115575

Bassett, I. C. (2001). Liability of health professionals for a breach of the abortion law of New Zealand. The New Zealand Medical Journal, 114(1145), 557–558.

Beddoe, L. (2022). Reproductive justice, abortion rights and social work. Critical and Radical Social Work, 10(1), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1332/204986021X16355170868404

Booysen, P., & Staniforth, B. (2017). Counselling in social work: A legitimate role? Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 29(1), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol29iss1id214

Bowker, G .C., & Star, S. L. (1990). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. MIT Press.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Bryant, A. G., & Swartz, J. J. (2018). Why crisis pregnancy centers are legal but unethical. AMA Journal of Ethics 20(3), 269–277. https://doi.org/10.1001/journalofethics.2 018.20.3.pfor1-1803

Cannold L. (2002). Understanding and responding to anti- choice women-centred strategies. Reproductive health matters, 10(19), 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0968- 8080(02)00011-3

Chiweshe, M., Mavuso, J., & Macleod, C. (2017). Reproductive justice in context: South African and Zimbabwean women’s narratives of their abortion decision. Feminism & Psychology, 27(2), 203– 224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353517699234

Contraception, Sterilisation and Abortion Act 1977 (Parliamentary Counsel Office of New Zealand. 1977). Contraception, Sterilisation, and Abortion Act 1977 No 112 (as at 01 July 2022), Public Act Contents – New Zealand Legislation

Dixon, A. (2012). Authorisation of abortion for a “serious danger to mental health”: Would the practice stand up to the judicial test? Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 43(2), 289–320.

Hannah, C., Cook, C., & Manea, T. (2019, July 1). Women- centred abortion care: Legitimising a disenfranchised aspect of healthcare. Nursing Praxis in Aotearoa New Zealand. https://doi.org/10.36951/NgPxNZ.2019.005

Hoggart, L. (2015). Abortion counselling in Britain: Understanding the controversy. Sociology Compass, 9(5), 365-378. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12256.

Kirk, S., Beddoe, L., & Chinnery, S. A. (2018). An investigation of the nature of termination of pregnancy counselling within the current system of licensed facilities. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 30(3), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol30iss3id511

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0191622893.001.0001

Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. Routledge.

Le Grice, J. (2014). Māori and reproduction, sexuality education, maternity, and abortion [Doctoral thesis, The University of Auckland]. https://researchspace.auckland. ac.nz/handle/2292/23730

Le Grice, J. S., & Braun, V. (2017). Indigenous (Māori) perspectives on abortion in New Zealand. Feminism & Psychology, 27(2), 144–162. https://doi. org/10.1177/0959353517701491

Liamputtong, P. (2009). Qualitative data analysis: Conceptual and practical considerations. Health Promotion Journal of Australia 20(2). https://doi.org/10.1071/HE09133

Macfarlane, E., Stitely, M., & Paterson, H. (2023). What skills do New Zealand clinicians have to provide first trimester abortion in primary care and are they willing? Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare, 35, 100810. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.srhc.2022.100810

Marecek, J., Macleod, C., & Hoggart, L. (2017). Abortion embedded and embodied in social relations: Challenges for feminist psychology. Feminism & Psychology, 27(2), 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353517704877

Mavuso, J., Macleod, C., & du Toit, R. (2023). Directive counselling undermines “safe” abortion. In T. Morison & J. Mavuso (Eds.) Sexual and reproductive justice: From the margins to the centre (pp 247-266). Lexington Books.

Meadows, L. (2016). Controversies, instabilities and (re) configurations: an actor-network account of abortion in Christchurch, New Zealand. http://dx.doi.org/10.26021/4988

Ministry of Health. (2022). Standard for abortion counselling in Aotearoa New Zealand. https://www.health.govt.nz/ system/files/documents/publications/final_standard_for_ abortion_counselling_28_july_v2.pdf

Ministry of Health. (2023). Abortion Services Aotearoa New Zealand: Annual report 2023. Ratonga Whakatahe i Aotearoa | Abortion Services Aotearoa New Zealand. https://www.health.govt.nz/publication/ratonga-whakatahe-i-aotearoa-abortion-services-aotearoa-new-zealand-annual-report-2023

Murphy, E., & Dingwall, R. (2003). Qualitative methods and health policy research (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi. org/10.4324/9781315127873

Ross, L. (2007). What is reproductive justice? In SisterSong Women of Color Reproductive Health Collective and the Pro-Choice Public Education Project (Eds.), Reproductive justice briefing book: A primer on reproductive justice and social change (pp. 4–5). http://www.protectchoice.org/downloads/ Reproductive%20Justice%20Briefing%20Book.pdf,

Ross, L. J. (2017). Reproductive justice as intersectional feminist activism. Souls, 19(3), 286–314. https://doi.org/1 0.1080/10999949.2017.1389634

Ross, L., & Solinger, R. (2017). Reproductive justice: An introduction. University of California Press.

Rudrum, S. (2022). Student encounters with a campus crisis pregnancy centre: Choice, reproductive

justice and sexual and reproductive health supports. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 47(1), 53-73 https://doi. org/10.29173/cjs29754

Simonds, W. (1996). Abortion at work: ideology and practice in a feminist clinic. Rutgers University Press.

Standards Committee. (2018). Standards of Care for Women Requesting Abortion in Aotearoa New Zealand, https:// www.environmentcourt.govt.nz/assets/Standards-of-Care-2018.pdf

Star, S. L. (1988). The structure of ill-structured solutions: Boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. In Huhns, M. and Gasser, L. (Eds.), Readings in distributed artificial intelligence (37- 54). Kaufman. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-55860-092-8.50006-X

Star, S. L. (1991). Power, technology and the phenomenon of conventions: On being allergic to onions. In Law,

J. (Ed), A sociology of monsters: essays on power, technology and domination (26-56). Routledge

Star, S. L. (2010). This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept. Science, Technology & Human Values, 35(5), 601–617.

Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.

Whitcombe, A., & Norton, C. (2020). How social work services are operating in New Zealand following the introduction of the Abortion Legislation Act 2020. [Webinar]. Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers. Webinar: Social Work and the Abortion Legislation Act 2020 (anzasw.nz)

World Health Organization. ( 2015) . Health worker roles in providing safe abortion care and post-abortion contraception.

World Health Organization. https://iris. who.int/handle/10665/181041

World Health Organisation. (2019). Preventing unsafe abortion: Evidence Brief. WHO-RHR-19.21-eng.pdf

Younes, M., Goldblatt Hyatt. E., Witt, H., & Franklin, C. (2021) A call to action: Addressing ambivalence

and promoting advocacy for reproductive rights in social work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 57(4), 625–635. https://doi.org/10.1080/1043 7797.2021.1895930




How to Cite

Meadows, L. (2023). Abortion counselling controversies and the precarious role of social work: Research and reflections from Aotearoa New Zealand. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 35(4), 73–86. Retrieved from https://anzswjournal.nz/anzsw/article/view/1068