Social work and telehealth
Keywords:
• Social work,, telehealth, Covid 19, ICTAbstract
INTRODUCTION: The Covid-19 pandemic which swept the world in 2020, and the corresponding measures that were adopted in Australia and New Zealand to keep people safe, had a significant impact on health services delivery. While the pandemic led to serious impacts on mental health, financial circumstances and homelessness, for many social workers, the directive to work from home critically affected their ability to deliver services to vulnerable clients needing ongoing support. Telehealth was adopted by many services that had not previously used this mode of service delivery, which enabled social workers to continue to work with clients.
METHOD: Drawing on a narrative review of literature and a mixed method survey of 208 Australian and Aotearoa New Zealand social workers (71% of whom were from New Zealand), this article describes social workers’ experiences in adopting telehealth and their views on how it may continue to be used as a mode of service delivery.
FINDINGS: Social workers note problems such as technology issues, including patchy information and communications technology (ICT) services, particularly in rural areas, and, for some, a necessary reliance on personal equipment; client interactions, including client lack of access to ICT services and equipment; and personal circumstances, including the need to home-school children during the pandemic, and difficulty separating work and personal hours.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite challenges, there was also agreement from many workers that telehealth is a strategy that should be retained because of the benefits for both clients who struggle to attend face-to-face meetings and for workers.
References
Aasback, A.W., & Røkkum, N. H. A. (2021). Domesticating technology in pandemic social work. Journal of Comparative Social Work, 16(2), 172–196.
Aaslund, H. (2021). Global experiences of social work practice during the pandemic: Digital mediums, mutual aid, and professional self-care. Qualitative Social Work, 20(1/2), 375–377.
Abrams, L. S., & Dettlaff, A. J. (2020). Voices from the frontlines: Social workers confront the COVID-19 pandemic. Social Work, 65(3), 302–305.
Alston, M., Irons, K., Boddy, J., Fronek, P., Briggs, L., Adamson, C., Hay, K., Rowlands, A., Hazeleger, T., & Howard, A. (2022). Australian and New Zealand social workers adjusting to the Covid 19 pandemic. British Journal of Social Work. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcB163
Archer-Kuhn, B. (2020). Canadian reflections on the Covid-19 pandemic in social work education: From tsunami to innovation. Social Work Education, 39(8), 1010–1018.
Arthur-Holmes, F., Akaadom, M. K. A., Agyemang-Duah, W., Busia, K. A. & Peprah, P. (2020). Healthcare concerns of older adults during the COVID-19 outbreak in low- and middle-income countries: Lessons for health policy and social work. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 63, 717–723.
Ashley, C., Halcomb, E., James, S., Calma, K., Stephen, C., McInnes, S., Mursa, R., & Williams, A. (2022). The impact of COVID-19 on the delivery of care by Australian primary health care nurses. Health & Social Care in the Community, 30(5), e2670–e2677.
Baker, M., Berens, K. A., Williams, S., Bruer, K. C., Evans, A. D., Price, H. L., (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on social work practice in Canada: A comparison of urban and rural contexts. Journal of Comparative Social Work, 16(2), 142–171.
Banks, S., Cai, T., de Jonge, E., Shears, J., Shum, M., Sobočan, A. M., Strom, K., Truell, R., Úriz, M. J., & Weinberg, M. (2020). Practising ethically during COVID-19: Social work challenges and responses. International Social Work, 63(5), 569–583.
Barsky, A. (2020). Ethical exceptions for social workers in light of the COVID-19 pandemic and physical distancing. The New Social Worker, 27(2). https://www.socialworker.com/feature-articles/ethics-articles/ethical-exceptions-social-workers-in-light-of-covid-19-pandemic-physical-distancing/
Bradford, K. (2016). Telehealth services in rural and remote Australia: A systematic review of models of care and factors influencing success and sustainability. Rural and Remote Health, 16(4). https://www.rrh.org.au/journal/article/3808
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.
Boussat, B., Kamalanavin, K., & François, P. (2018). The contribution of open comments to understanding the results from the hospital survey on patient safety culture (HSOPS): A qualitative study. PLoS One, 13(4), e0196089. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196089
Chan, C., & Au-Yueng, H. (2021). When narrative practice suddenly goes online due to COVID-19. Qualitative Social Work: Research and Practice, 20(1-2), 390–398. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325020981086
Cook, L. L., & Zschomler, D. (2020). Virtual home visits during the COVID-19 pandemic: Social workers’ perspectives. Practice: Social Work in Action, 32(5), 401–408.
Cristofalo, M. A. (2021). Telehealth, friend and foe for health care social work. Qualitative Social Work, 20(1/2), 399–403.
Csoba, J., & Diebel, A. (2020). World-wide closed! Social worker field practice during the “lockdown” period. Social Work Education, 39(8), 1094–1106.
Dauti, M., Dhembo, E., Bejko, E., & Allmuca, M. (2020). Rethinking the transformative role of the social work profession in Albania: Some lessons learned from the response to COVID-19. International Social Work, 63, 640–645.
Disney, L., Mowbray, O., & Evans, D. (2021). Telemental health use and refugee mental health providers following COVID-19 pandemic. Clinical Social Work Journal, 49, 463–470.
Dominelli, L. (2020). A green social work perspective on social work during the time of COVID-19. International Journal of Social Welfare, 30(1), 7–16.
Frey, R., & Balmer, D. (2021). Covid 19 and hospice community palliative care in New Zealand: A qualitative study. Health and Social Care Community. 30(6), 4165–4174.
Gergerich, E., Mallonee, J., Gherardi, S., Kale-Cheever, M., & Duga, F. (2020). Strengths and struggles for families involved in hospice care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care, 1-20. https://www.academia.edu/78227636/Strengths_and_Struggles_for_Families_Involved_in_Hospice_Care_During_the_COVID_19_Pandemic?uc-sb-sw=95934457
Gibson, A., Bardach, S. H., & Pope, N. D. (2020, 2020/10/02). COVID-19 and the digital divide: Will social workers help bridge the gap? Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 63(6-7), 671-673. https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2020.1772438
Harrikari, T., Romakkaniemi, M., Tittinen, L. & Ovaskainen, S. (2021). Pandemic and social work: Exploring Finnish social workers’ experiences through a SWOT analysis. British Journal of Social Work, 51, 1644–1662.
Hollis-English, A. (2015). Theories in Māori social work: Indigenous approaches to working with and for indigenous people. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 27(4), 5–15.
International Federation of Social Workers (IFSW). (2020) Ethical challenges for social workers during COVID-19: A global perspective. https://www.ifsw.org/ethical-challenges-for-social-workers-during-COVID-19-a-global-perspective/
Itzhaki-Braun, Y. (2021). Community social workers’ perspectives on the challenges and opportunities presented by the COVID-19 pandemic. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 91, 714–723.
Kidd, J., Carne, H., Doole, C., & Rae, N. (2021). A critical analysis of te Tiriti o Waitangi application in primary health organisations in Aotearoa New Zealand: Findings from a nationwide survey. Health and Social Care. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13417
Kim, S-H., & Tesmer, O. (2021). Employing telehealth strategies for opioid addiction during COVID-19: Implications for social work health care. Social Work in Health Care. 60(6/7), 499–508.
Mishna, F., Sanders, J. E., Sewell, K. M., & Milne, E. (2021). Teaching note--preparing social workers for the digital future of social work practice. Journal of Social Work Education, 57, 19–26.
Mishna, F., Milne, E., Bogo, M., & Pereira, L. F. (2021). Responding to COVID-19: New trends in social workers’ use of information and communication technology. Clinical Social Work Journal, 49, 484–494.
Pink, S., Ferguson, H., & Kelly, L. (2020). Child protection social work in COVID-19: Reflections on home visits and digital intimacy. Anthropology in Action, 27(3), 27–30.
Reay, R., Kisely, S. R., & Looi, J. C. R. (2021). Better access: Substantial shift to telehealth for allied mental health services during COVID-19 in Australia. Australian Health Review, 45(6), 675–682.
Ren, M., Wang, B., & Rasell, M. (2022). Flexibility and professionalisation: Reflections on adaptions by social work services in China during COVID-19. Practice, 34(2), 87–101.
Te One, A., & Clifford, C. (2021). Tino rangatiratanga and well-being: Māori self determination in the face of Covid-19. Front Sociology, 3(6). https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2021.613340
Werkmeister, B. J., Haase, A. M., Fleming, T., & Officer T. N. (2023). Experiences of the Covid lockdown and telehealth in Aotearoa New Zealand: Lessons and insights from mental health clinicians. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20064791
World Health Organisation (WHO). (2022). WHO Coronavirus dashboard. Accessed on June 30, 2022 from https://covid19.who.int/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
First publication
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
Copyright
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.
