Companion animals, poverty and social work
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol37iss1id1150Keywords:
Companion animals, poverty, social work assessments, social isolationAbstract
INTRODUCTION: A consequence of poverty is social isolation which can be lessened by having a companion animal. It is noted that people experiencing poverty go without food and other material goods to provide for animals in their care.
METHODS: The findings presented in this article are from a doctoral study in which 23 women and five men were interviewed using a qualitative approach. Applied thematic analysis was utilised to identify themes from the data.
FINDINGS: Companion animals provided participants in this study with a sense of security and friendship. The latter was particularly important as it reduced social isolation for participants. When participants had companion animals, they prioritised food for their animals over food for themselves and went without other material goods to care for the needs of their companion animals.
IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: It is important for social workers to recognise the significance of companion animals when working with people living in poverty. Consideration should be given in social work assessments to the role companion animals have in the lives of people living in poverty and to reducing the costs for people in relation to caring for their companion animals.
References
Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers. (2019). Code of ethics. https://www.anzasw.nz/index.cfm//code-of-ethics/
Arluke, A., & Rowan, A. (2020). Underdogs: Pets, people and poverty. The University of Georgia Press.
Ceatha, N. (2020). Learning with dogs: Human–animal bonds and understandings of relationships and reflexivity in practitioner-research. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 32 (4). 77–83. https://anzswjournal.nz/anzsw/article/view/795
Child Poverty Action Group. (2023). Child poverty groups warn next government of hunger and health problems plaguing kiwi children. https://www.cpag.org.nz/media-releases/poverty-groups-warn-next-government-of-hunger-and-health-problems-plaguing-kiwi-children
Duncanson, M., Roy, M., van Asten, H., Oben, G., Wicken, A., Tustin, K., McAnally, H. & Adams, J. (2022). Child Poverty Monitor 2022 Technical Report. NZ Child and Youth Epidemiology Service, University of Otago.
Ensor, J. (2023, November 28). Election 2023 coalition agreement: Christopher Luxon, David Seymour, Winston Peters reveal Government policy, ministers. Newshub. https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2023/11/election-2023-coalition-agreement-live-updates-christopher-luxon-david-seymour-winston-peters-reveal-government-policy-ministers.html
Farmer, P. (2004). An anthropology of structural violence. Current Anthropology, 45(3), 305–325. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/382250
Galtung, J. (1990). Cultural violence. Journal of Peace Research, 27(3), 291–305. http://about.jstor.org/terms.
Garden, E., Caldin, A., Robertson, D., Timmins, J., Wilson, T., & Wood, R. (2014). Speaking for ourselves: The truth about what keeps people in poverty from those who live it. Family 100 Research Project: Auckland City Mission.
https://www.aucklandcitymission.org.nz/what-we-do/research/?tab=4
Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M. & Namey, E. E. (2012). Sage research methods: Applied thematic analysis. Sage. https://www.10.4135/9781483384436
Hodgetts, D., Chamberlain, K., Groot, S., & Tankel, Y. (2014). Urban poverty, structural violence and welfare provisions for 100 families in Auckland. Urban Studies, 1–16. https://www.10.1177/0042098013505885
Hosken, N., & Goldingay, S. (2016). Making sense of different theoretically informed approaches in doing critical social work. In B. Pease, S. Goldingay, N. Hosken, & S. Nipperess (Eds.), Doing critical social work: Transformative practice for social justice (pp. 52–69). Allen and Unwin.
James, B. L., Bates, L., Coleman, T. M., Kearns, R., & Cram, F. (2022). Tenure insecurity, precarious housing and hidden homelessness among older renters in New Zealand. Housing Studies, 37(3), 483–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2020.1813259
Jarldorn, M. (2020). “The thing about animals is they are not judgemental”: Stories and images from formerly incarcerated women about their relationships with companion animals. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 32(4), 69–76. https://anzswjournal.nz/anzsw/article/view/794
Jury, A., Thorburn, N., & Burry, K. (2018). Pet abuse as part of intimate partner violence. National Collective of Women’s Refuges. https://www.petrefuge.org.nz/media/soajptia/2018-womens-refuge-research1.pdf
Matsuoka, A., Sorenson, J., Graham, T. M., & Ferreira, J. (2020). No pets allowed: A trans-species social justice perspective to address housing issues for older adults and companion animals. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 32(4), 55–68. https://anzswjournal.nz/anzsw/article/view/793
Morris, K., Mason, W., Bywaters, P., Featherstone, B., Daniel, B., Brady, G., Bunting, L., Hooper, J., Mirza, N., Scourfield, J., & Webb, C. (2018). Social work, poverty, and child welfare interventions. Child and Family Social Work, 23, 364–372. https://www.10.1111/cfs.12423
Scanlon, L., Hobson-West, P., Cobb, K., McBride, A. & Stavisky, J. (2021). Homeless people and their dogs: Exploring the nature and impact of the human–companion animal bond, Anthrozoös, 34(1), 77–92. https://www.10.1080/08927936.2021.1878683
Schmitz, R. M., Amjadi, S., Tabler, J., & Ishoy, J. (2023). Radical healing in precarity: LGBTQ+ young people’s approaches to life challenges and aspirations through pet caregiving in the context of homelessness. Youth, 3, 50–69. https://doi.org/10.3390/youth3010004
Slatter, J., Lloyd, C., & King, R. (2012). Homelessness and companion animals: More than just a pet? British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 75(8), 377–383. https://www.10.4276/030802212x13433105374350
SPCA New Zealand. (2024). SPCA National desexing programme. https://desexing.spca.nz/about
Stewart, M., Makwarimba, E., Reutter, L, Veenstra, G., Raphael, D., & Love, R. (2009). Poverty, sense of belonging and experiences of social isolation. Journal of Poverty, 13, 173–195. https://www.10.1080/10875540902841762
Topor, D., Ljungqvist, I., & Standberg, E-L. (2016). The costs of friendship: Severe mental illness, poverty and social isolation. Psychosis, 8(4), 336–345. https://www.10.1080/17522439.2016.1167947
Violante, J. (2019). People living in poverty with companion pets: Barriers to access and support [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Ryeson University.
Walker, P., Aimers, J., & Perry, C. (2015). Animals and social work: An emerging field of practice for Aotearoa New Zealand. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 27(1 & 2). 24–35. https://anzswjournal.nz/anzsw/article/view/14
We Love Dogs Charitable Trust. (n.d.). Desexing campaigns. https://www.welovedogs.org.nz/portfolio-item/desexing-program/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
First publication
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
Copyright
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.
