Defining moments in practice. Clinical supervision as a method of promoting critical reflection in fieldwork: A qualitative inquiry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol23iss4id150Keywords:
social work education, field education, supervision,Abstract
In 2008, as coordinator and lecturer of a postgraduate allied mental health programme, I asked clinical supervisors and their supervisees who were completing the programme what their ‘most difficult’ practice scenario taken to supervision had been as part of a research project approved for ethics by Victoria University.
Secondly, I asked clinical supervisees and clinical supervisors about how they had re- solved or dealt with this practice issue. The aim of the research was to determine if the self reflective and reflexive process described by Napier and Fook (2001) and Gardner (2009) was experienced by the social workers and occupational therapists completing their post- graduate studies. The results indicate that for students, through discussing complex and difficult cases in clinical supervision, they came to view their practice both more positively and more self reflectively and reflexively through engagement in clinical supervision. For supervisors, the most difficult scenarios for those who were the students’ line managers involved navigating a mixed role that balanced providing performance feedback in addition to clinical supervision. The implications for clinical supervision as the method of learning in fieldwork education are discussed.
References
Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers. (2008). Code of Ethics, rev. ed. Christchurch: ANZASW.
Baum, N. (2007). Field supervisors’ feelings and concerns at the termination of the supervisory relationship. British Journal of Social Work, 37, 1095-1112.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101.
Gardner, F. (2009). Affirming values: Using critical reflection to explore meaning and professional practice. Reflective Practice, 10(2), 179-190.
Harre-Hindmarsh, J. (1992). Social work oppositions: New graduates’ experiences. Aldershot: Avebury.
Hawkins & Shohet. (1989). Supervision in the helping professions: An individual, group and organizational approach. Buckingham: Open University Press.
McBride, P. (2007). Clinical supervision and the use of structured homework. Mental Health Practice, 10(6), 29-30.
MacDonald, J. (2002). Clinical supervision: A review of underlying concepts and developments. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 36(1), 92.
Napier, L. and Fook, J. (Eds). (2001). Breakthroughs in practice: Theorising critical moments in social work. London: Whiting and Birch.
Pack, M. J. (2009). Supervision as a liminal space: Towards a dialogic relationship. Gestalt Australia and New Zealand Journal, 5(2), 60-77.
Pack, M. J. (2009a). Clinical supervision: An interdisciplinary review with implications for social work. Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 10, 657-668. DOI: 10.1080/14623940903290729.
Pack, M. J. (2010) Making the unseen seen through the use of multi-media approaches in counselling and social work education. Junctures: The Journal for Thematic Dialogue, 13, 69-76
Pack, M. J. (Forthcoming). Two sides to every story: A phenomenological exploration of the meanings of clinical supervision from supervisee and supervisor perspectives. Journal of Social Work Practice.
Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education, 2nd ed. London: Routledge Falmer.
Victoria University Allied Health. (2009). Victoria University Allied Health Student Handbook. Wellington: Graduate School of Nursing Midwifery and Health, VUW.
Wepa, D. (Ed). (2007). Clinical supervision in Aotearoa/New Zealand: A health perspective. Auckland: Pearson Education New Zealand.
Yontef, G. (1996). Supervision from a gestalt therapy perspective. British Gestalt Journal, 5(2), 92-102.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
First publication
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
Copyright
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.
