‘Fit and proper’ and fieldwork: A dilemma for social work educators?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol23iss4id151Keywords:
social work education, field education, field work policies,Abstract
This article will focus on the four major issues that we have identified relating to ‘fit and proper’ policies and fieldwork. The first is the different levels of information that are held and shared by different entities. The second is the potential for such policies to directly contradict the principles of social work, and in particular social justice. Thirdly, it looks at the implications of being in a ‘contracting’ environment, and fourthly the position that social work educators are placed in as the ‘expert’ assessors of risk. Finally, we present some ideas that we hope will instigate a discussion amongst our profession and stakeholders. Throughout the article vignettes show practical applications of the issues that the article raises. While the vignettes are directly based on experiences that we have had while coordinating fieldwork, they do not correspond to specific cases.
References
Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers. (2008). Code of Ethics (rev. ed.). Christchurch: ANZASW.
Barry, M. (2007). Effective approaches to risk assessment in social work: An international literature review. Retrieved from http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2007/08/07090727/0
Cockerman, W. (2011). Sociology of mental disorder (8th edition). USA: Pearson.
Cournoyer, B. (2008). The social work skills workbook. USA: Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning.
Crisp, B. (2006). Gatekeeping or redressing social exclusion: Expectations of social work educators in relation to incarcerated students. Social Work Review, 18(4), 4-11.
Dominelli, L. (2004) Social work: Theory and practice for a changing profession. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Gendall, P. (2006). New Zealanders’ attitudes to mental illness. Palmerston North: Stigma in global context mental health study, Department of Marketing, Massey University.
Gillis, H., & Lewis, J. (2004). Addressing the issue of psychiatric disability in social work interns: the need for a problem-solving framework. Social Work Education 40(3), 391-402.
Haski-Leventhal, D., Gelles, R. and Cnān, R. (2010). Admitting convicted felons to social work programs: Conceptual dilemmas and practices. International Social Work, 53(1), 87-100.
Human Rights Commission (2008). Mental Illness and the Human Rights Act. Retrieved 29 September 2010. http://www.hrc.co.nz/home/hrc/disabledpeople/mentalillnessandhumanrights/mentalillnessandthehumanrightsact.php.
Kean, J. (2007). Professional ethics versus institutional expectations. Social Work Review. 12(2), 37-41.
Magen, R. H., & Emerman, J. (2000). Should convicted felons be denied admission to a social work education program? Yes! Journal of Social Work Education, 36(3), 401–7.
Madoc-Jones, I., Bates, J., Facer, B., & Roscoe, K. (2007). Students with criminal convictions: Policies and practices in social work education. British Journal of Social Work, 37(8), 1387-403.
Marie, D., Fergusson, D., & Boden, J. (2009). Ethnic identity and criminal offending in a New Zealand birth cohort. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 36(3), 354-367.
Ministry of Justice (2011). Obtaining a copy of your criminal record. http://www.justice.govt.nz/services/get-a-copy-of-your-criminal-record.
Ministry of Social Development (2011). Application form fact sheet. www.msd.govt.nz/documents/careers/.../ap-plication-fact-sheet.doc.
Nelson, P., & Cowburn, M. (2010). Social work admissions: Applicants with criminal convictions – the challenge of ethical risk assessment. British Journal of Social Work, 40(4), 1081-1099.
Perry, R. (2004). The impact of criminal conviction disclosure on the self reported offending profile of social work students. British Journal of Social Work, 34(7), 997-1008.
Shardlow, S. (2000). Legal responsbility and liability in field work. In L. Cooper & L. Briggs (eds.). Fieldwork in the Human Services (pp. 117-131). Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
Sheehan, R. (2009). Social work and the law. In Connolly, M., & Harms, L. (Eds). Social work: Contexts and practice. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
Social Workers Registration Act. (2003). Retrieved on 14 November 2011 from http://legislation,.govt.nz.
Social Workers Registration Board (2009). Fit and proper person: Policy statement. Retrieved on 18 August 2011 from http://www.swrb.govt.nz/Policy.html.
Social Workers Registration Board (2008). Code of conduct for social workers. Retrieved on 22 August 2011 from http://www.swrb.govt.nz/CodeOfConduct.html.
Smith, R. (2008). Social work and power. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
Staniforth, B., & Fouche, C. (2006). An Aotearoa primer on ‘fit and proper’ – School version. Social Work Review, 18(4), 11-20.
Statistics New Zealand (2011). Convicted offenders. Table view. Retrieved from http://wdmzpub01.stats.govt.nz/wds/TableViewer/tableView.aspx.
Walker, P. (2010). For better or for worse ... A case study of social services partnerships in Aotearoa/New Zealand. Saarbrucken: Lambert Academic Publishing.
World Health Organisation (2005, December). Promoting and protecting the rights of people with mental disorders, 7 December 2005 - Information Sheet No. 1. Retrieved 29 September 2010. http://www.who.int/mental_health/policy
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
First publication
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
Copyright
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.
