“What’s his is his and what’s mine is his”: Financial power and economic abuse in Aotearoa

Ang Jury, Natalie Thorburn, Ruth Weatherall

Abstract


AIM: This study aimed to understand the experiences and effects of economic abuse for women in Aotearoa New Zealand, particularly in relation to methods of coercive control, with the intention of developing risk matrices to be used by practitioners.

METHODS: We conducted a survey with 448 respondents—with 398 the focus of analysis for this article. The survey contained a combination of scaling and open-ended questions.

FINDINGS: Abusers employed a range of abusive methods to restrict victims’ freedom and exercise domination. These abusive behaviours seemed to follow traditional hegemonic construction of masculinity as synonymous with “provider” in that many of these methods relied on the reproduction of gendered stereotypes which subjugate women to a subordinate position in the household. Women experienced a range of adverse emotional impacts as a result of this abuse.


Keywords


Economic abuse; coercive control; violence; gender; women; domestic violence

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adams, A. E., Sullivan, C. M., Bybee, D., & Greeson, M. R. (2008). Development of the scale of economic abuse. Violence against women, 14(5), 563–588.

Adams, A. E., Beeble, M. L., & Gregory, K. A. (2015). Evidence of the construct validity of the scale of economic abuse. Violence and Victims, 30(3), 363–364. doi:10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-13-00133

Allen, M. (2011). Is there gender symmetry in intimate partner violence? Child and Family Social Work, 16(3), 245–254.

Bell, K. M., & Naugle, A. E. (2008). Intimate partner violence theoretical considerations: Moving towards a contextual framework. Clinical Psychology Review, 28(7), 1096–1107.

Cortis, N., & Bullen, J. (2016). Domestic violence and women’s economic security: Building Australia’s capacity for prevention and redress: Key findings and future directions. Compass, 6.

Domestic Violence Act, § 3 & § 4 (1995). Retrieved from http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1995/0086/latest/DLM372117.html

Gavey, N. (2005, June). Violence against women: Beyond gender neutrality. Paper presented at the Looking Back, Moving Forward Women’s Convention. Wellington, New Zealand.

Hamby, S. Smith, A., Mitchell, K., & Turner, H. (2016) Poly-victimization and resilience portfolios: Trends in violence research that can enhance the understanding and prevention of elder abuse, Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 28(4–5), 217–234. doi:10.1080/08946566.2016.1232182

Heise, L. L. (1998). Violence against women: An integrated, ecological framework. Violence Against Women, 4, 262-290.

Kaspiew, R., Carson, R., & Rhoades, H. (2016). Elder abuse: Understanding issues, frameworks, and responses. Australian Government: Australian Institute of Family Studies (Research Report no. 35). Retrieved from https://aifs.gov.au/publications/elder-abuse

Kelly, J. B., & Johnson, M. P. (2008). Differentiation among types of intimate partner violence: Research update and implications for interventions. Family Court Review, 46(3), 476–499.

Krug, E., Dahlberg, L. L., Mercy, J. A., Zwi, A. B., & Lozano, R. (2002). World report on violence and health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organisation.

Peralta, R. L., & Tuttle, L.A. (2013). Male perpetrators of heterosexual-partner-violence: The role of threats to masculinity. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 21(3), 255–276.

Postmus, J. L., Plummer, S., McMahon, S., Murshid, N. S., & Kim, M. S. (2012). Understanding economic abuse in the lives of survivors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(3), 411–430. doi:10.1177/0886260511421669

Postmus, J. L., Plummer, S., Stylianou, A. M. (2016). Measuring economic abuse in the lives of survivors: Revising the scale of economic abuse. Violence Against Women, 22(6), 692–703. doi:10.1177/1077801215610012

Sanders, C. K. (2015). Economic abuse in the lives of women abused by an intimate partner: A qualitative study. Violence Against Women, 21(1), 3–29. doi:10.1177/1077801214564167

Straus, M. A. (2011). Gender symmetry and mutuality in perpetration of clinical-level partner violence: Empirical evidence and implications for prevention and treatment. Aggression and Violent Behaviour, 16(4), 279–288.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol29iss2id312

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.