Informing for consent: The challenges across language, culture and gender
Keywords:
health social work, informed consent, medical consent, language barriers,Abstract
Requirements to obtain informed consent prior to any significant medical intervention are covered by legislation and, for New Zealand social workers and counsellors, by their codes of ethics. The essential elements of informed consent are effective communication, full information and that it is voluntary and free from coercion. The complexity of obtaining informed consent, when working with language barriers and between cultures is the focus of this paper. An immigrant, Muslim couple was referred to a fertility clinic for treatment. The woman was non-English speaking whilst her husband spoke enough English to get in a tangle. They were insistent that they use the husband’s brother as an interpreter, an accepted and preferred practice within their culture but one which fell short of the requirements for interpretation of medical, clinical and ethical information. Combined with cultural limitations about what a man can discuss with his sister-in-law, the brother’s interpreting was not only inadequate but incorrect and the process silenced the woman’s voice. The paper follows this complex case. It highlights the challenges to obtaining informed consent and identifies the steps taken to provide clear boundaries within which the communication could proceed between all parties and to thus ensure consent was well informed.References
Denholm, N. (2004). Female genital mutilation in New Zealand: Understanding and responding. Auckland: The Refugee Health Education Programme.
Dyckman, J. (1999). The myth of informed consent: an analysis of the doctrine of informed consent and its (mis)application in HIV experiments on pregnant women in developing countries. Columbia Journal of Gender and Law, 9(1), 91-102.
Feld, A. (2004). Informed consent: Not just for procedures anymore. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 99(6), 977-980.
Fertility Associates. (2006). Consents Policy. Auckland: Author.
Health and Disability Commissioner Act 1994.
Health and Disability Commissioner – Te Toihau Hauora, Hauatanga. Unravelling the code: The code of health and disability services consumer’s rights. Significant issues and developments. Retrieved 8 August 2006: http://www.hdc.org.nz/publications/presentations?Unravelling%20the%20Code.
Human Assisted Reproductive Technology Act 2004.
Insoo, H. (2002). Waiver of informed consent, cultural sensitivity, and the problem of unjust families and traditions. The Hastings Center Report, 32(5), 14-24.
Mallardi, V. (2005). The origin of informed consent. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital., 25(5), 312-27.
Marshall, P. (2006). Voluntary participation and informed consent to international genetic research. American Journal of Public Health, 96(11), 1989-1996.
New Zealand Association of Social Workers (1993). Code of Ethics. Wellington: Author.
NZAC (2002). Code of Ethics. N.Z.: New Zealand Association of Counsellors, Te Ropu Kaiwhiriwhiri o Aoetearoa.
Oguz, N.Y. (2003). Research ethics committees in developing countries and informed consent: With special reference to Turkey. Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine, 141(5), 292-296.
Oregon Health and Science University. (2005). Obtaining and documenting Informed consent from subjects with limited English proficiency. Portland: OHSU Research Integrity Office.
Privacy Act 1993.
Reproductive Technology Accreditation Committee. (2002). Guidelines.
The guidelines on the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 (2004). A guide to the rights and freedoms in the Bill of Rights Act for the public sector. Retrieved 25 August 2006 from http://www.justice.govt.nz/pubs/reports/2004/billof-rights-guidelines/section8-11.html.
The Islamic Council of Queensland (1996). Health care providers’ handbook on Muslim patients. Queensland: Author.
Tymchuk, A. (1997). Informing for consent: Concepts and methods. Canadian Psychology, 38(2), 55.
University of Florida Institutional Review Board (2004). Obtaining and documenting informed consent of subjects who do not speak or read English. Health Center IRB Investigator, 7(8).
Smith, D. (2005). Probation and social work. British Journal of Social Work, 35, 621-637.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
First publication
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
Copyright
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.
