Mothers as active contributors to post-earthquake recovery in Christchurch
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol30iss3id496Keywords:
Mothers, Disaster recovery, Christchurch earthquakes, ResilienceAbstract
INTRODUCTION: An understanding of mothers as a subset of women who are active contributors to a recovery effort is crucial to building disaster resilience. This study explored the post-disaster experiences of mothers from the two Christchurch earthquakes in 2010 and 2011 to consider factors which both helped and hindered their recovery.
METHOD: This research was a qualitative study involving semi-structured interviews with six married mothers who were present during the 2010 and 2011 Christchurch earthquakes. Interviews focused on understanding the personal, environmental and psychological impacts of the earthquakes. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.
FINDINGS: Three key findings were established, highlighting: 1) Elements of resilience are essential for recovery; 2) mothers playing a constructive and proactive role in their community post-disaster; and 3) the importance of a sense of belonging to enhance post-disaster recovery.
CONCLUSION: While participants were affected practically and psychologically by the earthquakes, core characteristics of resilience such as positivity, hope, flexibility and adaptability were portrayed in supporting their post-disaster recovery. These mothers played an active role in the recovery of their community and felt a clear sense of belonging which enhanced their recovery.
References
Ariyabandu, M. (2009). Sex, gender and gender relations in disasters. In E. Enarson & P. G. Chakrabarti (Eds.), Women, gender and disaster (pp. 5–17). New Delhi, India: Sage.
Bonner, A., & Tolhurst, G. (2002). Insider–outsider perspectives of participant observation. Nurse Researcher, 9(4), 7–19.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
Chandler, D. (2014). Resilience. The governance of complexity. New York, NY: Routledge.
Chou, Y. J., Huang, H., Lee, C. H., Tsai, S. L., Chen, L. S., & Chang, H. J. (2004). Who is at risk of death in an earthquake? American Journal of Epidemiology, 160(7), 688–695.
Davis, I., & Alexander, D. (2016). Recovery from disaster. London, UK: Routledge.
DeLyser, D. (2001). “Do you really live here?” Thoughts on insider research. Geographical Review, 91(1), 441–453.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Drolet, J., Dominelli, L., Alston, M., Ersing, R., Mathbor, G., & Wu, H. (2015). Women rebuilding lives post-disaster: Innovative community practices for building resilience and promoting sustainable development. Gender & Development, 23(3), 433–448.
Enarson, E. (2009). Gendering disaster risk reduction: 57 steps from words to action. In E. Enarson & P. G. Chakrabarti (Eds.), Women, gender and disaster (pp. 320–336). New Delhi, India: Sage.
Findley, P. A., Pottick, K. J., & Giordano, S. (2017). Educating graduate social work students in disaster response: A real-time case study. Clinical Social Work, 45(2), 159–167.
Gawith, L. (2011). How communities in Christchurch have been coping with their earthquake. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 40(4), 121–130.
Gil-Rivas, V., & Kilmer, R. (2016). Building community capacity and fostering disaster resilience. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 72(12), 1318–1332.
Gordon, L., Sutherland, J., DuPlessis, R., & Gibson, H. (2014). Movers and shakers: Women’s stories from the Christchurch earthquakes. National Council of Women of New Zealand. Retrieved from http://www.communityresearch.org.nz/research/movers-and-shakers-womens-stories-from-the-christchurch-earthquakes-final-version/
Grbich, C. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: An introduction. London, UK: SAGE.
Greene, R., & Greene, D. (2009). Resilience in the face of disasters: Bridging micro-and macro-perspectives. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 19(8), 1010–1024.
Guo, W., & Tsui, M. (2010). From resilience to resistance: a reconstruction of the strengths perspective in social work practice. International Social Work, 53(2), 233–245.
Hemingway, L., & Priestley, M. (2014). Natural hazards, human vulnerability and disabling societies. A disaster for disabled people? Review of Disability Studies, 2, 57–67.
Hewitt-Taylor, J. (2002). Insider knowledge: Issues in insider research. Nursing Standard, 16(46), 33–35.
Howard, A., Agllias, K., Bevis. M., & Blakemore, T. (2018). How social isolation affects disaster preparedness and response in Australia: Implications for social work. Australian Social Work, 71(4), 392–404.
Islam, M., Ingham., Hicks., J., & Mancok, I. (2017). The changing role of women in resilience, recovery and economic development at the intersection of recurrent disaster: A case study from Sirjgana, Bangladesh. Journal of Asian & African Studies, 52(1), 50–67.
Jackson, R. L., Drummond, D. K., & Camara, S. (2007). What is qualitative research? Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 8(1), 21–28.
Juran, L., & Trivedi, J. (2015). Women, gender norms, and natural disasters in Bangladesh. The Geographical Review, 4, 601–611.
Maher, P., & Maidment, J. (2013). Social work disaster emergency response within a hospital setting. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work Review, 25(2), 69–77.
McManus, R. (2015). Women’s voices: Solace and social innovation in the aftermath of the 2010 Christchurch earthquakes. Women's Studies Journal, 29(2), 22–41.
Neria, Y., Galea, S., & Norris, F. H. (2009). Mental health and disasters. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Nicholls, S. (2012). The resilient community and communication practice. Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 27(1), 46–51.
Norris, F., & Wind, L. (2009). The experience of disaster: Trauma, loss adversities, and community effects. In Y. Neria, S. Galea, & F. Norris (Eds.), Mental health and disasters (pp. 29–46). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Paton, D., & Johnston, D. (2006). Disaster resilience: An integrated approach. Springfield, IL: Thomas.
Paton, D., Selway, K. L., & Mamula-Seadon, L. (2013). Community resilience in Christchurch: adaptive responses and capacities during earthquake recovery. Retrieved from https://www.gns.cri.nz/static/pubs/2013/SR%202013-037.pdf
Patton, M. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. (4th Ed). London, UK: Sage
Pease, B. (2014) Hegemonic masculinity and the gendering of men in disaster management: Implications for social work education. Advances in Social Work and Welfare Education, 16(2), 60–72.
Phibbs, S., Kenney, C., Severinsen, C., Mitchell, J., & Hughes, R. (2016). Synergising public health concepts with the Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction: A conceptual glossary. International Journal of Environmental Research & Public Health, 13, 1241–1262.
Phibbs, S., Kenney, C. M., & Solomon, M. (2015). Ngā mōwaho: An analysis of Māori responses to the Christchurch earthquakes. Kōtuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online, 10(2), 72–82.
Pittaway, E., Bartolomei, L., & Rees, S. (2007). Gendered dimensions of the 2004 tsunami and a potential social work response in post-disaster situations. International Social Work, 50(3), 307–319.
Reivich, K., & Shattẻ, A. (2002). The resilience factor. New York, NY: Broadway.
Ross, L. E. (2017). An account from the inside: Examining the emotional impact of qualitative research through the lens of “insider” research. Qualitative Psychology, 4(3), 326–337.
Rowlands, A. (2013) Social work training curriculum in disaster management. Journal of Social Work in Disability & Rehabilitation, 12(1–2), 130–144.
Saleeby, D. (2006). The strengths perspective in social work practice. Milwaukee, WI: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
Satici, S. (2016). Psychological vulnerability, resilience, and subjective well-being: The mediating role of hope. Personality & Individual Differences, 102, 68–73.
Shin, K. J., Nakakido, R., Horie, S., & Managi, S. (2016). The effects of community attachment and information seeking on displaced disaster victims’ decision making. PLoS One, 11(3), e0151928.
Statistics New Zealand. (2013). 2013 Census quickstats about a place: Selwyn district. Retrieved from http://archive.stats.govt.nz/Census/2013-census/profile-and-summary-reports/quickstats-about-a-place.aspx?request_value=14888&tabname=Populationanddwellings
Tobin, G. A., & Begley, C. M. (2004). Methodological rigour within a qualitative framework. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 48(4), 388–396.
True, J., (2013). Gendered violence in natural disaster: Learning from New Orleans, Haiti and Christchurch. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 25(2), 78–89.
van Kessel, G., Gibbs, L., & MacDougall, C. (2015). Strategies to enhance resilience post-natural disaster: A qualitative study of experiences with Australian floods and fires. Journal of Public Health, 37(2), 328–336.
Warchal, J., & Graham, L. (2011). Promoting positive adaptation in adult survivors of natural disasters. Adultspan Journal, 10(1), 34–51.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
First publication
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
Copyright
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.
