‘I thought they would just let me do my job’: Work-based practica in social work and welfare
Keywords:
social work education, work life balance, social work practicum, social work placement,Abstract
Social work and welfare education courses are underpinned by concepts such as equity, disadvantage and access as the guiding principles of practice with client groups. However, the ‘clients’ of the university, the students, are often disadvantaged in the current economic climate as they struggle to find the work/life balance with studying. In addition, many students who also currently work in the welfare field feel further disadvantaged as the knowledge and skills they bring to the course often go unrecognised. At the same time, university educators often struggle to locate sufficient numbers of stimulating learning opportunities for practica. We wondered if the time was right to explore work based practica (WBP) as a way of addressing these issues. And we wondered what common practica was across our networks with regard to WBP.
This article presents the findings of a three-stage project on the current practices, concerns, benefits and disadvantages of WBP (that is practica in a student’s place of employment) in social work and welfare education in Australia, New Zealand and Canada. Recommendations are presented so that WBP can be a more educationally sound option.
References
Bartlett, B., Heycox, K., Noble, C. and O’Sullivan J. (2004). Social Work and Welfare Practica in the Workplace: Experiences from Academia in Australia, Canada and New Zealand. International Journal of PEPE Practical Experiences in Professional Education 8(1): 71-82.
Boud, D., Cressy, P., and Docherty, P. (2006). (Eds). Productive Reflection at Work: Learning for Changing Organisations. New York: Routledge.
Fernandez, E. (1997). Effective Teaching and Learning in Practicum Education Perceptions of Student Social Workers and Student Teachers. In A. Yarrow and J. Millwater, (Eds). PEPE Practical Experiences in Professional Education, Research Monograph No.2, QUT: 67-107.
Fook, J. (2004) Critical reflection and organizational learning and change: A case study. In N. Gould and M. Baldwin (Eds) Social Work, Critical Reflection and the Learning Organization. Farnham: Ashgate, 57-74.
Gould, N. and Baldwin, M. (2004). (Eds). Social Work, Critical Reflection and the Learning Organization. Farnham: Ashgate.
Jones, M. (2004). Supervision, learning and transformative practices. In N. Gould and M. Baldwin (Eds) Social Work, Critical Reflection and the Learning Organization. Farnham: Ashgate, 11-22.
Noble, C., Heycox, K., O’Sullivan, J. and Bartlett, B. (2005). Work-based practica: Real learning or just your usual job? Advances, Journal of the Australian Association of Social Work and Welfare Education 7: 98-109.
Scheck, D., Grossman, B. and Glassman, U. (1991). (Eds). Field Education in Social Work: Contemporary Issues and Trends. Dubuque: Kendall/Hunt.
Symes, D. (2000) ‘Real world’ education: The vocalization of the university. In D. Symes and J. McIntyre (Eds). Working Knowledge - The New Vocationalism and Higher Education. Buckingham: Oxford University Press.
Thompson, N. (2006). Promoting Workplace Learning. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
First publication
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
Copyright
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.
