Social work in the Pacific: The humble and unrefined views of a non-social worker

Steven Ratuva

Abstract


I once worked in a university where sociology and social work were part of the same department, which I headed. I observed how social work, more than most “disciplines,” was readily responsive, quickly adaptive and empowering with the potential to be readapted and aligned to suit different socio-cultural contexts. From the vantage point of a non-social worker, this makes it resilient and relevant in a fast-changing world where conflict, wealth accumulation and the creation of expanding subaltern classes take place simultaneously. As peripheral “participants” in the process of corporate, technological and cultural globalisation, Pacific Island countries (PICs), often see themselves increasingly subaltern in the global economic and political power game as manifested in increasing poverty, social dislocation, debt, crime and other social problems.

A growing capacity for responsiveness, adaptation and empowerment requires a critical approach to understanding the complexities of social dynamics and impact on human wellbeing. Social work crosses the arbitrary boundaries between sociology, anthropology, psychology, development studies, conflict/peace studies, education and health and this trans-disciplinary approach makes it well positioned to address issues such as inequality, poverty, alienation and marginalisation which are common amongst subaltern groups, including those in the Pacific (Sherif & Sherif, 2017). Social work also has the potential to bridge the gap between theory and practice in what Marxian scholars refer to as “praxis” (Freenberg, 2014). Its strength is also in keeping human wellbeing as the central focus in its analysis.


Keywords


social work; interdisciplinary; Pacific; empowerment; wellbeing; community

Full Text:

PDF

References


Clements, K., Boege, V., Brown, A., Foley, W., & Nolan, A. (2007). State building reconsidered: The role of hybridity in the formation of political order. Political Science, 59(1), 45–56.

Freenberg, A. (2014). The philosophy of praxis: Marx, Lukacs and the Frankfurt school. London, UK: Verso.

Gero, A., Kohlitz, J., & Willets, J. (2017). Informal settlements in the Pacific and links to sustainable development. Development Bulletin, 78, 91–96.

Mills, C. Wright. (2000). Sociological imagination. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Ratuva, S. (2004). Reconceptualizing contemporary Pacific islands states: Towards a syncretic approach. The New Pacific Review, 2(1), 246–262.

Sherif, M., & Sherif, C. (Eds.). (2017). Interdisciplinary relationships in the social sciences. New York, NY: Routledge.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol30iss4id605

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.