Social work students’ feedback about students’ suitability for field education and the profession

Authors

  • Ines Zuchowski James Cook University, Townsville and Cairns, Australia
  • Sally Watson James Cook University, Townsville and Cairns, Australia
  • Tracey Dickinson James Cook University, Townsville and Cairns, Australia
  • Nicole Thomas James Cook University, Townsville and Cairns, Australia
  • Sandra Croaker James Cook University, Townsville and Cairns, Australia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol31iss2id633

Keywords:

Field education, suitability, students, assessment, values and ethics, social work education, social work practice

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Many students successfully complete placement, while, for a minority of students, placement may be a time when questions are asked about suitability for placement and professional practice.

METHOD: Research undertaken with final year social work students examined their ideas about suitability and unsuitability for field education and practice and presented them with a model developed with field educators in an earlier phase of the research. The aim of the study was to incorporate students’ understanding into the discourse of suitability/unsuitability to further develop a suitability/unsuitability model for collaborative discussions between students, educators and supervisors. Twenty-eight students responded to an online survey.

RESULTS: The results show that students identify a critical understanding of self, skills, knowledge, attitudes and contextual factors as important in assessing students’ suitability for field education. Identified indicators of unsuitability included lack of preparedness to learn, lack of capacity
to demonstrate an understanding of professional values and ethics and inability to maintain professional boundaries or demonstrate basic practice skills. Students overwhelmingly supported the use of the presented model and made suggestions for further development of the model.

IMPLICATIONS: The discussion emphasises the importance of using a pedagogically informed formative assessment strategy in a timely manner to address professional suitability with students.

References

AASW. (2013). Practice standards 2013 (pp. 1-19). Canberra, ACT: Australian Association of Social Workers

Agllias, K., Howard, A., Cliff, K., Dodds, J., & Field, A. (2015). Students’ experiences of university and an Australian social work program: Coming, going, staying. Australian Social Work, 69(4), 468–480. doi:10.1080/0312407x.2015.1090464

Anderson, T., & Kanuka, H. (2003). E-research: Methods, strategies and issues. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

Basnett, F., & Sheffield, D. (2010). The impact of social work student failure upon practice educators. British Journal of Social Work, 40(7), 2119–2136. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcq012

Bogo, M., Regehr, C., Hughes, J., Power, R., & Globerman, J. (2002). Evaluating a measure of student field performance in direct service. Journal of Social Work Education, 38(3), 385–401. doi:10.1080/10437797.200 2.10779106

Cleak, H., Hawkins, L., Laughton, J., & Williams, J. (2015). Creating a standardised teaching and learning framework for social work field placements. Australian Social Work, 68(1), 49–64. doi:10.1080/031240 7X.2014.932401

Cleak, H., & Wilson, J. (2019). Making the most of field placement (4th ed.). South Melbourne, VIC: Cengage Learning Australia.

Cook-Sather, A. (2006). Sound, presence, and power: “Student voice” in educational research and reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(4), 359–390.

Croaker, S., Dickinson T., Watson, S., & Zuchowski, I. (2017). Students’ suitability for social work: Developing a framework for field education. Advances in Social Work and Welfare Education, 19(2), 109–124.

Egan, S., Waugh, F., Giles, R., & Bowles, W. (2017). Authentic assessment: Partners in developing a web-based guide. Social Work Education, 36(6), 731–744.

Finch, J. (2017). “It’s just very hard to fail a student”: Decision-making and defences against anxiety–An ethnographic and practice-near study of practice assessment panels. Journal of Social Work Practice, 31(1), 51–65. doi:10.1080/02650533.2016.1158156

Furness, S., & Gilligan, P. (2004). Fit for purpose: issues from practice placements, practice teaching and the assessment of students’ practice. Social Work Education, 23(4), 465–479. doi:10.1080/0261547042000245053

Gair, S., & Baglow, L. (2017). Australian social work students balancing study, work, and field placement: Seeing it like it is. Australian Social Work, 71(1), 46–57. doi:10.1080/0312407x.2017.1377741

Giles, R., Irwin, J., Lynch, D., & Waugh, F. (2010). In the field: From learning to practice. Sydney, NSW: Oxford University Press.

Holmstrom, C. (2014). Suitability for professional practice: Assessing and developing moral character in social work education. Social Work Education, 33(4), 451–468. doi:10.1080/02615479.2013.847914

Homonoff, E. (2008). The heart of social work: Best practitioners rise to challenges in field instruction. The Clinical Supervisor, 27(2), 135–169. doi:10.1080/07325220802490828

International Federation of Social Work. (2014). Global definition of social work. Retrieved from https://www.ifsw.org/what-is-social-work/global- definition-of-social-work/

Lafrance, J., & Gray, E. (2004). Gate-keeping for professional social work practice. Social Work Education, 23(3), 325–340. doi:10.1080/0261547042000224065

Liamputtong, P. (2009). Qualitative research methods (3rd ed.). Melbourne, VIC: Oxford University Press.

McNamara, J. (2013). The challenge of assessing professional competence in work integrated learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(2), 183–197. doi:10.1080/02602938.2011.618878

Morley, C., & Dunstan, J. (2013). Critical reflection: A response to neoliberal challenges to field education? Social Work Education, 32(2), 141–156. doi:10.1080/026 15479.2012.730141

Olssen, M., & Peters, M. A. (2005). Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: From the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 313–345.

Parker, J. (2010). When things go wrong! Placement disruption and termination: Power and student perspectives. British Journal of Social Work, 40(3), 983–999. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcn149

Razack, N. (2000). Students at risk in the field. In L. Cooper & L. Briggs (Eds.), Fieldwork in the human services. Theory and practice for field educators, practice teachers and supervisors (pp. 195–204). Sydney, NSW: Allen & Unwin.

Sussman, T., Bailey, S., Richardson, K. B., & Granner, F. (2014). How field instructors judge BSW Student readiness for entry-level practice. Journal of Social Work Education, 50(1), 84–100. doi:10.1080/10437797. 2014.856233

Tam, D. M., Coleman, H., & Boey, K. W. (2012). Professional suitability for social work practice: A factor analysis. Research on Social Work Practice, 22(2), 227–239.

Downloads

Published

2019-09-09

How to Cite

Zuchowski, I., Watson, S., Dickinson, T., Thomas, N., & Croaker, S. (2019). Social work students’ feedback about students’ suitability for field education and the profession. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 31(2), 42–56. https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol31iss2id633

Issue

Vol. 31 No. 2 (2019)

Section

Original Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.

You and any co-authors

If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.

First publication

By submitting the work you are:

  1. granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
  2. confirming that the work is original; and
  3. confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.

Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.

Copyright

You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.

The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.

A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.

Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.

This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.

Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.

The copyright of others

If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:

  1. falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
  2. that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.