Continuing professional development of registered social workers in New Zealand
Keywords:social work registration, social work registration act, social work registration board, continuing professional development,
AbstractContinuing professional development (CPD) is a significant feature of contemporary practice in most professions. In New Zealand, the Social Workers Registration Board (SWRB) is empowered under legislation to set expectations for CPD. Initially NZ-registered social workers were expected to undertake 150 hours of CPD activities across a three-year period. A random audit undertaken in 2010 found that social workers were not planning their CPD activities in a purposeful way (Duke, 2012), and were struggling to meet the target and as a consequence the requirements were reduced. A content analysis of CPD logs was undertaken in order to provide a snapshot of CPD activities of 84 randomly selected registered social workers. Findings demonstrate that, while a broad range of activities were undertaken by social workers, there was only weak evidence for the enhancement of reflective practice. Engagement in scholarly activity and research was low among the randomly selected group.
Aotearoa New ZealandAssociation of Social Workers. (2011). Continuing Professional Development Policy. ANZASW: Christchurch, NZ.
Australian Association of Social Workers. (2011). Continuing Professional Development Policy 2011/2012. AASW: Canberra, ACT.
Beddoe, L. (2013a). Health social work: Professional identity and knowledge. Qualitative Social Work 12 (1): 24-40.
Beddoe, L. (2013b). Continuing education, registration and professional identity in New Zealand social work. International Social Work. Online, June 5. doi:10.1177I0020872812473139.
Beddoe, L. (2011). Investing in the future: Social workers talk about research. British Journal of Social Work 41 (3): 557-575.
Beddoe, L. (2009). Creating continuous conversation: Social workers and learning organizations. Social Work Education 28 (7): 722-736.
Beddoe, L. (1999). Continuing professional education: A new challenge for New Zealand social work. Social Work Review 11 (1): 2-7.
Beddoe, L., & Duke, J. (2009). Registration in New Zealand social work: The challenge of change. International Social Work 52 (6): 785-797.
Beddoe, L., & Henrickson, M. (2003). CPE in New Zealand: A survey of ANZASW members and some considerations for policy development. ANZASW: Auckland.
Beddoe, L., & Henrickson, M. (2005). Continuing professional social work education in Aotearoa New Zealand. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development 15 (2): 75-90.
Brown, A. (2008). Limitations of levels, learning outcomes and qualifications as drivers towards a more knowledge-based society. US-China Education Review 5 (1) (serial No 38).
Brown, K., McCloskey, C., Galpin, D., Keen, S., & Immins, T. (2008). Evaluating the impact of post-qualifying social work education. Social Work Education 27 (8): 853-867.
Butler, J. (1996). Professional development: Practice as text, reflection as process, and self as locus. Australian Journal of Education 40 (3): 265-283.
Copper, B. (2008). Continuing professional development: A critical approach. In Fraser, S. & Matthews, S. (Eds). The critical practitioner in social work and health care (pp.222-237). Sage: London.
Davis, D., & Davis, N. (2010). Selecting educational interventions for knowledge translation. CMAJ February 9, 182 (2): E89-E93.
Davis, D., Thomson, M., Oxman, A., & Haynes, R. (1995). Changing physician performance: A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. JAMA, 274 (9), 6th September: 700-705.
Dirkx, J. M., Gilley, J. W., & Gilley, A. M. (2004). Change theory in CPEand HRD: Towards a holistic view of learning and change in work. Advances in Developing Human Resources 6 (1): 35-51.
Duke, J. (2012). Registration and professional practice. Social Work Now 51: 9-16.
Gibbs, T., Bridgen, D., & Hellenberg, D. (2005). Continuing professional development. SA Family Practice 47 (3): 5-6.
Goldman, J., Zwarenstein, M., Bhattacharyya, O., & Reeves, S. (2009). Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions 29 (3): 151-156.
Gosine-Boodoo, M., & McNish, M. (2009). Pursuing CPD in the Caribbean: Individual quest versus organizational goal. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 41 (4): 203- 211.
Jeeawody, B. (2003). A transformative CPE model: Critical perspectives and challenges. In Rushbrook, P. (ed.) CPE 2003 innovations in professional practice: Influences and perspectives, (pp. 122-131). RIPPLE, Charles Sturt University: Canberra.
Konkol, J. (2008). Continuing professional development: A more comprehensive approach to life-long learning. Journal of the Pharmacy Society of Wisconsin SeptemberIOctober: 70-71.
Lymbery, M. (2011). Building a safe and confident future: One year on - reflections from the world of higher education in England. Social Work Education 30 (04): 465-471.
Madden, C. & Mitchell, V. (1993). Professionalstandards and competence: Asurvey of continuing education for professionals. Department of Continuing Education, Bristol: University of Bristol.
McMichael, A. (2000). Professional identity and continuing education: A study of social workers in hospital settings. Social Work Education 19 (2): 175-184.
Neimeyer, G., Taylor, J., & Wear, D. (2009). Continuing education in psychology: Outcomes, evaluations and mandates. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 40 (6): 617-624.
Postle, K., Edwards, C., Moon, R., Rumsey, H., & Thomas, T. (2002). Continuing professional development after qualification - partnerships, pitfalls and potential. Social Work Education 21 (2): 157-169.
Reeves, S. (2009). An overview of continuing interprofessional education. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions 29 (3): 142-146.
Rixon, A., & Ward, R. (2012). What difference does it make? Social work practice and post-qualifying awards. Practice 24 (3): 147-159.
Rogowski, S. (2010). Social work: The rise and fall of a profession? Policy Press: Bristol.
Sargeant, J. (2009). Theories to aid understanding and implementation of interprofessional education. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions 29 (3): 178-184.
Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Temple Smith: London.
Social Workers Registration Board. (2011). Competence to practise social work with different ethnic and cultural groups in Aotearoa New Zealand. Policy statement, retrieved from SWRB 03 May 2013. http://www.swrb.govt.nz/Policy.html.
Social Workers Registration Board. (2012a). Competence to practise social work with Maori. Policy statement, retrieved from SWRB 03 May 2013. http://www.swrb.govt.nz/Policy.html.
Social Workers Registration Board. (2012b). Continuing professional development for registered social workers. Wellington: SWRB. Retrieved from SWRB 03 May 2013. http://www.swrb.govt.nz/Policy.html.
Standing Committee on Postgraduate Medical and Dental Education. (1998). Continuing Professional Development for Doctors and Dentists. SCOPME: London.
US Board on Health Care Services, Committee on Planning a Continuing Health Care Professional Education Institute. (2010). Redesigning continuing education in the health professions. The NationalAcademies Press: Washington.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Williams, C. (2007). Mixed-method evaluation of continuing professional development: Applications in cultural competence training. Social Work Education 26 (2): 121-135.
How to Cite
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.