Will Marley come home? An exploration of the impacts of the Canterbury earthquakes on people’s relationships with their companion animals

Authors

  • Nikki Evans University of Canterbury
  • Maria Perez-y-Perez University of Canterbury

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol25iss2id76

Keywords:

canterbury earthquakes, christchurch earthquakes, animals, pets, disaster, loss, resiliency, human-animal relationship,

Abstract

A sizeable number of New Zealand homes contain at least one companion animal – and many of these are afforded the status of family member by their human owner(s). It follows then that when a series of high-magnitude earthquakes shook the New Zealand city of Christchurch and the Canterbury region it is located within, many people and their companion animals were impacted. Generic and disaster-specific research into animal-human relationships has mostly been undertaken outside of the profession of social work. However, a number of recent social work research and theoretical papers draw attention to the need for this discipline to also embrace this field (Evans & Gray, 2012; Morley & Fook, 2005; Tedeschi, Fitchett, & Molidor, 2005; Risley-Curtiss, Holley, & Wolf, 2006b; Risley-Curtiss, 2010). The aftermath of the Canterbury earthquakes has revealed a need to look critically at how animal-human relationships are perceived, and the potential for these relationships to be considered within routine social work assessments and interventions. This paper considers the role of companion animals in people’s lives, addresses the status of these animals during the Canterbury earthquakes, explores issues of loss and resiliency within animal-human relationships and looks at the implications of these relationships for social work practice and research.

References

Akhtar, D. A. (2012). Animals and public health: Why treating animals better is critical to human welfare. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Barker, S. B., & Wolen, A. R. (2008). The benefits of human-companion animal interaction: A review. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 35, 487-495.

Barton Ross, C., & Baron-Sorensen, J. (2007). Petloss and human emotion: A guide to recovery. New York: Routledge.

Beck, A. M., & Katcher, A. H. (2003). Future directions in human-animal bond research. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 79-93.

Blazina, C., Boyraz, G., & Shen-Miller, D. (Eds.). (2011). Using context to inform clinical practice and research. The psychology of the human-animal bond: A resource for clinicians and researchers (pp.2-24). New York: Springer.

Boat, B. W., & Knight, J. C. (2000). Experiences and needs of adult protective services case managers when assisting clients who have companion animals. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 12, 145-155.

Evans, N. (2011). The dynamics of animal-human relationships during and following a natural disaster. Te Awatea Review, 9(1&2), 22-25.

Evans, N., & Gray, C. (2012). The practice and ethics of animal-assisted therapy with children and young people: Is it enough that we don’t eat our co-workers? British Journal of Social Work, 42, 600-617.

Faver, C. A., & Cavazos, A. M. (2008). Love, safety, and companionship: The human-animal bond and Latino families. Journal of Family Social Work, 11, 254-271.

Gates, C. (2011, June 23). Dogs bring post-quake cheer. The Press. Retrieved from http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/news/christchurch-earthquake-2011/5180385/Dogs-bring-post-quake-cheer.

Glassey, S. (2010). Recommendations to enhance companion animal emergency management in New Zealand. Wellington: Mercalli Disaster Management Consulting.

Glassey, S., & Wilson, T. (2011). Animal welfare impact following the 4 September 2010 Canterbury (Darfield) earthquake. Australasian Journal of Disaster and Trauma Studies, 2, 49-59.

Hart, L. (Ed.). (2000). Psychological benefits of animal companionship. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Heinsch, M. (2012). Getting down to earth: Finding a place for nature in social work practice. International Journal of Social Welfare, 21, 309-318.

Irvine, L. (2009). Filling the ark: Animal welfare in disasters. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

Kerridge, B. (2011). SPCA hails its Christchurch heroes. Press release retrieved from http://rnzspca.org.nz/about/news/press-releases/377-spca-hails-its-christchurch-heroes.

Kurdek, L. A. (2009). Pet dogs as attachment figures for adult owners. Journal of Family Psychology, 23, 439-446.

MacKay, J. (2011). Companion animals in New Zealand. New Zealand Companion Animal Council Inc.

Melson, G. F., & Fine, A. H. (2006). Animals in the lives of children. In A. H. Fine (Ed.), Handbook on animal-assisted therapy: Theoretical foundations and guidelines for practice (2nd ed., pp. 207-226). San Diego, CA. Academic Press.

Morley, C., & Fook, J. (2005). The importance of pet loss and some implications for services. Mortality, 10(2), 127-143.

Myers, B. (2002). Disenfranchised grief and the loss of an animal companion. In K. J. Doka (Ed.), Disenfranchised grief: New directions, challenges, and strategies for practice (pp.251-264). Champaign, IL: Research Press.

Risley-Curtiss, C. (2010). Social work practitioners and the human-animal bond: A national study. Social Work, 55(1), 38-46.

Risley-Curtiss, C., Holley, L. C., Cruickshank, T., Porcelli, J., Rhoads, C., Bacchus, D. N. A., Nyakoe, S., & Murphy, S. B. (2006a). She was family: Women of color and animal-human connections. Affilia, 21(4), 433-447.

Risley-Curtiss, C., Holley, L. C., & Wolf, S. (2006b). The animal-human bond and ethnic diversity. Social Work, 51(3), 257-268.

Tedeschi, P., Fitchett, J., & Molidor, C. E. (2005). The incorporation of animal-assisted interventions in social work education. Journal of Family Social Work, 9(4), 59-77.

Walsh, F. (2009). Human-animal bonds II: The role of pets in family systems and family therapy. Family Process, 48, 481-499.

Wells, D. L. (2009). The effects of animals on human health and well-being. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 523-543.

White, S. (2012). Companion animals, natural disasters and the law: An Australian perspective. Animals, 2, 380-394.

Wolf, D. B. (2000). Social work and speciesism. Social Work, 45, 88-93.

Wood, L. J., Giles-Corti, B., Bulsara, M. K., & Bosch, D. A. (2007). More than a furry companion: The ripple effect of companion animals on neighborhood interactions and sense of community. Society and Animals, 15(1), 43-56.

Wood, L. (2012). The pet connection. Paper presented at the 23rd NZ Companion Animal Conference, 10th October 2012. Wellington, New Zealand.

Zastrow, C. (2008). Introduction to social work and social welfare: Empowering people (9th ed). Belmont: Thompson Brooks/Cole.

Downloads

Published

2016-05-15

How to Cite

Evans, N., & Perez-y-Perez, M. (2016). Will Marley come home? An exploration of the impacts of the Canterbury earthquakes on people’s relationships with their companion animals. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 25(2), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol25iss2id76

Issue

Vol. 25 No. 2 (2013)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.

You and any co-authors

If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.

First publication

By submitting the work you are:

  1. granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
  2. confirming that the work is original; and
  3. confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.

Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.

Copyright

You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.

The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.

A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.

Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.

This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.

Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.

The copyright of others

If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:

  1. falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
  2. that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.