Whakamana Tangata: An evaluation of a restorative Te Ao Māori-based approach in youth justice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol37iss2id1219Keywords:
restorative-relational practice, te ao Māori values, youth offending, secure residential care, Aotearoa New ZealandAbstract
INTRODUCTION: This article considers the implementation and evaluation of Whakamana Tangata, a restorative, te ao Māori-based practice approach within a youth justice residence. Developed as part of broader youth justice reforms and grounded in te ao Māori values and restorative–relational practices, the approach seeks to promote respectful and constructive engagement within secure residential care.
METHODS: Using a mixed-methods approach, the evaluation explored the implementation and embedding of Whakamana Tangata in Te Maioha o Parekarangi in Rotorua. Data analysis included 31 semi-structured interviews with residential kaimahi, leadership, Design Group members and rangatahi, alongside focus groups, surveys and documentary analysis.
FINDINGS: Findings indicate that restorative practices, combined with te ao Māori values, contributed to improved engagement, more meaningful responses to harmful situations, and a shift towards relational rather than punitive responses within the youth justice system. However, challenges remained, particularly regarding consistent embedding and the broader alignment of restorative principles and te ao Māori values within institutional frameworks.
CONCLUSION: By analysing this practice approach, the article highlights the significance of strengthening te ao Māori-informed approaches within youth justice and their meaningful alignment with restorative practices. The study underscores the potential of this approach to positively impact youth justice environments, advocating for frameworks that prioritise connection, respect, and accountability over punitive responses.
Downloads
References
Blank-Penetito, A., Tauri, J., & Webb, R. (2022). Rangatahi Māori and youth justice in New Zealand. In M. Walter, T. Kukutai, A. A. Gonzales, & R. Henry (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of indigenous sociology (pp. 155–170). Oxford University Press.
Buckley, S., & Maxwell, G. (2007). Respectful schools. Restorative practices in education. A summary report. Office of the Children’s Commissioner and The Institute of Policy Studies, School of Government, Victoria University.
Cleland, A., & Quince, K. (2014). Youth justice in Aotearoa New Zealand: law, policy and critique. LexisNexis NZ.
Cohen, A. (2011). Little criminals. Random House.
Dalley, B. (1998). Family matters child welfare in twentieth-century New Zealand. Auckland University Press.
Francis, D., & Vlaanderen, P. (2023). Oranga Tamariki secure residences and a sample of community homes. Independent, External Rapid Review.
Gibbs, A. (2022). Best practice for justice: Practitioner views on understanding and helping youth living with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD). Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work. 34(4), 6–18.
Lambie, I., Krynen, A., & Best, C. (2016). Youth justice secure residences: A report on the international evidence to guide best practice and service delivery. Ministry of Social Development.
Lambie, I., & Randell, I. (2013). The impact of incarceration on juvenile offenders. Clinical Psychology Review, 33, 448– 459.
Littlechild, B. (2009). Restorative justice, mediation and relational conflict resolution in work with young people in residential care. Practice: Social Work in Action, 21(4), 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/09503150903191704
McCarney, W. (2010). A restorative justice approach to working with children in residential care. Law and Justice Review, 1(1), 247–288.
McCold, P., & Wachtel, T. (2001). Restorative justice in everyday life. In J. Braithwaite & H. Strang (Eds.), Restorative justice and civil society (pp. 114–129). Cambridge University Press.
Ministry of Social Development (2016). Expert panel final report. Investing in New Zealand’s children and families. Wellington. Retrieved from https://www.msd.govt.nz/documents/about-msd-and-our-work/publications-resources/corporate/expert-panel-cyf/investing-in-children-report.pdf (last accessed 22 November 2023).
Moorfield, J. C. (2011). Te Aka Māori dictionary. Pearson.
Moyle, P., & Tauri, J. M. (2016). Māori, Family Group Conferencing and the mystifications of restorative justice. Victims & Offenders, 11(1), 87–106.
Office of the Children’s Commissioner. (2017). State of care: A focus on Oranga Tamariki’s secure residences. Wellington.
Office of the Prime Minister’s Chief Science Advisor. (2018). It’s never too early, never too late: A discussion paper on
preventing youth offending in New Zealand. Auckland.
Oranga Tamariki. (2020a). Whāinga Whetū: Whakamana Tangata. Kete Tuatahi (Kete One). Wellington.
Oranga Tamariki. (2020b). Whakawhiti Moana: Whakamana Tangata. Kete Tuarua (Kete Two). Wellington.
Oranga Tamariki, Social Impact and Research. (2024). Youth justice custody: Updated trends and outlook. Wellington.
Parker, W. (2006). Social Welfare Residential Care 1950–1994. Prepared for the Historic Claims Team Ministry of Social Development.
Tauri, J. M., & Webb, R. (2012). A critical appraisal of responses to Māori offending. The International Indigenous Policy Journal, 3(4), Art. 5.
Watt, E. (2003). A history of youth justice in New Zealand. A research paper commissioned by the Principal Youth Court Judge. Funded by a research grant by Department of Courts.
Wearmouth, J., McKinney, R., & Glynn, T. (2007). Restorative justice: Two examples from New Zealand schools. British Journal of Special Education, 34(4), 196–203.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
First publication
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
Copyright
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.
