Supporting choice, preventing harm: Social workers’ knowledge gaps and ethical challenges with assisted dying in Aotearoa New Zealand
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol37iss2id1233Keywords:
assisted dying, medically assisted dying, social work ethics, MAiDAbstract
INTRODUCTION: This study is the first of its kind to explore social workers’ perspectives on assisted dying following the legislation of the End of Life Choice Act 2019 in Aotearoa New Zealand. The topic is ethically complex and legally regulated, making social workers’ perspectives particularly valuable since they may increasingly engage with people facing end-of-life decisions in settings like hospitals, hospices, aged care facilities, and palliative care programmes.
METHOD: Data were collected through an anonymous online qualitative survey from September to December 2023, capturing a diverse range of views from 120 social workers in Aotearoa New Zealand.
FINDINGS: Three themes were constructed from the data using Proudfoot’s (2023) hybrid thematic coding strategy: 1) “some semblance of choice”: navigating client autonomy, 2) “be careful”: managing ethics, coercion and risk, and 3) “just my own research”: limited knowledge and training. Participants noted the tension between upholding clients’ rights to choose while being mindful of personal and external pressures that may influence decisions, especially among vulnerable groups. Participants also expressed a need for more precise guidelines and more training to handle the ethical dilemmas posed by assisted dying in a manner that is thoughtful, competent, and appropriate.
IMPLICATIONS: These findings suggest that social workers play a crucial role in mediating between client autonomy and protection. By understanding the ethical challenges and systemic barriers in assisted dying, social workers can better advocate for transparent policies and improved training, equipping them to provide better support to clients in their end-of-life decisions.
Downloads
References
Althubaiti, A. (2016). Information bias in health research: Definition, pitfalls, and adjustment methods. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 9, 211–217. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S104807
Antifaeff, K. (2019). Social work practice with medical assistance in dying: A case study. Health & Social Work, 44(3), 185-192. https://doi.org/10.1093/hsw/hlz002
Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW). (2021). Position statement: End of Life Choice Act 2019. https://www.anzasw.nz/public/150/files/Resources/EoLCA-Position-Statement-v1.pdf
Beddoe, L., & Stanfield, D. (2022). Is it time to reconsider professional development and continuing education for social workers twenty years after registration in Aotearoa New Zealand? Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 34(4), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol34iss4id1024
Beresford, P., Croft, S., & Adshead, L. (2008). ‘We don’t see her as a social worker’: A service user case study of the importance of the social worker’s relationship and humanity. The British Journal of Social Work, 38(7), 1388–1407. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcm043
Blaschke, S.-M., Schofield, P., Taylor, K., & Ugalde, A. (2019). A common dedication to facilitating good dying experiences: Qualitative study of end-of-life care professionals’ attitudes towards voluntary assisted dying. Palliative Medicine, 33(6), 562–569. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216318824276
Braun, V., Clarke, V., Boulton, E., Davey, L., & McEvoy, C. (2021). The online survey as a qualitative research tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 24(6), 641–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1805550
Bravo, G., Delli Colli, N., Dumont, I., Bouthillier, M.-E., Rochette, M., & Trottier, L. (2023). Social workers’ experiences with medical assistance in dying: Survey findings from Quebec, Canada. Social Work in Health Care, 62(5), 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/00981389.2023.2210624
Butler, J. (2020). The force of non-violence. Verso.
Casey, J., & Macleod, S. (2021). The assessment of competency and coercion in the End of Life Choice Act 2019. The New Zealand Medical Journal (Online), 134(1547), 114–120. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35728115/
Chowns, G., & Richardson, H. (2016). Social work practice in end of life care. Journal of Social Work Practice, 30(2), 115–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2016.1168387
Close, E., Willmott, L., & White, B. P. (2021). Regulating voluntary assisted dying practice: A policy analysis from Victoria, Australia. Health Policy, 125(11), 1455–1474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.09.003
Cootes, H., Heinsch, M., & Brosnan, C. (2022). “Jack of all trades and master of none”? Exploring social work’s epistemic contribution to team-based health care. The British Journal of Social Work, 52(1), 256–273. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcaa229
Csikai, E. L. (1999). The role of values and experience in determining social workers’ attitudes toward euthanasia and assisted suicide. Social Work in Health Care, 30(1), 75–95. https://doi.org/10.1300/j010v30n01_05
Digby, R., McDougall, R., Gold, M., Ko, D., O’Driscoll, L., & Bucknall, T. (2022). Introducing voluntary assisted dying: Staff perspectives in an acute hospital. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 11(6). https://doi.org/10.34172%2Fijhpm.2020.216
Downie, J., & Schuklenk, U. (2021). Social determinants of health and slippery slopes in assisted dying debates: Lessons from Canada. Journal of Medical Ethics, 47(10), 662–669. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2021-107493
Feigin, S., Owens, R. G., & Goodyear-Smith, F. (2019). Helping a loved one die: The act of assisted dying in New Zealand. Mortality, 24(1), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576275.2017.1382461
Foster, S., & Beddoe, L. (2012). Social work with older adults in primary health-is it time to move our focus?. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 24(2), 37-48.
Frey, R., & Balmer, D. (2021). The views of Aotearoa/New Zealand adults over 60 years regarding the End of Life Choice Act 2019. Journal of Religion and Health, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-021-01359-7
Fuscaldo, G., Gwini, S. M., Larsen, R., & Venkataramani, A. (2021). Do health service staff support the implementation of voluntary assisted dying at their workplace?. Internal Medicine Journal, 51(10), 1636-1644. https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.15285
Giles, R. (2016). Social workers’ perceptions of multi-disciplinary teamwork: A case study of health social workers at a major regional hospital in New Zealand. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 28(1), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol28iss1id113
Head, B., Peters, B., Middleton, A., Friedman, C., & Guman, N. (2019). Results of a nationwide hospice and palliative care social work job analysis. Journal of Social Work in End-Of-Life & Palliative Care, 15(1), 16–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/15524256.2019.1577326
Hendry, M., Pasterfield, D., Lewis, R., Carter, B., Hodgson, D., & Wilkinson, C. (2013). Why do we want the right to die? A systematic review of the international literature on the views of patients, carers and the public on assisted dying. Palliative Medicine, 27(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216312463623
Hospice Rotorua. (2020, August 4). Euthanasia & the End of Life Choice Act: Rotorua community hospice’s organisational position on the End Of Life Choice Act. https://rotoruahospice.co.nz/2020/08/04/the-end-of-life-choice-act/
Hospice Whanganui. (n.d.). End of Life Choice Act: Our position on euthanasia and assisted dying. https://hospicewhanganui.org.nz/about-us/end-of-life-choice-act/
Larson, R. B. (2019). Controlling social desirability bias. International Journal of Market Research, 61(5), 534–547. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470785318805305
Lee, P. (2020). Mōku anō ēnei rā: The End of Life Choice Act and its compliance with Te Tiriti o Waitangi. Te Tai Haruru: Journal of Māori and Indigenous Issues 7, 144–162. https://www.nzlii.org/nz/journals/TaiHaruruJl/2020/9.html
Lilley, D., & Reid, K. (2023). Utilising literature and systems theory to explore the intersections between policy, practice and equity of access to palliative care for older adults in Aotearoa New Zealand. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 35(1), 48–59. https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol35iss1id1006
Malpas, P. J., Anderson, A., Jacobs, P., Jacobs, T., Luinstra, D., Paul, D., Rauwhero, J., Wade, J., & Wharemate, D. (2017). “It’s not all just about the dying”. Kaumātua Māori attitudes towards physician aid-in dying: A narrative enquiry. Palliative Medicine, 31(6), 544–552. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216316669921
Manson, L. M. (2021). Te Ao Māori: Māori nurses’ perspectives on Assisted Dying and the Te Ao Māori cultural considerations required to guide nursing practice (Doctoral dissertation, Auckland University of Technology). https://openrepository.aut.ac.nz/server/api/core/bitstreams/4df14498-b4be-4617-8287-e04fd2418a10/content
Mathison, E. (2020). Saying it don’t make it so: A response to Winnington and MacLeod. The New Zealand Medical Journal (Online), 133(1520), 104-7.
Ministry of Health. (2021, November). Assisted dying service: The assisted dying process. https://www.tewhatuora.govt.nz/assets/For-the-health-sector/Assisted-Dying/Public-information/The-assisted-dying-process-information-sheet-PDF239-KB.pdf
New Zealand Government (2019). End of Life Choice Act 2019. https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2019/0067/latest/whole.html
Norton, E. M., & Miller, P. J. (2012). What their terms of living and dying might be: Hospice social workers discuss Oregon’s Death with Dignity Act. Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care, 8(3), 249–264.
Palliative Care Australia. (2025). FAQs. https://palliativecare.org.au/faqs/
Pockett, R., & Beddoe, L. (2015). Social work in health care: An international perspective. International Social Work, 60(1), 126–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872814562479
Pockett, R., Walker, E., & Dave, K. (2010). “Last orders”: Dying in a hospital setting. Australian Social Work, 63(3), 250–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2010.497928
Proudfoot, K. (2023). Inductive/deductive hybrid thematic analysis in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 17(3), 308–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898221126816
Pullman, D. (2023). Slowing the slide down the slippery slope of medical assistance in dying: Mutual learnings for Canada and the US. The American Journal of Bioethics, 23(11), 64–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2023.2201190
Social Workers Registration Board. (2023). Annual social worker workforce report 2023: A high-level overview of the social worker workforce in 2023. https://swrb.govt.nz/workforcesurveys/
Te Whatu Ora. (2024, June 4). Contact the assisted dying service. https://www.tewhatuora.govt.nz/health-services-and-programmes/assisted-dying-service/contact-the-assisted-dying-service
Vungkhanching, M., & Tonsing, K. N. (2016). Social workers’ perceived role clarity as members of an interdisciplinary team in brain injury settings. Journal of Social Work in Disability & Rehabilitation, 15(3–4), 370–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/1536710X.2016.1220887
Wang, C. W., Chan, C. L. W., & Chow, A. Y. M. (2017). Social workers’ involvement in advance care planning: A systematic narrative review. BMC Palliative Care, 17(1), 5–5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-017-0218-8
Winnington, R., Holroyd, E., & Zambas, S. (2018). The socio-political debate of dying today in the United Kingdom and New Zealand: ‘Letting go’ of the biomedical model of care in order to develop a contemporary Ars Moriendi. Societies, 8(3), 65.
Winnington, R., & MacLeod, R. (2020). The social consequences of assisted dying: A case study. University of Auckland, Public Policy Institute. https://www.ppi.auckland.ac.nz
Young, J., Dehkhoda, A., Ahuriri-Driscoll, A., Cheung, G., Diesfeld, K., Egan, R., Karaka-Clarke, T. H., Moeke-Maxwell, T., Reid, K., Robinson, J., Snelling, J., White, B., & Winters, J. (2024). Exploring the early experiences of assisted dying in Aotearoa New Zealand: A qualitative study protocol. BMJ Open, 14(10). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090118
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
First publication
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
Copyright
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.