Crafting the society of control: Exploring Scottish child welfare policy in a neoliberal context
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol28iss3id242Keywords:
GIRFEC, named persons, neoliberalism, children and families, late modernityAbstract
INTRODUCTION: This article explores contemporary Scottish child welfare policy and locates it in a neoliberal context. The existing national practice model known by the acronym GIRFEC (Getting it Right for Every Child) has been a feature of policy and legislation since early 2000. Its latest iteration is notable for two developments, one being the change in the threshold for state intervention in family life to the notion of wellbeing and secondly, the appointment of a state guardian (known as the named person scheme) for every child in Scotland.
METHOD: Drawing from the concept of late modernity (Parton, 2006) I argue that these advances constitute a net widening approach that seeks to universalise state involvement in family life. The concept of the society of control (Deleuze, 1992) is utilised as a method of exploring how the named person scheme can be viewed as a universal surveillance mechanism which seeks to preserve and promote neoliberal hegemony.
CONCLUSION: In the Scottish context the named person scheme is a vehicle for neoliberal state control. The scheme is underpinned by notions of normative compliance resulting in social work practice becoming distanced from its social change agenda, instead working on families rather than with families.
References
Beddoe, L. (2014). Feral families, troubled families: The spectre of the underclass in New Zealand. New Zealand Sociology, 29(3), 51-68.
Brodie I., Nottingham C., & Plunkett, S. (2008). A tale of two reports: Social work in Scotland from Social Work and the Community (1966) to Changing Lives (2006). British Journal of Social Work, 38(4), 697-715. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcn035.
Children and Young Persons Scotland; Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Scotland by Command of Her Majesty April, 1964, Edinburgh HMSO (Kilbrandon). Retrieved from http://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2014/8/pdfs_20140008-en.pdf.
Children (Scotland) Act 1995 Retrieved from http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1995/36/contents.
Clark, C., & Smith, M. (2012). Changing Lives: What is really changing for Scottish social work? European Journal of Social Work, 15(3), 313-330. doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2010.543892.
Crossley, S. (2015). Realising the (troubled) family: Crafting the neo liberal state. Journal of Families, Relationships and Societies, 5(2), 263-279. doi: 10.1332/204674315x14326465757666.
Deleuze, G. (1992). Postscript on the societies of control. October, (Winter 1992), 3-7.
Dennet, D. (1988). Conditions of personhood. In M. Goodman (Ed.) What is a person (1st ed., pp145-169) Clifton, NJ: Humana Press.
Donzelot, J., Deleuze, G., & Robert (1980). The policing of families. London, England: Hutchinson.
Esposito, R. (2012). Third person: Politics of life and philosophy of the impersonal. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Evans, B., & Giroux, H. (2015). Disposable futures: The Seduction of violence in the age of spectacle. San Francisco, CA: City Lights Books.
Featherstone, B., Morris, K., & White, S. (2013). A marriage made in hell: Early intervention meets child protection. British Journal of Social Work, 44(7), 1735 -1749. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bct052
Ferguson, I., & Woodward, R. (2009). Radical social work in practice: Making a difference. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.
Foucault, M. (2001). Governmentality. In D. Faubion, James (Ed.), Power: The essential works of Michel Foucault 1954–1984. (1st ed., pp.201–223). New York NY: The New Press.
Gilbert, J. (2013). What kind of thing is neoliberalism? New Formations 80-81(1), 7-22doi.org/10.3898/nEWF.80/81.IntroductIon.2013.
Garrett, P. M. (2005). Social work’s “electronic turn”: Notes on the deployment of information and communication technologies in social work with children and families. Critical Social Policy, 25(4), 529-553. doi: 10.1177/0261018305057044.
Harvey, D. (2007). A brief history of neoliberalism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
McAra, L., & McVie, S. (2007). Youth justice? The impact of system contact on patterns of desistance from offending. European Journal of Criminology, 4(3), 315-345. doi: 10.1177/1477370807077186.
McGhee, J., & Waterhouse, L. (2010). Locked out of prevention? The identity of child and family-oriented social work in Scottish Post-Devolution policy. British Journal of Social Work, 41(6), 1088-1104. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcq121.
Parton, Nigel. (2005). Safeguarding childhood: Early intervention and surveillance in a late modern society. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ruch, G. (2005). Relationship-based practice and reflective practice: Holistic approaches to contemporary child care social work. Child & Family Social Work, 10(2), 111-123. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2206.2005.00359.x.
Scottish Government (2016a). Using the My World Triangle (and where appropriate specialist assessments) to gather further information about the needs of the child or young person. Retrieved from http://www.gov.scot/Topics/People/Young-People/gettingitright/national-practice-model/my-world-triangle.
Scottish Government (2016b). What is a Named Person? Retrieved from http://www.gov.scot/Topics/People/Young-People/gettingitright/named-person.
Scottish Government. (2016c).What is GIRFEC? Retrieved from http://www.gov.scot/Topics/People/Young-People/gettingitright/what-is-girfec.
Smith, M., & Whyte, B. (2008). Social education and social pedagogy: Reclaiming a Scottish tradition in social work. European Journal of Social Work, 11(1), 15-28 doi: 10.1080/13691450701357174.
Standing, G. (2011). The precariat: The new dangerous class. New York, London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Stoddart, E. (2015). The named person: Surveillance and the wellbeing of children and young people in Scotland. Journal of Surveillance and Society, 13(1), 102-115.
Trevithick, P. (2003). Effective relationship-based practice: A theoretical exploration. Journal of Social Work Practice, 17(2), 163-176. doi: 10.1080/026505302000145699.
Wacquant, L. (2009). Punishing the poor: The neoliberal government of social insecurity. Durham,NJ: Duke University Press.
Webb, S. (2009). Risk, governmentality and insurance: The actuarial recasting of social work. In H. Otto., A. Polutta, & H. Zeigher (Eds.) Evidence-based practice- Modernising the knowledge base of social work? (pp. 211-226).Farmington Hills MI: Barbara Budrich Publishers.
Waiton, S. (2016). Third way parenting and the creation of the “named person” in Scotland: The end of family privacy and autonomy? SAGE Open, Retrieved from http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/6/1/2158244016629525.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
First publication
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
Copyright
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.
