Shifting power relations in New Zealand child welfare policy: The process and implications of the 2014 amendment to s13 of the CYP&tF Act

Authors

  • Sarah Martin Victoria University of Wellington

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol28iss2id223

Keywords:

Vulnerable Children's Act 2014, Children Young Persons and their Families Act, paramountcy of the child, rational-comprehensive policy development, power

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Vulnerable Children (VC) Act 2014 amended section 13 (s13) of the Children, Young Persons and their Families (CYP&tF) Act 1989 to re-emphasise the principle that the welfare and interests of the child should be the paramount consideration in child protection proceedings. This study examines the policy process behind the amendment, and investigates its possible implications, in particular its impact on the power relationship between the state and family/whanau.

METHOD: Data was collected from semi-structured, confidential interviews with 10 key informants. Key themes were identified using thematic analysis. This was supplemented by document analysis of published and unpublished government papers, consultation papers and local and international research.

FINDINGS: The policy process that preceded the decision to amend s13 of the CYP&tF Act was controlled by a small policy elite that failed to consult broadly on either the need for the amendment, or its impact on vulnerable children and families. Government gave little consideration to the implications of the policy change, and the policy process used to develop the amendment lacked the characteristics of rational, comprehensive, policy development. No evaluation or monitoring of the policy change has been put in place, despite the known risk that it may result in an increase in unnecessary removals of children from their families/whanau.

CONCLUSION: The s13 amendment, while appearing minor, has significant implications for vulnerable children and families and is part of a fundamental re-balancing of power relations in New Zealand’s child welfare policy.

References

Barrington, J. (2004). A Voice for Children: The Office of the Commissioner for Children in New Zealand 1984-2003. Wellington: Dunmore Press. Retrieved from http://www.occ.org.nz/assets/Uploads/OCCAVoiceforChildren-010104.pdf

Baumgartner, F.R., & Jones, B.D. (1991). Agenda dynamics and policy subsystems. The Journal of Politics, 53(4),

-1074.

Bennett, P. (2012). White Paper on Vulnerable Children. Paper to Cabinet Social Policy Committee, September 2012. Wellington, Ministry of Social Development. Retrieved from http://www.msd.govt.nz/documents/

about-msd-and-our-work/work-programmes/policydevelopment/white-paper-vulnerable-children/whitepaper-

cabinet-paper.pdf

Bennett, P. (2013). Bold legislation will protect children. Retrieved from http://beehive.govt.nz/release/boldlegislation-will-protect-children

Bennett, P. (2014a). Vulnerable Children Bill Passed into Law. Retrieved from https://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/vulnerable-children-bill-passed-law

Bennett, P. (2014b). Vulnerable Children Bill Passed Into Law. Retrieved from https://www.national.org.nz/news/news/media-releases/detail/2014/06/19/vulnerablechildren-bill-passed-into-law

Connolly, M. (1994). An act of empowerment: The Children, Young People and their Families Act, British Journal of Social Work, 24, 87-100.

Cooke, A. (2013). State responsibility for children in care (Doctoral thesis, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand). Retrieved from https://ourarchive.otago.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10523/ 4796/CookeAllanJ2014PhD.pdf?sequence=1

Dalley, B. (1998). Family matters: Child welfare in twentiethcentury New Zealand. Auckland: Auckland University Press.

Featherstone, B., White, S., & Morris, K. (2014). Reimagining child protection: Towards humane social work with families. Bristol: Policy Press.

Galvin, P. (2014). Letter to the author in response to a request under the Official Information Act.

Gregory, R. (2004). Political life and intervention logic: Relearning old lessons? International Public Management Review, 5(2), 1-12.

Hill, M. (2013). The public policy process (6th ed). Essex: Pearson.

Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2003). Studying public policy: policy cycles and policy subsystems, (2nd ed). Ontario:

Oxford University Press.

Hyslop, I. (2009). Child protection policy and practice: A relationship lost in translation. Social Policy Journal of

New Zealand, 34, 62-72.

Keddell, E. (2014). The White Paper on Vulnerable Children and welfare reform in Aotearoa New Zealand: Two sides of the same coin? Paper presented at the Social Work Social Development conference, Melbourne, Australia.

Key, J. (2011). Statement to Parliament 2011. Retrieved from http://www.beehive.govt.nz/feature/statementparliament-2011.

Kline, M. (1992). Child welfare law, “best interests of the child” ideology, and first nations. Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 30(2), 375-425.

Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, alternatives and public policies. Boston: Little Brown.

Lonne, B., Parton, N., Thomson, J., & Harris, M. (2009). Reforming child protection. New York: Routledge.

Ministerial Advisory Committee on a Maori Perspective for the Department of Social Welfare (1988). Puao-Te- Ata-Tu. Retrieved from https://www.msd.govt.nz/documents/about-msd-and-our-work/publications-resources/

archive/1988-puaoteatatu.pdf

Ministry of Social Development. (2011). Every child thrives, belongs, achieves: green paper for vulnerable children. Retrieved from http://www.msd.govt.nz/documents/about-msd-and-our-work/work-programmes/policydevelopment/green-paper-vulnerable-children/greenpaper-for-vulnerable-children.pdf.

Ministry of Social Development. (2012a). The White Paper for Vulnerable Children, Volume II. Retrieved from

http://www.msd.govt.nz/documents/about-msd-and-ourwork/work-programmes/policy-development/white-papervulnerable-children/whitepaper-volume-ii-web.pdf

Ministry of Social Development. (2012b). The green paper for vulnerable children: Complete summary of submissions. Retrieved from https://www.msd.govt.nz/ documents/about-msd-and-our-work/work-programmes/ policydevelopment/green-paper-vulnerable-children/thegreen-paper-for-vulnerable-children-submissions.pdf

Ministry of Social Development. (2012c). Amending the objects and principles of the Children, Young Persons

and Their Families Act 1989. Memo to unidentified recipients, released to the author under the Official Information Act.

MSD. (2013). Regulatory Impact Statement. Vulnerable Children’s Bill: Specific care and protection legislation

changes. Retrieved from https://www.msd.govt.nz/documents/about-msd-and-our-work/publicationsresources/

regulatory-impact-statements/vulnerablechildrens-bill-specific-care-and-protection-legislationchanges.pdf

Nutley, S., Walter, I. & Davies, H. (2009). Past, present and possible futures for evidence-based policy. In G. Argyrous (Ed.), Evidence for policy and decisionmaking: A practical guide (pp. 1-23). Sydney: UNSW.

Roberts, M. (2015). Letter to the author in response to a request under the Official Information Act.

Scott, S., & Baehler, B. (2010). Adding value to policy analysis and advice. Sydney: UNSW.

Shaw, R., & Eichbaum, C. (2011). Public policy in New Zealand: Institutions, processes and outcomes, (3rd ed).

Auckland: Pearson.

Smith, M. (2011). Report to Hon Paula Bennett, Minister for Social Development and Employment following an inquiry into the serious abuse of a nine year old girl and other matters relating to the welfare, safety and protection of children in New Zealand. Retrieved from http://www.beehive.govt.nz/sites/all/files/Smith_report.pdf

Wills, R. (2011). The green paper on vulnerable children: Position of the Children’s Commissioner. Retrieved from

http://www.occ.org.nz/assets/Uploads/submissions/The- Green-Paper-on-Vulnerable-Children-Position-ofthe-

Childrens-Commissioner.pdf

Downloads

Published

2016-08-18

How to Cite

Martin, S. (2016). Shifting power relations in New Zealand child welfare policy: The process and implications of the 2014 amendment to s13 of the CYP&tF Act. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 28(2), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol28iss2id223

Issue

Section

Original Articles