Reflections on the new Scottish innovative child protection system

Authors

  • Robyn Agnew

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol27iss3id7

Keywords:

child protection, Scotland

Abstract

This paper reflects on my work in Scotland in child protection during 2009 and 2010. It reflects on the Scotland I discovered and The Highlands I worked in. It describes recent innovative political decisions that have informed social work practice across all professions and government departments. It describes the implementation of an essentially simple system, which provides support for every child in need, specific to that need. 

It is a system that could positively inform the further development of child protection in New Zealand. Given the current plan to seek ways to ‘modernise’ Child Youth and Family (CYF), this paper seeks to encourage a debate on the merits of this path-finding Scottish solution to their political, social, ethnic and professional barriers, which could also produce positive outcomes for children in New Zealand (Tolley, 2015). 

It describes the overlaying of this approach on top of a professional workforce, despite the silo bureaucracy of service delivery and regardless of professional jealousies protecting individual professions. It describes the responsibilities of all who interact with children and sets certain overlying responsibilities for ‘named’ persons. In this way the responsibilities for the protection of children is moved from the realm of the social work profession, which is overloaded, as it is currently in New Zealand, and applied directly to all professions that interact with children. 

The Scots have produced a reliable system which strengthens protective mechanisms at the point of service delivery to the child. This in turn develops a reliable and accountable protective society, in which children in need are identified early and supported throughout their contact with different services. The goal is an on-going intervention that can achieve change for the child and allow the child to reach their potential. It is an aspirational system of care, aiming for development of innate potential. 

I reflect on the system and the safety it provided to myself as a social worker, the relief of ‘sharing’ child protection responsibilities with all other professions and the clarity of roles which defines this system.

Author Biography

Robyn Agnew

In 1985 I graduated from Auckland College of Education with a CQSW. I worked for ADHB Children’s Mental Health Marinoto with a clinical caseload of children and families, becoming a senior social worker. I then worked with much the same client base at Child Youth and Family Services Specialist Services, as a therapist, becoming manager of the service. During this period I sat on the Advisory Group for the new Child Psychotherapy Degree at Auckland University of Technology. 

In 1999 I began to develop an interest, with other CYF senior staff, in providing systematic support for work-related harm. I went on to write the policy for Critical Incident Stress Management, in- corporating psychological work injury into CYF’s Health and Safety Policy. I oversaw the national implementation of these policies based in CYF’s Human Resources Group 2000 to 2006; organising and co-training up to 60 staff debriefers and up to 200 Peer Supporters; thus provisioning a national service to CYF staff; providing same-day support and considered follow-up; linking staff to psycho- logical support services for on-going work when required. 

In 2006 I left New Zealand for the UK and eventually spent some time in Scotland working as a child protection social worker 2009-10. I now work for the ADHB Starship as a paediatric social worker for Medical Specialties; for the Renal, Gastroenterology and Respiratory Teams; providing transplant and social work assessment and support for families with chronic illness. 

I love my work and love the breadth and possibility inherent in the profession. 

References

Adams, A. (2015). Strengthening New Zealand’s legislative response to family violence; A public discussion document. Retrieved from https://consultations.justice.govt.nz/policy/family-violence-law/user_uploads/fv-consul- tation-discussion-document-v2.pdf

Child Poverty Action Group Inc. (2013). Child abuse: What role does poverty play? Retrieved from www.cpag.org.nz/ resources-publications, June 2013.

GIRFEC. http://www.gov.scot/Topics/People/Young-People/gettingitright/publications

Office of Commissioner for Children. (2015 ). State of care report. Retrieved from www. occ.org.nz/. St John, J. (2015). Reflections on Budget 2015. Policy Quarterly, II(3).

Stuff (2015). Kumar killers’ sentencing. Retrieved from http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/70706222/Auckland-dairy- owners-killer-jailed-for-six-years

Tolley, A. (2015). Modernising Child Youth and Family Expert Panel. Retrieved from https://www.msd.govt.nz/ about-msd-and-our-work/newsroom/media-releases/2015/cyf-panel.html

United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. (1989). Retrieved from www.ohchr.org/en/profession- alinterest/pages/crc.aspx.

UNCRC. (2013). The foundation of GIRFEC. Retrieved from http://www.gov.scot/Topics/People/Young-People/get- tingitright/publications/uncrc-girfec-report.

Downloads

Published

2015-09-01

How to Cite

Agnew, R. (2015). Reflections on the new Scottish innovative child protection system. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 27(3), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol27iss3id7

Issue

Vol. 27 No. 3 (2015)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.

You and any co-authors

If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.

First publication

By submitting the work you are:

  1. granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
  2. confirming that the work is original; and
  3. confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.

Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.

Copyright

You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.

The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.

A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.

Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.

This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.

Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.

The copyright of others

If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:

  1. falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
  2. that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.