Caucusing: Creating a space to confront our fears
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol21iss1id321Keywords:
te tiriti o waitangi, treaty of waitangi, colonialism, new zealand history, social work education, caucusing, m?ori and non-m?ori studentslAbstract
Learning does not occur in a vacuum and this reality challenges all educators to provide for the differing learning needs that exist because of students’ particular relationship to the course material. Teaching Te Tiriti o Waitangi and the colonial history of Aotearoa New Zealand to adult students of social work and counselling in mainstream tertiary education programmes provides particular challenges and opportunities for tutors and students alike. When teaching this topic, it is essential that the nature of the relationships that exist today between the peoples that represent the signatories of the Tiriti / Treaty of Waitangi in 1840 is explored. Yet, at the same time, the learning needs of all students must be met.
The authors have extensive experience in the teaching of Te Tiriti o Waitangi to adult learners. They have found the practice of caucusing helpful in creating a process that affords an opportunity for a transfer of learning to take place. How this process operates is the subject of this research study. In it, the authors identify distinct differences between Maaori and non-Maaori students’ experiences of caucusing. Worthwhile explanations of these differences are provided and linked to literature findings. Excerpts from research relating to the hidden dynamics of white power and domination are provided and assist in increasing an understanding of the intense reactions expressed by students during the transfer of knowledge process. Comments from students are included to highlight the shifts in understanding as the caucusing experience proceeds. The authors suggest that this topic has quite different implications for students within the same classroom, dependent upon whether they are located within the group that has experienced colonisation and domination (Maaori) or the other group, i.e. the colonising group (non-Maaori). They highlight the need to go beyond an intellectual fact-gathering exercise to achieve significant and worthwhile educational outcomes in this topic area.
References
Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers. (2008). Code of ethics, 2nd revision. Christchurch, New Zealand.
Baldwin, J. (1962). The fire next time. New York: The Dial Press.
Bell, H.S. (2006) Exiting the matrix: Colonisation, decolonisation and social work in Aotearoa. (Unpublished Masters thesis). Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Cheyne, C., O’Brien, M., & Belgrave, M. (2005). Social policy in Aotearoa New Zealand: A critical introduction, 3rd ed. Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: Oxford.
Consedine, R., & Consedine, J. (2005). Healing our history: The challenge of the Treaty of Waitangi. New Zealand: Penguin Books.
Hickling-Hudson, A. (2006). Cultural complexity, post colonialism and educational change: Challenges for comparative educators. International Review of Education, 52(1/2), 201-218.
Howard, G. (2006). We can’t teach what we don’t know: White teachers: Multiracial schools, 2nd ed. New York: Teachers’ College Press.
Jones, A. (1999). The limits of cross-cultural dialogue: Pedagogy, desire and absolution in the classroom. Educational Theory, 49(3), 299-316.
Manglitz, E. (2003). Challenging white privilege in adult education: A critical review of the literature. Adult Education Quarterly, 53(2), 119-134.
McFadyen, A. (1997). Rapprochement in sight? Post modern family therapy and psychoanalysis. Journal of Family Therapy, 19(3), 241-262.
New Zealand Association of Counselling. (2002). Code of ethics. Hamilton, New Zealand.
Ministerial Advisory Committee on a Maori Perspective for the Department of Social Welfare. (1986). Puao-te-ata-tu (Daybreak). Wellington: Department of Social Welfare.
Rich, M.D., & Cargile, A.C. (2004). Beyond the breach: Transforming white identities in the classroom. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 7(4), 351-365.
Ritchie, J. (2003). Bicultural development within an early childhood teacher education programme. International Programme of Early Years Education, 11(1), 43-56.
Rossiter, A. (2001). Innocence lost and suspicion found: Do we educate for or against social work? Critical Social Work, 2(1). (E-journal.)
Sampson, E.E. (1993). Celebrating the other: A dialogic account of human nature. Boulder, Colorado, USA: Westview Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
First publication
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
Copyright
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.
