Revisiting the 2019 Oranga Tamariki inquiries: What did we learn, and what might that mean for the future of child protection in Aotearoa?
Keywords:
Child Protection, Oranga Tamariki, Tamariki, Whānau, Hawkes Bay CaseAbstract
Introduction: Widespread protests against Oranga Tamariki in 2019 led to six separate reviews in the following two years, the majority of which specifically focused on tamariki and whānau Māori. Now that the dust has settled on those reviews, what can be learned by revisiting them?
Approach: This article analyses the key themes of each of the reviews. It finds that there are areas of concern common to all six, but that there is a major split within them on how to achieve the necessary long-term changes. Some of the reviews suggest that improvements can be made within the current system, while others suggest that only radical transformation will improve outcomes for tamariki and whānau Māori.
Conclusions: Understanding the split between the reviews is important given the views of numerous child-protection researchers that more structural changes to the child-protection system are required if we are to address underlying problems. If the issues are more fundamental, then claims to reform may not only be inadequate, but they may also make the problem worse, by sustaining the systems which cause the underlying harms in the first place. The split in the approach of the reports reveals that it is not just “What do children and whānau need?” that matters, it is also “who gets to decide what children and whānau need?” Understanding these issues from a structural perspective remains crucial, and future reviews of the child-protection system which fail to address those underlying problems are unlikely to lead to effective long-term change.
References
Aroturuki Tamariki: Independent Children's Monitor. (2023). Experiences of care in Aotearoa: Agency compliance with the National Care Standards and Related Matters Regulations. New Zealand Government.
Boshier, P. (2020). He Take Kōhukihuki | A matter of urgency. The Office of the Ombudsman.
Davis, A. Y. (2003). Are prisons obselete? Seven Stories Press.
Davis, K. (2021). Direction for Oranga Tamariki August 2021. Office of the Minister for Children. https://www. orangatamariki.govt.nz/assets/Uploads/About-us/ Information-releases/Cabinet-papers/OT-Ministerial-Advisory-Board/Direction-for-Oranga-Tamariki-August-2021.pdf
Dettlaff, A., & Boyd, R. (2020) Racial disprortionality and disparities in the child welfare system: Why do they exist, and what can be done to address them? Annals of the American Academy of Political Science, 692(1), 253–274.
Durie, M. (1998). Te mana, te kāwanatanga: The politics of Māori self-determination. Oxford University Press.
Durie, M. (2001). Mauri ora: The dynamics of Māori health. Oxford University Press.
Elkington, B., Jackson, M., Kiddle, R., Mercier, O. R., Ross, M., Smeaton, J., & Thomas, A. (2020). Imagining decolonisation. Bridget Williams Books.
Expert Panel. (2015). Expert Panel Final Report: Investing in New Zealand’s children and their families. Ministry of Social Development.
Fitzmaurice-Brown, L. (2022). Te Rito o Te Harakeke: Decolonising child protection law in Aotearoa New Zealand. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 53(4), 507–542.
Gilbert, N., Parton, N., & Skivenes, M. (2011). Child protection systems: International trends and orientations. Oxford University Press.
Hyslop, I. (2022). A political history of child protection: Lessons for reform from Aotearoa New Zealand. Bristol University Press.
Keddell, E. (2017). Comparing risk-averse and risk-friendly practitioners in child welfare decision-making: A mixed methods study. Journal of Social Work Practice, 33(4), 411–429.
Keddell, E. (2022). Mechanisms of inequality: The impact of instrumental biases in the child protection system. Societies, 12(83), 1–19.
Keddell, E., Davie, G., & Barson, D. (2019). Child protection inequalities in Aotearoa New Zealand: Social gradient and the “inverse intervention law”. Children and Youth Services Review (104), 1–8.
Keddell, E., Fitzmaurice, L., Cleaver, K., & Exeter, D. (2022). A fight for legitimacy: Reflections on child protection reform, the reduction of baby removals, and child protection decision-making in Aotearoa New Zealand. Kotuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online, 17(3), 378-404. https://doi.org/10.1080/117708 3X.2021.2012490
Kemp, S.P., Te Urukaiata Mackay, H., Egan-Bitran, M., King, P.T., Smith, A., Valente, S., West, C., Urlich, T., Quor, Z., Prapaiporn Thonrithi, P., Phillips, K., Phillips, C., Heron, I., Bekele, S., & Baldwin, S. (2022). Kia Tika, Kia Pono – Honouring truths: Ensuring the participatory rights of tamariki and rangatahi who are care experienced. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/03036758.2023.2219409
Krakouer, J. (2023, July 7). Towards systemic transformation: Shifting thinking on First Nations self-determination in child protection. Webinar presentation at UniSA Justice & Society.
Martin, T. (2019, June 18). Oranga Tamariki Review. https:// www.beehive.govt.nz/release/oranga-tamariki-review
Ministry for Children – Oranga Tamariki. (2019). Professional Practice Group Review into the Hawkes Bay Case. https://www.orangatamariki.govt.nz/about-us/news/ hawkes-bay-practice-review/
Ministry of Social Development. (2012). White Paper for Vulnerable Children. https://orangatamariki.govt.nz/ assets/Uploads/Support-for-families/childrens-teams/ white-paper-for-vulnerable-children-volume-1.pdf
Office of the Children’s Commissioner. (2020a). Te Kuku O Te Manawa – Ka puta te riri, ka momori te ngā kau, ka heke ngā roimata mo tōku pēpi. https://www.manamokopuna. org.nz/publications/reports/te-kuku-o-te-manawa/
Office of the Children’s Commissioner. (2020b). Te Kuku O Te Manawa – Moe ararā ! Haumanutia ngā moemoeā a ngā tūpuna mō te oranga o ngā tamariki. https:// www.manamokopuna.org.nz/publications/reports/tktm- report-2/
Oranga Tamariki Ministerial Advisory Board. (2021). Hipokingia ki te kahu aroha, hipokingia ki te katoa: The initial report of the Oranga Tamariki Ministerial Advisory Board. https://www.beehive.govt.nz/sites/default/ files/2021-09/SWRB082-OT-Report-FA-ENG-WEB.PDF
Pere, R. (1988). Te Wheke. In S. Middleton (Ed.), Women and education in Aotearoa (pp.6 –19). Allen & Unwin.
Pugh, M., Bowden, N., Kokaua, J., Dawson, P., & Duncanson, M. (2023). Health outcomes of children in state care in Aotearoa New Zealand. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 1–20.
Roberts, D. E. (2021). How I became a family policing abolitionist. Colombia Journal of Race and Law (11), 455–469.
Waitangi Tribunal. (2021). He Pa ̄ harakeke, he Rito Whakakikinga Whā ruarua: Oranga Tamariki Urgent Inquiry (WAI 2915). Waitangi Tribunal.
Walker, R. (2004). Ka whawhai tonu matou: Struggle without end. Penguin Publishers.
Whānau Ora Commissioning Agency. (2020). Ko te wā whakawhiti: It’s time for change – a Māori inquiry into Oranga Tamariki. https://whanauora.nz/publications/ko- te-wa-whakawhiti
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
First publication
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
Copyright
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.
