A Pākehā journey towards bicultural practice through guilt, shame, identity and hope
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol28iss4id300Keywords:
bicultural practice, biculturalism, P?keh?, identityAbstract
INTRODUCTION: For many social workers, aspects of their training and the development of competence are a growth journey that begins even before they may be aware of it starting, continues during training and throughout social workers’ professional lives. One area that is of particular interest is bicultural practice, often an area that holds challenges for Pākehā practitioners for many reasons. The journey of understanding and growth towards being a social worker who practices biculturally is a long one that often, for Pākehā, starts in guilt and shame.
CONCLUSIONS: This article is a reflection of a Pākehā social worker, who shares her own personal journey through guilt and shame towards hope; hope that we can engage and journey in our bicultural practice to become a more compassionate, effective practitioner. As part of this reflection, the social worker shares her discovery of loss of identity as Pākehā and encourages other Pākehā to connect with who has gone before them in an attempt to understand self and understand others.
References
Addy, N. (2008). White privilege and cultural racism. New Zealand Journal of Counselling, 28(1), 10–23.
Bell, A. (1999). Styling the other to define the self: A study in New Zealand identity making. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 3(4), 523–541.
Bell, A. (2009). Dilemmas of settler belonging: Roots, routes and redemption in New Zealand national identity claims. The Sociological Review, 57(1), 145–162.
Bennett, B. (2015). ‘Stop deploying your white privilege on me! ’Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander engagement with the Australian Association of Social Workers. Australian Social Work, 68(1), 19–31.
Bidois, V. (2013). A genealogy of cultural politics, identity, resistance. Alternative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 9(2), 142–154.
Callister, P. (2015). The New Zealand ‘melting pot’: An opinion piece. Auckland, New Zealand: Callister & Associates.
Celemajer, D., & Kidman, J. (2012). Embedding the apology in the nations identity. Journal of Polynesian Society, 12(3), 219–242.
Consedine, R., & Consedine, J. (2012). Healing our history: The challenge of the Treaty of Waitangi. Auckland, New Zealand: Penguin Random House.
Delano-Oriaron, O. O., & Parks, M. W. (2015). One black, one white: Power, white privilege, & creating safe spaces. Multicultural Education, 22(3–4), 15–19.
Dominy, M. D. (2002). Hearing grass, thinking grass: Post colonialism and ecology in Aotearoa New Zealand. Cultural Geographies, 9, 15–34.
Goldson, J., & Fletcher, T. R. (2004). Training for bicultural intervention with families. New Zealand Journal of Counselling, 25(2), 33–43.
Gulati-Partee, G., & Potapchuk, M. (2014). Paying attention to white culture and privilege: A missing link to advancing racial equity. Foundation Review, 6(1), 25–38. doi:10.9707/1944-5660.1189
Hilliard, C. (2010). Licensed native interpreter: The land purchaser as ethnographer in early-20th-century New Zealand. The Journal of Pacific History, 45(2), 229–245.
Kirkwood, S., Liu, J. H., & Weatherall, A. (2005). Challenging the standard story of indigenous rights in Aotearoa New Zealand. Journal of Community& Applied Social Psychology, 15(6), 493–505.
Lang, S. K., & Gardiner, B. D. (2014). As they like it – culture-centred counsellor education in the context of Aotearoa New Zealand: A play on bicultural pluralism. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 42(1), 73–85.
Lang, S. K. W., & Katene, K. (2007). Tikanga and ethics: A dialogical encounter of two cultures. New Zealand Journal of Counselling, 27(1), 33–42.
Lyons, A. C., Madden, H., Chamberlain, K., & Carr, S. (2010). ‘Its not really us discriminating against immigrants, its more telling people how to fit in’: Constructing the nation in immigration talk in New Zealand. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 21,(1) 14–27.
Margaret, J. (2009). Reflections on the past – learning in social movements. Experience in the Pākehā Treaty Workers’ movement. Retrieved from http://www.trc.org.nz/understanding-learning-social-movements-study-learning-p%C4%81keh%C4%81-treaty-workers%E2%80%99-movement
Mataira, P. (1995). Bicultural wisdom: Navigating the bicultural seas. Social Work Review, VII(1), 9–10.
Mulqueeney, N. (2012). ‘Tumeke bro?’ A personal reflection of a male white counselor working with male Māori tamariki. New Zealand Journal of Counselling, 31(1), 56–67.
Nairn, M. (2009). National issues: Pākehā languaging around Te Tiriti. Retrieved from http://www.trc.org.nz/sites/trc.org.nz/files/P%C4%81keh%C4%81%20languaging.pdf
Rangihau, J. (2008). Māori culture today. Te Komako, 4, 3–12.
Rata, A., Liu, J. H., & Hanke, K. (2008). Te arahohourongo (The path to peace): Māori conceptualisations of inter-group forgiveness. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 37(2), 18–30.
Reed, K. (2016). Frances Rutherford Lecture 2015. Possibilities for the future: Doing well together as agents of change. New Zealand Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63(1), 4–13.
Ruwhiu, P. T., Ruwhiu, L. A., & Ruwhiu, L. L. H. (2008). Te tatoukupenga: Mana tangata supervision. A journey of emancipation through heart mahi for healers. Te Komako, 4, 13–34.
Sibley, C. G., & Liu, J. H. (2004). Attitudes towards biculturalism in NZ: Social dominance & Pākehā attitudes towards the general principles and resources-specific aspects of bicultural policy. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 33(2), 88–99.
Walker, S. (2012). The teaching of Māori social work practice and theory to a predominantly Pākehā audience. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 24(3&4), 65–72.
Webber, M. (2006). Explorations of identity for people of mixed Māori/Pākehā descent: Hybridity in New Zealand. International Journal of the Diversity, 6(2), 7–13.
Webber, M., McKinley, E., & Hattie, J. (2013). The importance of race and ethnicity: An exploration of New Zealand Pākehā, Māori, Samoan and Chinese adolescent identity. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 42(2), 17–28.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
First publication
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
Copyright
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.
