The Power of One: Why auto-ethnography, solo service-user voice and reflective case study analysis are useful strategies for researching family-centred social work practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol25iss4id61Keywords:
family-centred social work, social work practice, research strategies, auto-ethnography, solo service-user voice, reflective case study analysis,Abstract
Family-centred social work practitioners often reflect upon and talk about their everyday work with families, but they rarely write about it, other than in case notes or for formal reports. If social work practitioners were to adopt a range of easy-to-use research strategies that focus on either one service-user, or one family case, or one practitioner experience, then they may be empowered to write and publish more about their work. This may then lead to a series of practitioner pieces aimed at improving knowledge and methods in family-centred social work practice. This article explores three ‘One Voice strategies’: those of auto-ethnography, solo service-user voice and reflective case study analysis, and their usefulness to researching family-centred social work practice. It argues that using such strategies are valid in everyday social work and that practitioners can make a difference to our knowledge of effectiveness in practice by telling us about just one story – the power of one!References
Anderson-Nathe, B., Gringeri, C., & Wahab, S. (2013). Nurturing ‘critical hope’ in teaching feminist social work research. Journal of Social Work Education 49(2): 277-291.
Atkinson, P. (2013). Blowing hot: The ethnography of craft and the craft of ethnography. Qualitative Inquiry 19(5): 397-404.
BBC (2012). Protecting our children. Accessed 24th April 2013, from http://www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/proginfo/2012/05/protecting-our-children.html.
Beresford, P., & Carr, S. (2012). Social care, service users and user involvement. London: Jessica Kingsley.
Beresford, P., Adshead, L., & Croft, S. (2007). Palliative care, social work and service users: Making life possible. Jessica Kingsley: London.
Chatham-Carpenter, A. (2010). ‘Do thyself no harm’: Protecting ourselves as autoethnographers, Journal of Research Practice 6(1): Art. M1, accessed 23rd September 2013, from http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/ view/213/183.
Cooper, B. (2001). Constructivism in social work: Towards a participative practice viability. British Journal of Social Work 31(5): 721-738.
Craig, R.W. (2007). A day in the life of a hospital social worker – Presenting our role through the personal narrative. Qualitative Social Work 6(4): 431-446.
Cree, V., & Davis, A. (2006). Social work; Voices from the inside. Abingdon: Routledge. Court,
D., & Abbas, R. (2013). Whose interview is it, anyway? Methodological and ethical challenges of insider-outsider research, multiple languages, and dual-researcher cooperation. Qualitative Inquiry 19(6): 480-488.
Davis, C. (2006). Sylvia’s story - Narrative, storytelling, and power in a children’s community mental health system of care. Qualitative Inquiry 12(6):1220-1243.
Denzin, N. (2006). Analytic autoethnography, or déjà vu all over again. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 35(4): 419-428.
Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (Eds.) (1998). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Donmoyer, R. (2012). Two (very) different worlds: The cultures of policymaking and qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry 18(9): 798-807.
Dumbleton, S. (2013). Goodies and baddies: Equivocal thoughts about families using an autoethnographic approach to explore some tensions between service providers and families of people with learning disabilities. 7(3): 282-292.
Ellis, C. (2013).Crossing the rabbit hole: Autoethnographic life review. Qualitative Inquiry 19(1): 35-45.
Ellis, C., Adams, T., & Bochner, A. (2011). Autoethnography: An overview. Qualitative Social Research 12(1): art.10, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1101108.
Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. (2006). Analysing analytic autoethnography: An autopsy. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 35(4): 429-449.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case study research. Qualitative Inquiry 12(2): 219-249.
Gibbs, A. (2011). Having to adopt children twice is not in the children’s best interests: A reflective case study analysis of inter-country adoption policy in the UK. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 33(3): 267-277.
Gibbs, A. (2012). What do social work students think social work research is? Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work 24(2): 19-26.
Gibbs, A. (2013a). What would a scholarship of publication look like? Higher Education Research and Development 32(4): 687-689.
Gibbs, A. (2013b). The needs of adopted and fostered children. In N. Higgins & C. Freeman (Eds.), Childhoods: Growing up in Aotearoa/New Zealand. Dunedin: Otago University Press.
Hammond, S., & Cooper, N. (2010). From looked after children to looking after children: Insight from an unusual perspective. International Social Work 54(2): 238-245.
Jensen-Hart, S., & Williams, D. (2010). Blending voices: Autoethnography as a vehicle for critical reflection in social work. 30(4): 450-467.
IFSW (2012). Definition of social work. Accessed 24th April, 2013, from http://ifsw.org/policies/definition-of-social-work/.
Lewis, P. (2011). Research as storytelling. Qualitative Inquiry 17(6): 505-510.
Mason, L. (2013). The journey of one pregnant incarcerated woman through systemic bias: How family support workers can positively affect change – A case study. Affilia 28(1): 32-39.
McKenzie, M. (2008). You should write that up: Getting practitioners started on writing for publication. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work 20(2):86-91.
McLaughlin, H. (2012). Understanding Social Work Research. London: SAGE.
Morse, J. (2002). Writing my own experience. Qualitative Health Research 12(9): 1159-1160.
Munford, R. & Sanders, J.(2003). (Eds.) Making a difference in families: Research that creates change. St Leonards: Allen and Unwin.
Orme, J., & Powell, J. (2007). Building research capacity in social work: Process and issues. British Journal of Social Work 38(5): 988-1008.
Osmond, J., & O’Connor, I. (2006). Use of theory and research in social work practice: Implications for knowledge-based practice. Australian Social Work 59(1): 5–19.
Solem, M.B. (2011). Meaning making and avoidance in parenting. Qualitative Social Work 12(2): 170-185.
Smith, R. (2009). Doing social work research. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Speedy, J. (2013). Where the wild dreams are. Qualitative Inquiry 19(1): 27-34.
Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Swain, A. (2013). Waiting for daybreak: A survivor’s account of theft and recovery. Qualitative Inquiry 19(7): 502-504.
Swenson, C. (2012). Dare to say ‘I’; The personal voice in professional writing. Families in Society 93(3): 233-239.
Teachman, G., & Gibson, B. (2012). Children and youth with disabilities: Innovative methods for single qualitative interviews. Qualitative Health Research 20(10): 1-11.
Tolich, M. (2010). A critique of current practice: Ten foundational guidelines for autoethnographers. Qualitative Health Research 20(12): 1599-1610.
Wall, S. (2008). Easier said than done: Writing and autoethnography, International Journal of Qualitative Methods 7(1): 38-53.
Wall. S. (2012). Ethics and the socio-political context of international adoption: Speaking from the eye of the storm. Ethics and Social Welfare 6(4): 318-332.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
First publication
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
Copyright
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.
