Student selection process effectiveness: Correlations between task performance and undergraduate success
Keywords:education, selection, admission, M?ori, Pacific Island
INTRODUCTION: This article is a case study of student selection process effectiveness in an undergraduate social work degree at Unitec in Auckland, Aotearoa New Zealand. Addressing an internationally under-researched topic, it examines whether admitted candidates’ performance on selection day tasks correlate with their success in the programme.
METHODS: Applicant selection data were analysed for 2012 and 2013 cohorts (N = 196). Student success is measured in relation to outcomes across eight courses, considering both course completions and grades received. Correlational analyses were performed to address the research aim. The project also examined whether existing demographic data correlate with success, as these data represent potentially confounding variables.
FINDINGS: Performance on selection activities conducted as part of application to this degree does not correlate with course completions, and correlates only moderately with higher grades received for courses. Findings also show that students who are wage-earning or self-employed on admission, studying full time, and/or admitted well before their studies begin are more likely to succeed. No other demographic factors are correlated with student success.
CONCLUSIONS: This study supports existing literature documenting the ineffectiveness of selection criteria for social work programmes, and also addresses a gap in scholarship by examining the value of specific selection tools and measures. Factors that do correlate with student success suggest that being well-resourced as a student is paramount. Supporting students to succeed during the course of their study may be of higher value than attempting to select “suitable” students in the first place.
Adam, J., Dowell, J., & Greatrix, R. (1999). Use of UKCAT scores in student selection by UK medical schools, 2006-2010. BMC Medical Education, 11, 98–104.
Apaitia-Vague, T., Pitt, L., & Younger, D. (2011). “Fit and proper” and fieldwork: A dilemma for social work educators? Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work Review, 23(4), 55–64.
Beddoe, L. (2007). Change, complexity and challenge in social work education in Aotearoa New Zealand. Australian Social Work, 60(1), 46–55.
Beddoe, L. (2014). A matter of degrees: The role of education in the professionalisation journey of social work in New Zealand. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work Review, 26(2/3), 17–28.
Cornelissen, J. J., & van Wyk, A. S. (2007). Professional socialisation: An influence on professional development and role definition. South African Journal of Higher Education, 21(7), 826–841.
Curtis, E., Wikaire, E., Stokes, K., & Reid, P. (2012). Addressing indigenous health workforce inequities: A literature review exploring “best” practice for recruitment into tertiary health programmes. Journal for Equity in Health, 11(13). Retrieved from http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/11/1/13
Dillon, J. (2007). The conundrum of balancing widening participation with the selection of suitable students for social work education. Social Work Education, 26(8), 827–841.
Greenwood, J., & Te Aika, L. (2009). Hei Tauira: Teaching and learning success for Māori in tertiary settings. Summary document, Wellington, NZ: Ako Aotearoa—The National Centre for Tertiary Teaching Excellence.
Horrocks, J., Ballantyne, N., Silao, A., Manueli, K., & Fairbrother, P. (2012). Success for Pacific learners: The impact of tertiary education strategies. Retrieved from https://akoaotearoa.ac.nz/download/ng/file/group-5331/success-for-pacific-learners-the-impact-of-tertiary-education-strategies.pdf
Hughes, C., McNabb, D., Ashley, P., McKechnie, R., & Gremillion, H. (2016). Selection of social work students: A literature review of selection criteria and process effectiveness. Advances in Social Work and Welfare Education, 18(2), 94–106.
Lenhard, W., & Lenhard, A. (2016). Calculation of effect sizes. Retrieved from https://www.psychometrica.de/effect_size.html Bibergau (Germany): Psychometrica. doi:10.13140/RG.2.1.3478.4245
Madjar, I., McKinley, E., Jensen, S., & Van Der Merwe, A. (2009). Towards university: Navigating NCEA course choices in low-mid decile schools. Auckland, NZ: Starpath Project, The University of Auckland.
McNabb, D. (2014). 30 years’ membership and a 50th birthday – where to next for ANZASW? Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work Review, 26(2&3), 61–71.
Ministry of Education. (2009). Motivation and achievement at secondary school: The relationship between NCEA design and student motivation and achievement: A three-year follow-up. Retrieved from https://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/49358/NCEA_Summary_Report_Final_150709.pdf
Ministry of Education. (2013). Ka Hikitia: Accelerating success / Māori education strategy 2013-2017. Wellington, NZ: Author.
Ministry of Education. (2017). Participation rates in tertiary education. Retrieved from http://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/statistics/indicators/main/student-engagement-participation/1963Ministry of Social Development. (2013).
Studylink News: A resource for education providers and student associations. Retrieved from https://www.providers.studylink.govt.nz/documents/studylink-news-2013-06.pdf
Ministry of Social Development. (2017). Regulatory impact statement: Legislative changes to increase the professionalism of the social work workforce. Retrieved from http://www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/informationreleases/ris/pdfs/ris-msd-lgt-jul17.pdf
Ministry of Education, and the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (2014). Tertiary education strategy 2014–2019. Retrieved from https://education.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Further-education/Tertiary-Education-Strategy.pdf
Nash, M. (2003). Social work education: Agencies and academic disciplines. International Social Work, 46(1), 23–35.
Office of the Minister for Social Development. (2017). Increasing the professionalism of the social work workforce. Cabinet Social Policy Committee proposal May 2017. Retrieved from https://www.msd.govt.nz/documents/about-msd-and-our-work/publications-resources/regulatory-impact-statements/2017.05.12-swra-cabinet-paper-for-cabinet.pdf
Pelech, W., Stalker, C., Regehr, C., & Jacobs, M. (1999). Making the grade: The quest for validity in admissions decisions. Journal of Social Work Education, 35(2), 215–226.
Poole, P., Shulruf, B., Harley, B., Monigatti, J., Barrow, M., Reid, P., . . . Bagg, W. (2012). Shedding light on the decision to retain an interview for medical student selection. New Zealand Medical Journal, 125(1361), 81–88.
Ross, E. (2010). Selection tests and social justice: A profile of applicants seeking admission to the social work undergraduate degree at a South African University. Social Work Education, 29(5), 459–474. doi:10.1080/0215470903177630
Ryan, M., Cleak, H., & McCormack, J. (2006). Student performance in field education placements: The findings of a 6-year Australian study of Admissions Data. Journal of Social Work Education 42(1), 66–84.
Social Workers Registration Board (SWRB). (2013). The process for recognition/re-recognition of social work qualifications in New Zealand. Wellington, NZ: Author.
Social Workers Registration Board. (2015). Fit and proper person: Policy statement. Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/Catherine/Downloads/Fit-and-Proper-Policy%20(1).pdf
Social Workers Registration Board. (2015–16) Annual report. Retrieved from http://www.swrb.govt.nz/news-and-publications/publications
Social Services Committee. (2016). Inquiry into the operation of the Social Workers Registration Act 2003. Presented to the House of Representatives, December 2016. Retrieved From https://www.parliament.nz/resource/en-NZ/51DBSCH_SCR71955_1/170b828c8c569c2b9b33e5dc08749ee79df34450
Social Practice PER. (2015). Programme evaluation and review for Unitec: Semester 1 and 2, 2014. Auckland, NZ: Author.
Sowbel, L. (2012). Gatekeeping: Why shouldn’t we be ambivalent? Journal of social Work Education, 48(1), 27–44.
Watson, D. (2002). Just a paper exercise? Social Work Education, 21(1), 79–89.
How to Cite
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.