"You cannot take it with you": Reflections on intersectionality and social work
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol31iss1id560Keywords:
Intersectionality, mana w?hine, feminism, decolonisation, oppressionAbstract
This article presents a brief commentary on intersectionality and social work with a particular focus on Aotearoa, New Zealand. It begins with an examination of the genealogy of intersectionality through an acknowledgement that the concept has a longer lineage than the name. This foray into genealogy underscores the point that meticulous citational practice is a key component of good intersectional practice. Definitional challenges are briefly addressed, and the idea that theory and praxis are intimately connected is explored. Following this intersectionality is discussed in the context of ‘mana wāhine’ and recent developments in intersectionality in Aotearoa New Zealand. Finally, there is a discussion of why intersectionality is needed in social work with examples drawn from reflective practice and child protection in Aotearoa New Zealand.
References
Auckland Pride Board, (2018, November). Auckland Pride Board confirms position on police uniforms in parade. Retrieved from: https://aucklandpride.org.nz/media-centre/auckland-pride-board-confirms-position-on-police-uniforms-in-parade/
Cho, S., Crenshaw, K. W., & McCall, L. (2013). Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theory, applications, and praxis. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 38(4), 785-810.
Clark, J. (2018, July 23). Equality, presupposes that we should all be equal, but in fact, none of us really ever are. Manukau Courier. Retrieved from: https://www.stuff.co.nz/auckland/local-news/manukau-courier/105673174/jackie-clark-equality-presupposes-that-we-should-all-be-equal-but-in-fact-none-of-us-really-ever-are
Collins, P. H. (2013). On intellectual activism. Philadelphia, United States: Temple University Press.
Collins, P. H. (2015). Intersectionality's definitional dilemmas. Annual Review of Sociology, 41(1), 1-20.
Collins, P. H., & Bilge, S. (2016). Intersectionality. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Polity Press.
Collins, P. H., & Chepp, V. (2013). Intersectionality. In G. Waylen, K. Celis, J. Kantola & S. L. Weldon (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of gender and politics (pp. 1-34). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139-167.
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575-599.
Keddell, E. & Hyslop, I. (2019). Ethnic inequalities in child welfare: The role of practitioner risk perceptions. Child & Family Social Work, https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12620
Mattsson, T. (2014). Intersectionality as a useful tool: Anti-oppressive social work and critical reflection. Affilia, 29(1), 8-17.
May, V. M. (2015). Pursuing intersectionality, unsettling dominant imaginaries. New York, United States: Routledge.
McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(3), 1771-1800.
Mehrotra, G. (2010). Toward a continuum of intersectionality theorizing for feminist social work scholarship. Affilia, 25(4), 417-430.
Moradi, B., & Grzanka, P. R. (2017). Using intersectionality responsibly: Toward critical epistemology, structural analysis, and social justice activism. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 64(5), 500-513.
Moyle, P., & Tauri, J. M. (2016). Māori, family group conferencing and the mystifications of restorative justice. Victims & Offenders, 11(1), 87-106.
Murphy, L. (2017). Intersectional feminisms: Reflections on theory and activism in Sara Ahmed's living a feminist life (2017). Women's Studies Journal, 31(2), 4-17.
Murphy, Y., Hamilton, L., Hunt, V. H., Norris, A. N., & Zajicek, A. M. (2009). Incorporating intersectionality in social work practice, research, policy, and education. Washington DC, United States: NASW Press, National Association of Social Workers.
Nayak, S., Montenegro, M., & Pujol, J. (2019). Conclusion: Contextual intersectionality: A conversation. In S. Nayak, & R. Robbins (Eds.), Intersectionality in social work: Activism and practice in context (pp. 230-250). Abingdon, United Kingdom: Routledge.
Nayak S., & Robbins R. (2019). Intersectionality in social work: Activism and practice in context. New York, United States: Routledge.
Schuster, J. (2016). Intersectional expectations: Young feminists’ perceived failure at dealing with differences and their retreat to individualism. Women’s Studies International Forum, 58, 1-8.
Shimmin, G. (2018, December 7). Appreciating the value of shutting up and listening. Timaru Herald. Retrieved from: https://www.stuff.co.nz/timaru-herald/opinion/109178573/appreciating-the-value-of-shutting-up-and-listening
Simmonds, N. (2011). Mana wahine: Decolonising politics. Women’s Studies Journal, 25(2), 11-25.
Te Awekotuku, N. (1991). Mana wahine Māori: Selected writings on Māori women’s art, culture and politics. Auckland, New Zealand: New Women’s Press.
Ware, F., Breheny, M., & Forster, M. E. (2017). Reproducing the precarious position of young Māori mothers in Aotearoa New Zealand. In S. Groot, N. Tassell-Matamua, C. Van Ommen & B. Masters-Awatere (Eds.), Precarity: Uncertain, insecure and unequal lives in Aotearoa New Zealand (pp. 136-146). Palmerston North, New Zealand: Massey University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
First publication
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
Copyright
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.
