Tafatolu (three-sides): A Samoan research methodological framework

Authors

  • Alesana Fosi Palaamo Malua Theological College, Samoa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol30iss4id608

Keywords:

Tafatolu, three-sides, research methodology, qualitative research, v?, relational space, Samoa, self

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: A Samoan research methodological framework called Tafatolu (three-sides) involves the synthesis of three key parts considered as valuable to any research – a contemporary academic approach to research, a cultural approach, and the self that represents the researcher’s perspectives and positioning within the project. The rationale behind the Tafatolu methodological framework is to provide an integration of Western and Samoan perspectives to research that incorporates the cultural values and practices of the target population, as well as of the researcher.

METHOD: The researcher’s doctoral study that conceptualised, articulated, and used the Tafatolu methodological framework involved the synthesis of a contemporary academic approach to research (qualitative approach), with a cultural approach (a Samoan metaphor fetu’utu’una’i muniao– manoeuvring a fisher’s rod), merged with the researcher’s own input into doingresearch (positioning as an insider/outsider researcher). Specifically, the Tafatolu methodological framework guided the researcher’s study in its methodology, methods, and the analysis of data.

IMPLICATIONS: The Tafatolu methodological framework proposed and discussed in this paper provides a way to integrate western and contemporary academic approaches to research, with indigenous and cultural approaches. The fusion of its underlying concepts – a contemporary academic approach, a cultural approach, and the self – can accommodate both the context of the targeted populations under review, as well as the context of the researcher.

References

Anae, M. (1998). Fofoa i vao ese: The identity journeys of NZ-born Samoans. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. Retrieved from https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/handle/2292/66.

Anae, M. (2010). Research for better Pacific schooling in New Zealand: Teu le va–a Samoan perspective. Mai Review, 1, 1–24. Retrieved from http://ojs.review.mai.ac.nz/index.php/MR/article/view/298/395.

Armstrong, K., Herdrich, D., & Levine, A. (2011). Historic fishing methods in American Samoa. U.S. Department of Commerce. Retrieved from https://www.pifsc.noaa.gov/library/pubs/tech/NOAA_Tech_Memo_PIFSC_24.pdf.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Byrne, B. (2004). Qualitative interviewing. In C. Seale (Ed.), Researching society and culture (3rd ed., pp. 179–192). London, United Kingdom: Sage Publications.

Dwyer, S. C., & Buckle, J. L. (2009). The space between: On being an insider-outsider in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(1), 54–63.

Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays (Vol. 5019). New York, NY: Basic books.

Hellawell, D. (2006). Inside-out: Analysis of the insider–outsider concept as a heuristic device to develop reflexivity in students doing qualitative research. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(4), 483–494. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13562510600874292.

Hesse-Biber, S. N. (2017). The practice of qualitative research: Engaging students in the research process (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.

Kitzinger, J. (1995). Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups. British Medical Journal, 311(7000), 299–302. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ articles/PMC2550365/

Krämer, A. (1994). The Samoa Islands: An outline of a monograph with particular consideration of German Samoa (T. Verhaaren, Trans. Vol. 1). Auckland, New Zealand: Polynesian Press.

Kusow, A. M. (2003). Beyond indigenous authenticity: Reflections on the insider/outsider debate in immigration research. Symbolic Interaction, 26(4), 591–599. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1525/si.2003.26.4.591/full

Lilomaiava-Doktor, S. (2009). Beyond “migration”: Samoan population movement (malaga) and the geography of social space (vā). The Contemporary Pacific, 21(1), 1–32.

Mailei, F. D. T. (2003). E lele a le toloa a e maau lava i le vai. In P. Fairbairn-Dunlop & G. S. Makisi (Eds.), Making our place: growing up PI in New Zealand (pp. 222–231). Palmerston North, New Zealand: Dunmore Press.

McCarthy, A., Shaban, R., & Stone, C. (2011). Fa’afaletui: A framework for the promotion of renal health in an Australian Samoan community. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 22(1), 55–62. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1043659610387154

McLeod, J. (2001). Qualitative research in counselling and psychotherapy. London, United Kingdom: Sage Publications.

Morse, J. M. (1994). “Emerging from the data”: The cognitive processes of analysis in qualitative inquiry. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 23–43). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.

Osmer, R. R. (2008). Practical theology: An introduction. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans.

Pala’amo, A. (2017). Fetu’utu’una’i le va Navigating relational space: An exploration of pastoral counselling practices for Samoans. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Massey University, Albany, New Zealand). Retrieved from https://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/11813

Reiners, G. M. (2012). Understanding the differences between Husserl’s (descriptive) and Heidegger's (interpretive) phenomenological research. Journal of Nursing & Care, 1(5), 1–3. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2167-1168.1000119

Ryan, F., Coughlan, M., & Cronin, P. (2009). Interviewing in qualitative research: The one-to-one interview. International Journal of Therapy & Rehabilitation, 16(6), 309–314.

Sauni, S. L. (2011). Samoan research methodology: The ula–a new paradigm. Pacific-Asian Education, 23(2), 53–64. Retrieved from https://cdn.auckland.ac.nz/assets/education/about/schools/crstie/docs/2012/PAE_23__2__final_11.pdf#page=53

Suaalii‐Sauni, T., & Fulu‐Aiolupotea, S. M. (2014). Decolonising Pacific research, building Pacific research communities and developing Pacific research tools: The case of the talanoa and the faafaletui in Samoa. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 55(3), 331–344.

Tamasese, K., Peteru, C., Waldegrave, C., & Bush, A. (2005). Ole taeao afua, the new morning: A qualitative investigation into Samoan perspectives on mental health and culturally appropriate services. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 39, 300–309.

Taylor, S. J., Bogdan, R., & DeVault, M. (2016). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.

Tiatia, J. (1998). Caught between cultures: A New Zealand-born Pacific Island perspective. Auckland, New Zealand: Christian Research Association.

Tui Atua, T. T. T. E. (1994). The riddle in Samoan history. Journal of Pacific History, 29(1), 66–79.

Tui Atua, T. T. T. E. (2003). In search of meaning, nuance and metaphor in social policy. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, 20, 49–63. Retrieved from http://www.msd.govt.nz/documents/about-msd-and-our-work/publications-resources/journals-and-magazines/social-policy-journal/spj20/20-pages49-63.pdf

Tuisuga-le-taua, F. A. (2011). O le Tofa liliu a Samoa: A hermeneutical critical analysis of the cultural-theological praxis of the Samoan context. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Melbourne College of Divinity, Melbourne, Australia. Retrieved from http://repository.divinity.edu.au/900/1/2011Th(PhD)_Tuisuga,FA_O_Le_Tofa_Liliu_A_Samoa.pdf

Vaioleti, T. M. (2006). Talanoa research methodology: A developing position on Pacific research. Waikato Journal of Education, 12, 21–34. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10289/6199

Downloads

Published

2019-06-17

How to Cite

Palaamo, A. F. (2019). Tafatolu (three-sides): A Samoan research methodological framework. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 30(4), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol30iss4id608

Issue

Section

Original Articles