Tafatolu (three-sides): A Samoan research methodological framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol30iss4id608Keywords:
Tafatolu, three-sides, research methodology, qualitative research, v?, relational space, Samoa, selfAbstract
INTRODUCTION: A Samoan research methodological framework called Tafatolu (three-sides) involves the synthesis of three key parts considered as valuable to any research – a contemporary academic approach to research, a cultural approach, and the self that represents the researcher’s perspectives and positioning within the project. The rationale behind the Tafatolu methodological framework is to provide an integration of Western and Samoan perspectives to research that incorporates the cultural values and practices of the target population, as well as of the researcher.
METHOD: The researcher’s doctoral study that conceptualised, articulated, and used the Tafatolu methodological framework involved the synthesis of a contemporary academic approach to research (qualitative approach), with a cultural approach (a Samoan metaphor fetu’utu’una’i muniao– manoeuvring a fisher’s rod), merged with the researcher’s own input into doingresearch (positioning as an insider/outsider researcher). Specifically, the Tafatolu methodological framework guided the researcher’s study in its methodology, methods, and the analysis of data.
IMPLICATIONS: The Tafatolu methodological framework proposed and discussed in this paper provides a way to integrate western and contemporary academic approaches to research, with indigenous and cultural approaches. The fusion of its underlying concepts – a contemporary academic approach, a cultural approach, and the self – can accommodate both the context of the targeted populations under review, as well as the context of the researcher.
References
Anae, M. (1998). Fofoa i vao ese: The identity journeys of NZ-born Samoans. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. Retrieved from https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/handle/2292/66.
Anae, M. (2010). Research for better Pacific schooling in New Zealand: Teu le va–a Samoan perspective. Mai Review, 1, 1–24. Retrieved from http://ojs.review.mai.ac.nz/index.php/MR/article/view/298/395.
Armstrong, K., Herdrich, D., & Levine, A. (2011). Historic fishing methods in American Samoa. U.S. Department of Commerce. Retrieved from https://www.pifsc.noaa.gov/library/pubs/tech/NOAA_Tech_Memo_PIFSC_24.pdf.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Byrne, B. (2004). Qualitative interviewing. In C. Seale (Ed.), Researching society and culture (3rd ed., pp. 179–192). London, United Kingdom: Sage Publications.
Dwyer, S. C., & Buckle, J. L. (2009). The space between: On being an insider-outsider in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(1), 54–63.
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays (Vol. 5019). New York, NY: Basic books.
Hellawell, D. (2006). Inside-out: Analysis of the insider–outsider concept as a heuristic device to develop reflexivity in students doing qualitative research. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(4), 483–494. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13562510600874292.
Hesse-Biber, S. N. (2017). The practice of qualitative research: Engaging students in the research process (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
Kitzinger, J. (1995). Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups. British Medical Journal, 311(7000), 299–302. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ articles/PMC2550365/
Krämer, A. (1994). The Samoa Islands: An outline of a monograph with particular consideration of German Samoa (T. Verhaaren, Trans. Vol. 1). Auckland, New Zealand: Polynesian Press.
Kusow, A. M. (2003). Beyond indigenous authenticity: Reflections on the insider/outsider debate in immigration research. Symbolic Interaction, 26(4), 591–599. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1525/si.2003.26.4.591/full
Lilomaiava-Doktor, S. (2009). Beyond “migration”: Samoan population movement (malaga) and the geography of social space (vā). The Contemporary Pacific, 21(1), 1–32.
Mailei, F. D. T. (2003). E lele a le toloa a e maau lava i le vai. In P. Fairbairn-Dunlop & G. S. Makisi (Eds.), Making our place: growing up PI in New Zealand (pp. 222–231). Palmerston North, New Zealand: Dunmore Press.
McCarthy, A., Shaban, R., & Stone, C. (2011). Fa’afaletui: A framework for the promotion of renal health in an Australian Samoan community. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 22(1), 55–62. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1043659610387154
McLeod, J. (2001). Qualitative research in counselling and psychotherapy. London, United Kingdom: Sage Publications.
Morse, J. M. (1994). “Emerging from the data”: The cognitive processes of analysis in qualitative inquiry. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 23–43). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
Osmer, R. R. (2008). Practical theology: An introduction. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans.
Pala’amo, A. (2017). Fetu’utu’una’i le va Navigating relational space: An exploration of pastoral counselling practices for Samoans. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Massey University, Albany, New Zealand). Retrieved from https://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/11813
Reiners, G. M. (2012). Understanding the differences between Husserl’s (descriptive) and Heidegger's (interpretive) phenomenological research. Journal of Nursing & Care, 1(5), 1–3. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2167-1168.1000119
Ryan, F., Coughlan, M., & Cronin, P. (2009). Interviewing in qualitative research: The one-to-one interview. International Journal of Therapy & Rehabilitation, 16(6), 309–314.
Sauni, S. L. (2011). Samoan research methodology: The ula–a new paradigm. Pacific-Asian Education, 23(2), 53–64. Retrieved from https://cdn.auckland.ac.nz/assets/education/about/schools/crstie/docs/2012/PAE_23__2__final_11.pdf#page=53
Suaalii‐Sauni, T., & Fulu‐Aiolupotea, S. M. (2014). Decolonising Pacific research, building Pacific research communities and developing Pacific research tools: The case of the talanoa and the faafaletui in Samoa. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 55(3), 331–344.
Tamasese, K., Peteru, C., Waldegrave, C., & Bush, A. (2005). Ole taeao afua, the new morning: A qualitative investigation into Samoan perspectives on mental health and culturally appropriate services. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 39, 300–309.
Taylor, S. J., Bogdan, R., & DeVault, M. (2016). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
Tiatia, J. (1998). Caught between cultures: A New Zealand-born Pacific Island perspective. Auckland, New Zealand: Christian Research Association.
Tui Atua, T. T. T. E. (1994). The riddle in Samoan history. Journal of Pacific History, 29(1), 66–79.
Tui Atua, T. T. T. E. (2003). In search of meaning, nuance and metaphor in social policy. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, 20, 49–63. Retrieved from http://www.msd.govt.nz/documents/about-msd-and-our-work/publications-resources/journals-and-magazines/social-policy-journal/spj20/20-pages49-63.pdf
Tuisuga-le-taua, F. A. (2011). O le Tofa liliu a Samoa: A hermeneutical critical analysis of the cultural-theological praxis of the Samoan context. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Melbourne College of Divinity, Melbourne, Australia. Retrieved from http://repository.divinity.edu.au/900/1/2011Th(PhD)_Tuisuga,FA_O_Le_Tofa_Liliu_A_Samoa.pdf
Vaioleti, T. M. (2006). Talanoa research methodology: A developing position on Pacific research. Waikato Journal of Education, 12, 21–34. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10289/6199
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
First publication
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
Copyright
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.
